Case Results – Brancato Law Firm, P.A.

Infographic of case results by The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., Tampa criminal defense attorneys: charges never filed through pre-file advocacy, not guilty verdicts at trial, sex offender registration avoided, and dismissals based on independent forensic, DNA and video review.

These are results our attorneys have obtained for clients across Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties: not guilty verdicts at trial, charges stopped before they were ever filed, sex offender registration avoided, and dismissals built on independent forensic and video review. Each result below starts with a one-line summary. Open any result for the full story.

Every case is different. The outcomes below depended on their own facts, and past results do not guarantee a future outcome.

Results like these reflect the experience behind the firm’s awards and peer ratings. Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

  • Not guilty: second-degree murder, self-defense at trial.
  • Death penalty withdrawn in a cold-case murder after a Daubert challenge to the DNA evidence.
  • Human trafficking sting reduced to non-registrable offenses after an entrapment motion (October 2026).
  • Full exoneration: cold-case DNA sexual battery, client excluded by the defense DNA expert.
  • First-degree murder charge dropped after the defense pathologist showed the child drowned.
  • Fentanyl trafficking dismissed three weeks after the arrest.
  • Life felony reduced to misdemeanor trespass and time served after body camera review.
  • Commercial driver’s license reinstated on appeal after a DUI suspension.
  • Domestic violence, drug, and sex investigations closed before charges were ever filed.

Homicide & Violent Crimes Results

Aggravated Assault with a Deadly Weapon — Pretrial Intervention, Charge to Be Dismissed (October 2026)

A veteran facing five years in prison. A Stand Your Ground motion and the firm’s mitigation report led to Pretrial Intervention.

Read the full case

Jean-Luc Adrien represented a military veteran with no prior record who faced up to five years in prison on a felony aggravated assault charge. The State’s initial offer included no path to dismissal. Jean-Luc filed a Stand Your Ground Motion for Immunity and submitted the firm’s proprietary mitigation report, which we prepare for every client, along with medical mitigation. The State admitted the client into Pretrial Intervention. When he completes the program, the charge will be dismissed and he will avoid a felony conviction.

Aggravated Assault with a Deadly Weapon — All Charges Dismissed (May 2026)

Body camera showed the deputies doubted the accuser. A deposition and a memo to the prosecutor ended the case.

Read the full case

Rocky represented a man charged with aggravated assault with a deadly weapon—a butcher knife—after being accused of chasing his roommate around the house. Through an extensive and meticulous review of body camera footage, Rocky discovered a critical moment: the responding deputies debated on camera whether charges were even warranted, noting the alleged victim was “Signal 25″—law enforcement shorthand for mentally ill and delusional—and that Rocky’s client was more credible than the accuser. The inexperienced deputies ultimately arrested Rocky’s client only as a safety precaution, despite not believing the victim’s account.

Rocky then took the alleged victim’s deposition, where the victim confirmed the deputies’ instincts—expressing delusional beliefs that Rocky’s client was an “Anti-Christ” while describing himself as a “chosen one.” Rocky presented an extensive memorandum to the prosecutor, arguing that the deputies’ own debate over whether to charge, captured on their body cameras, was the very definition of reasonable doubt. The prosecutor agreed and dismissed all charges.

From Life Felony to Time Served: A Case of Critical Evidence Review (April 2026)

Body camera showed the client broke up the fight. Burglary with battery was reduced to misdemeanor trespass.

Read the full case

Rocky’s client was accused of burglary with battery, a first-degree felony punishable by life. Through meticulous review of body camera footage, Rocky discovered that the detective’s report was incorrect. Although his client was present in the home, she had actually intervened to break up the fight rather than participate in it. As a result, the charge was reduced to misdemeanor trespass, and she was sentenced to time served.

Aggravated Assault — Charges Never Filed, Letter of Release Issued (February 2026)

Hired the day of the arrest. The alleged victim’s affidavit led the State to decline charges within 24 days.

Read the full case

Rocky represented a client charged with Aggravated Assault, a third-degree felony punishable by up to 5 years in prison. Hired the day of the arrest, Rocky appeared at First Appearance Court and secured a low bond. Within 24 hours, Rocky contacted the alleged victim, who wanted the charges dismissed. Rocky prepared a handcrafted affidavit based on the alleged victim’s wishes, which the victim signed, notarized, and returned the next day. Rocky submitted the affidavit along with supporting background information to the intake prosecutor. Twenty-four days later, the State chose not to file charges and issued a Letter of Release.

Robbery with Firearm — Reduced, Life Sentence Avoided (January 2026)

Depositions and mitigation showed a lesser role. Reduced to grand theft and misdemeanor battery, with no felony conviction.

Read the full case

Rocky represented a client charged with robbery with a firearm and aggravated battery with a firearm—charges carrying the possibility of a life sentence. Through deposition work and a mitigation presentation, Rocky demonstrated that his client’s involvement was significantly less than the codefendant’s.

The charges were reduced to grand theft and misdemeanor battery. The court withheld adjudication and sentenced the client to 180 days in jail. The client avoided both a life sentence and a felony conviction.

Battery — Dismissed After Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis (January 2026)

Video analysis showed the client was the one attacked. The State dropped the case.

Read the full case

Rocky represented a woman who was actually the victim of a battery—but found herself charged instead. The incident occurred at a beloved Tampa sporting venue, and because the other party was an employee, police sided with her and arrested Rocky’s client.

The client came to Rocky after a frustrating experience with another attorney. Rocky conducted a frame-by-frame analysis of all video footage and generated a detailed audio transcript. The analysis showed the employee was the aggressor and that the officer could not have seen what she claimed. Rocky also obtained the “victim’s” medical records, which confirmed she was not injured despite her allegations.

Rocky presented his findings to the prosecutor. The State entered a Nolle Prosse, dismissing the case entirely.

Robbery Dismissed, Aggravated Battery Reduced to Misdemeanor (November 2025)

After the defense investigation, the robbery was dismissed and the aggravated battery reduced to a misdemeanor.

Read the full case

Rocky represented a woman accused of participating in a robbery and severely beating another woman. After Rocky’s investigation, the robbery was dismissed and the aggravated battery was reduced to a misdemeanor, resulting in a probationary sentence.

Gang Beating and Kidnapping — Reduced to Misdemeanors (September 2025)

Holding the State to speedy trial produced a misdemeanor battery plea and probation.

Read the full case

Rocky represented a man initially arrested for kidnapping a fellow gang member and participating in a severe beating—beating him out of the gang. Rocky strategically chose not to waive speedy trial while he investigated the case. The leverage gained by working within speedy trial resulted in a plea offer to misdemeanor battery and probation—avoiding serious felony convictions for kidnapping and aggravated battery.

Battery on Law Enforcement — Old Warrant Resolved, Reduced to Misdemeanor (September 2025)

A three-year-old felony warrant resolved as a misdemeanor with credit for time served.

Read the full case

A man who had moved to another state reached out to Rocky about a 3-year-old warrant for Battery on a Law Enforcement Officer. Rocky obtained the file from the Public Defender and investigated the allegations. He worked out a resolution for a misdemeanor and credit for time already served. The man can now get on with his life without the felony warrant hanging over his head.

Not Guilty — Second-Degree Murder (Self-Defense)

A roommate shooting tried to verdict. The jury acquitted on self-defense.

Read the full case

Rocky defended a client accused of second-degree murder following a fatal shooting involving his roommate. The case proceeded to trial. The defense was based on the justifiable use of deadly force. Through direct examination, Rocky demonstrated that the shooting was in self-defense. The Tampa jury heard the evidence and returned a Not Guilty verdict, fully acquitting his client.

Death Penalty Withdrawn — Cold-Case Murder and Sexual Battery (DNA Evidence)

The defense found the DNA-matched cigarette butt stored with the rape kit. After a Daubert hearing, the State withdrew the death penalty.

Second-Degree Murder — Reduced to Manslaughter at Trial, Life Sentence Avoided

The client killed a man in self-defense while committing a crime. The jury rejected murder, and he received a term of years instead of life.

First-Degree Murder Charge Dropped, Aggravated Child Abuse Reduced to Child Neglect

A defense pathologist showed the child drowned and the liver injury came from CPR. The murder charge was dropped.

Read the full case

In a highly sensitive case, Rocky defended a Tampa grandmother charged with first-degree murder and aggravated child abuse. The charges related to the drowning death of her granddaughter. Prosecutors initially alleged a liver laceration was evidence of abuse.

Rocky’s defense involved retaining a forensic pathologist and conducting an extensive review of medical records. He deposed the state’s medical experts. Through rigorous analysis, Rocky and his expert demonstrated the cause of death was drowning—and the liver injury resulted from CPR efforts, not abuse. This compelling evidence led the prosecutor to drop the murder charge and reduce the aggravated child abuse charge. The client pleaded to the lesser charge of child neglect and received probation.

Vehicular Homicide — Reduced to Reckless Driving

Accident reconstruction and a brake-system defense led to a reckless driving plea and probation, not prison.

Read the full case

In a tragic case involving a fatal single-vehicle crash, Rocky defended a client accused of vehicular homicide in Tampa. The prosecution alleged reckless driving caused the accident. Rocky retained an accident reconstruction expert and focused the defense on potential issues with the vehicle’s braking system. Through these efforts, Rocky successfully negotiated a reduction of the charge to reckless driving with serious bodily injury. His client avoided prison and received a sentence of 48 months probation.

Not Guilty — Kidnapping and Robbery

A mistaken identity defense at trial. Not guilty on both charges.

Read the full case

Rocky defended a client facing serious kidnapping and robbery charges in Plant City. At trial, Rocky presented a strong mistaken identity defense, challenging the prosecution’s evidence at every turn. The jury deliberated and returned a Not Guilty verdict on both charges, fully exonerating his client.

Not Guilty — Armed Robbery with Firearm (Two Counts)

Rocky’s own investigation of the scene and the evidence room supported a mistaken identity defense. Not guilty on both counts.

Read the full case

Rocky represented a client accused of robbing a man for expensive car rims at gunpoint. Before trial, Rocky conducted a thorough personal investigation—visiting the client’s home, the incident scene, and the evidence room to examine all evidence, including a specific reversible jacket.

This meticulous preparation allowed Rocky to cross-examine the detectives with superior knowledge of the details and also prepare his client to testify. He mounted a successful mistaken identity defense. The jury returned Not Guilty verdicts on both counts of Armed Robbery.

Not Guilty — Armed Robbery (Wimauma)

The victim never mentioned the client’s distinctive tattoo. The jury acquitted.

Read the full case

Rocky defended a client accused of armed robbery. At trial, he employed a mistaken identity defense, highlighting a crucial detail: the victim failed to mention the defendant’s distinctive arm tattoo when describing the suspect to police. This significant inconsistency created reasonable doubt, leading the jury to return a Not Guilty verdict.

Not Guilty — Aggravated Assault and Battery

Cross-examination and evidence challenges led to not guilty verdicts on both counts.

Read the full case

Rocky represented a man accused of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and battery. At trial, through effective cross-examination and evidence challenges, the jury found his client Not Guilty of both serious counts.

Sex Crimes Results

Human Trafficking Sting — Reduced to Non-Registrable Offenses, Adjudication Withheld (October 2026)

An entrapment motion and the firm’s mitigation report reduced a commercial human trafficking charge to offenses that do not require sex offender registration.

Read the full case

Rocky was brought onto the defense team for his experience defending sex crimes and entrapment cases. The client was charged with commercial human trafficking after an undercover sting in which police officers played the role of a trafficker offering teenage girls. No real children were involved, but the State had the client on video agreeing to exchange money for sex with the girls the officers described.

Rocky filed a significant motion to dismiss arguing that the officers entrapped the client. He also prepared and presented the firm’s proprietary mitigation report, which we prepare for every client.

The charges were reduced to prostitution and unlawful use of a two-way communications device to facilitate a felony. Neither is a sex offender registration offense. The client received a withheld adjudication and probation.

Lewd or Lascivious Molestation — Charges Not Filed (August 2026)

The alleged victim’s wishes and the firm’s bond advocacy led the State to decline all charges.

Read the full case

Rocky represented a man charged with lewd or lascivious molestation and other sexually related offenses. Based on the wishes of the alleged victim—who was 17 at the time of the offense—and the firm’s bond advocacy, the State issued a Letter of Release on all charges, declining to file.

Child Pornography Charges Reduced to Non-Registrable Offense, Sex Offender Registration Avoided (June 2026)

Early mitigation and Rocky’s own review of the files reduced four child pornography counts to a non-registrable offense.

Read the full case

Our client was charged with four counts of possession of child pornography — felonies that would have required him to register as a sex offender for life. He contacted the firm after law enforcement had visited his home but before any arrest, giving Rocky the window he needed to get ahead of the case.

Rocky moved immediately on mitigation. He referred the client to treatment and built an extensive mitigation packet, including an independent risk assessment. He also went to the law enforcement station and reviewed the files himself, identifying that three of them were “age-difficult” — meaning the individuals could reasonably be either children or young adults rather than clearly minors. Rocky’s firsthand review and the mitigation he assembled convinced the prosecutor to reduce the charges to four counts of obscenity under Florida Statute § 847.011(1)(a), an offense that does not require sex offender registration.

The client received a withheld adjudication and three years of probation. Because Rocky had him complete treatment before the plea, the client also earned credit toward his probation — positioning him to seek possible early termination at the 18-month mark.

Indecent, Lewd, or Lascivious Touching of a Minor — Charge Dismissed, Sex Offender Registration Avoided (April 2026)

Out-of-state depositions and camera evidence police never sought led the State to drop the felony. No registration.

Read the full case

Rocky represented a client accused of molesting a 16-year-old boy at a Florida amusement park. The charge was indecent, lewd, or lascivious touching of certain minors — a felony carrying prison time and a lifetime requirement to register as a sex offender.

Shortly after the arrest, Rocky went to the amusement park parking lot himself and documented the surveillance cameras that would have captured the alleged incident—footage law enforcement had never sought. He then traveled across the country to the state where the alleged victim lived and took the depositions of the boy, members of his family, and local police. Through meticulous and strategic questioning, Rocky exposed significant weaknesses in the story. He also presented defense witnesses who were aware of inconsistent statements made by the alleged victim’s family shortly after the incident was alleged to have occurred.

Through this work, Rocky convinced the State to dismiss the felony sex charge. The client pled to a reduced charge of child abuse, received a withheld adjudication and probation, and will not have to register as a sex offender.

Child Pornography Investigation — Closed Without Arrest (April 2026)

The firm took over all contact with the detective. The investigation closed without an arrest.

Read the full case

A family hired The Brancato Law Firm after their child was accused of possessing an explicit video of another minor. Rocky immediately contacted the detective, invoked the client’s right to an attorney, and directed the detective to go through the firm for any further communication. The investigation lasted for months. This circle of protection around the client ended with the investigation being closed without an arrest. The parents’ quick action in hiring the firm was instrumental in the outcome.

Child Molestation Investigation — No Charges Filed (March 2026)

Rocky worked directly with law enforcement throughout the investigation. No charges were filed.

Read the full case

Rocky represented a man under investigation for molesting his niece. Rather than wait for charges to be filed, Rocky was proactive—contacting the law enforcement agency directly and acting as a go-between in providing and receiving information throughout the investigation.

Ultimately, no charges were ever filed. A great weight was lifted off the client’s back—one that could have haunted him for the rest of his life.

Lewd or Lascivious Conduct Investigation — No Charges Filed (January 2026)

Rocky kept the client out of a police interview while he investigated. No charges were filed.

Read the full case

Rocky’s client was under investigation for lewd or lascivious conduct with his stepdaughter. The client was innocent—the child had fabricated the story in order to live with another family member.

Rocky interviewed witnesses and acted as a go-between with the detective while shielding his client from a police interview. After several months, the investigation was closed, the client was never arrested and no charges were ever filed.

Sex Offender Registration — Registration Requirement Avoided (January 2026)

Rocky confirmed with the Sheriff’s Office that the client did not meet Florida’s registration threshold.

Read the full case

A man who had been removed from the sex offender registry in another state contacted The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. after purchasing a residence in Florida. The Sheriff’s Office contacted him through his Ring camera while he was out of state, advising that he needed to register in Florida.

Rocky investigated and determined the client had not met the threshold for registration under Florida law. He contacted the Sheriff’s Office registration unit on the client’s behalf and obtained assurances that registration would not be required so long as the client did not return to Florida and meet the statutory threshold—saving the client from a lifetime of sex offender registration requirements.

Juvenile Sex Charges — Path to Dismissal, No Registration (September 2025)

A treatment-based agreement gives the juvenile a path to dismissal with no sex offender label.

Read the full case

Rocky represented a juvenile accused of sex offenses involving a younger child. Recognizing the long-term consequences of a conviction and sex offender status, Rocky negotiated an alternative rehabilitation plan tailored to the child’s needs. The agreement allows the juvenile to enter therapy under professional supervision, with the possibility of dismissal once treatment is completed. Most importantly, this resolution ensures the child will not be labeled a sex offender—protecting his future while addressing the situation through treatment rather than punishment.

Sexual Predator Designation — Corrected, Rights Expanded (August 2025)

An improper predator designation reduced to offender status, with internet access and family contact restored.

Read the full case

Rocky represented a man who had been improperly designated a sexual predator years earlier by another attorney’s handling of his case. After uncovering the error, Rocky successfully corrected the designation, reducing his status to sexual offender. With that crucial step achieved, Rocky then filed a motion requesting relief from the harsh restrictions that had limited his client’s life. The court granted internet access and approved contact with family children under a therapist-approved safety plan, allowing the client to move forward with greater freedom and dignity.

Google Search Warrant — Sex Charges Avoided, Client Advised (August 2025)

Rocky contacted the detective and invoked the client’s rights. The agency did not file charges.

Read the full case

A client reached out after receiving notice from Google that police had obtained a search warrant for her online records. The warrant had required Google not to disclose this until a specific time period passed. Rocky reached out to the agency, spoke with the detective, found out what the investigation was about, and invoked the client’s right to an attorney and to remain silent.

Ultimately, the agency decided not to proceed with charges on a case where someone in the client’s home had been chatting with a minor. The client’s worries were reduced, and she was armed with advice that will allow her to mitigate or eliminate any future investigation.

Solicitation to Commit Human Trafficking — Probation, Contact with Child Preserved (July 2025)

After a trial conviction, treatment and advocacy led to probation below the guidelines and continued contact with the client’s child.

Read the full case

Rocky collaborated with another firm on a jury trial of a man accused of solicitation to commit human trafficking and using a computer to commit a sex crime. Although the client was convicted at trial, the work of both attorneys and the client’s participation in treatment before trial contributed to the judge departing from the guidelines and sentencing the client to probation. Because of the treatment completed, the client was able to maintain contact with his child and use the internet while on probation—significant relief from the restrictions that typically accompany such convictions.

Sexual Predator Designation — Removed (April 2025)

A motion for reconsideration persuaded the prosecutor and the judge to remove an unlawful predator designation.

Read the full case

A client sought help challenging a sexual predator designation imposed years prior by previous counsel. Rocky conducted a meticulous review of court records and relevant statutes and identified that the client did not meet the legal criteria for the designation. He filed a motion to correct the illegal sentence.

Although initially denied, Rocky filed a compelling motion for reconsideration. His legal analysis convinced the prosecutor to agree, leading the judge to withdraw the previous order and remove the sexual predator designation. This outcome significantly improved the client’s future prospects.

Cold-Case Sexual Battery (DNA) — Full Exoneration

A DNA expert showed the client was excluded. All charges dismissed.

Read the full case

Rocky defended a Tampa military veteran accused in a “cold hit” DNA case involving an alleged sexual battery that occurred eight years prior. Rocky recognized the critical nature of forensic evidence and retained a DNA expert, conducting a comprehensive review of all DNA evidence.

The expert’s analysis and assistance during depositions demonstrated that Rocky’s client was excluded as a contributor to the DNA profile from the victim. Based on this definitive evidence, the prosecutor dismissed all charges, achieving a full exoneration for the client.

Unlawful Sexual Conduct with Minor — Dismissed

Social media investigation and inconsistent statements led the prosecutor to dismiss.

Read the full case

Rocky represented a 27-year-old client accused of unlawful sexual contact with a 16-year-old. Rocky conducted an extensive investigation of the alleged victim’s social media, which revealed she presented as older online and appeared with other older men. He highlighted multiple inconsistent stories given by the alleged victim. This powerful evidence led the prosecutor to dismiss the charge completely.

Not Guilty — Sexual Battery (Ybor City)

Cross-examination showed the encounter was consensual. Not guilty of attempted sexual battery.

Read the full case

Rocky defended a client accused of sexual battery and trespass in Ybor City. Prosecutors alleged the client lured the victim into a van. Rocky’s cross-examination highlighted inconsistencies in the allegations and established that the encounter was consensual. Evidence suggested the sexual assault claim arose only after they were discovered. The jury returned a Not Guilty verdict on attempted sexual battery, convicting only on misdemeanor trespass.

Lewd/Lascivious Conduct — Reduced, Avoided Sex Offender Registration

The jury rejected the felony. Misdemeanor exposure only, and no sex offender registration.

Read the full case

A client faced charges of lewd or lascivious conduct in front of children. The prosecution relied on child testimony. Through strategic cross-examination, Rocky exposed inconsistencies in their statements and raised doubts about their ability to accurately witness the alleged acts. The jury rejected the felony charge, finding the client guilty only of misdemeanor exposure of a sexual organ. The client successfully avoided sex offender registration.

Drug Crimes Results

Drug Possession (Multiple Counts) — Dismissed, Eligible for Expungement (October 2026)

Diversion completed, charges dismissed, and the client is now eligible for expungement.

Read the full case

Rocky represented a young man charged with multiple counts of possessing party drugs and pills. Rocky negotiated a diversion program that would result in dismissal upon completion. The client has since completed the program, the charges were dismissed, and he is now eligible to have his record expunged.

Felony Drug Possession (Husband and Wife) — Charges Never Filed (March 2026)

Pre-file advocacy on constructive possession in shared luggage. Charges were never filed against either spouse.

Read the full case

Rocky represented a husband and wife who flew to Tampa for a cruise vacation. During a security screening of their luggage by the cruise line, felony amounts of marijuana were discovered in multiple forms — vape cartridges, flower, and edibles. Both were arrested and taken to the Hillsborough County jail, missing their cruise entirely.

The couple retained Rocky and waived any conflict of interest to allow him to represent them both. Through pre-file advocacy, Rocky presented the facts to the State Attorney’s Office, arguing that constructive possession applied — neither spouse could be individually linked to the drugs in shared luggage. He also emphasized the significant punishment the couple had already endured: arrest, jail, a ruined vacation, and the financial loss of the cruise. The prosecutor agreed. Charges were never filed against either client.

Sale of Cocaine Near Church — Enhancement Dropped, Prison Avoided (November 2025)

The sale video was missing. The 1,000-foot enhancement was dropped and the client received probation instead of prison.

Read the full case

A man represented by the Public Defender contacted Rocky on the eve of trial. The Public Defender’s best offer was a fairly significant prison sentence. According to discovery, the evidence was a video of the sale and testimony of the undercover officer. Discovery included screenshots from the video.

Rocky did what the assistant public defender never did: he demanded to see the video. It turned out the video had been misplaced—all that remained were screenshots and the officer’s testimony. Rocky worked out a resolution where the 1000-feet enhancement was dropped and the client received probation instead of prison.

Trafficking in Amphetamine — Diversion, Charges to Be Dismissed (August 2025)

A motion to suppress exposed the State’s weaknesses. Trafficking was reduced and the client was accepted into diversion.

Read the full case

When prosecutors charged his client with trafficking in amphetamine, the stakes could not have been higher. Rocky immediately attacked the State’s evidence, filing a motion to suppress that exposed serious weaknesses in the prosecution’s case. That motion created the leverage needed to negotiate a far better outcome: the trafficking charge was reduced, and the client was accepted into a diversion program. Under the agreement, the case will be dismissed once the client completes a drug evaluation and any recommended outpatient treatment.

Fentanyl Trafficking — Dismissed in Three Weeks (March 2025)

Pretrial detention defeated, then constructive possession and search issues led to a Letter of Release within three weeks.

Read the full case

Facing serious fentanyl trafficking charges, Rocky’s client was initially subject to a motion for pretrial detention. Rocky successfully challenged this motion, securing the client’s release on bond. He leveraged complex arguments surrounding constructive possession and questioned the legality of the vehicle search. Through strategic negotiation with the prosecutor, within just three weeks of the arrest, the prosecutor issued a Letter of Release, formally dismissing the fentanyl trafficking case.

Cocaine and Firearm — Both Charges Dismissed (January 2025)

Low bonds at first appearance and fast work with the intake prosecutor. Both charges dismissed within days.

Read the full case

Responding to an early morning call on the firm’s 24/7 line, Rocky swiftly acted for a client arrested for possession of cocaine and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony. At the First Appearance hearing, Rocky argued the client’s actions did not meet the intent of the firearm statute, leading the judge to set low bonds.

Rocky’s immediate engagement with the intake prosecutor resulted in both charges being formally dismissed within days of the client’s arrest—preserving a clean record.

Not Guilty — Cocaine Trafficking (200-400 Grams)

The defense showed the co-defendant was the trafficker. The jury acquitted.

Read the full case

A business manager was accused of trafficking 200-400 grams of cocaine in Tampa. At trial, the prosecution relied heavily on co-defendant testimony. Rocky successfully countered this by demonstrating the co-defendant was the actual trafficker—his client was merely present. The jury returned a Not Guilty verdict, clearing the client of all charges.

Not Guilty — Cocaine Delivery Near Church (Two Counts)

Mistaken identity and poor police work. Not guilty on both counts.

Read the full case

Rocky defended a client accused of delivering cocaine within 1000 feet of a church and possession of cocaine. At trial, Rocky presented a mistaken identity defense and highlighted poor police work. The jury found his client Not Guilty on both counts.

Not Guilty — Cocaine Sale Near Church and School

The State could not prove its case. Not guilty on both counts.

Read the full case

Rocky represented a man accused of selling cocaine within 1000 feet of a church and a school. He presented a defense of insufficient proof of guilt. The jury found his client Not Guilty on both counts.

Domestic Violence Results

Domestic Violence Battery by Strangulation — Charges Not Filed (August 2026)

One count dismissed at first appearance. The alleged victim’s affidavit ended the rest.

Read the full case

Jean-Luc Adrien represented a man accused of felony domestic violence battery by strangulation and domestic violence battery. Jean-Luc first got one count dismissed, through arguments, at First Appearance. Jean-Luc then contacted the alleged victim, who did not want to press charges on the remaining count. He prepared an affidavit, which the alleged victim signed and notarized. Jean-Luc presented the affidavit to the prosecutor, who issued a Letter of Release, declining to file charges.

Domestic Violence Battery — Charges Not Filed (August 2026)

The alleged victim’s notarized affidavit led the State to decline charges.

Read the full case

Jean-Luc Adrien represented a woman charged with domestic violence battery. The alleged victim did not want to press charges. Jean-Luc prepared an affidavit, which the alleged victim signed and notarized. The State declined to file charges.

Domestic Violence Battery (Second Offense) — Charges Not Filed (July 2026)

A felony domestic violence charge against a physician. His wife’s affidavit led to a Letter of Release.

Read the full case

Rocky represented a medical doctor charged with domestic violence battery, second offense—a third-degree felony. Rocky met with the doctor’s wife, who did not wish to press charges. Rocky prepared an affidavit, which the wife signed and returned. The State issued a Letter of Release, declining to file charges.

Domestic Violence Battery — Charges Not Filed (July 2026)

The boyfriend’s affidavit led the State to decline charges before arraignment.

Read the full case

Rocky represented a woman charged with battering her live-in boyfriend after someone called police during an argument following a night of drinking. Rocky contacted the boyfriend, who wanted the charges dropped. Rocky crafted an affidavit based on the boyfriend’s wishes, which the boyfriend signed and returned. Rocky provided the affidavit to the State Attorney’s Office, which declined to file charges before arraignment.

Domestic Violence Battery — State Declined to Prosecute (June 2026)

Video showed the husband was the aggressor and was using the case for leverage in the divorce. The State declined to prosecute.

Read the full case

Jean-Luc Adrien represented a woman charged with Domestic Violence Battery against her husband. The couple was going through a divorce, and the client had video evidence showing that the husband had actually battered her. The husband attempted to use the criminal case as leverage to obtain a restraining order to gain an advantage in the divorce. Our office submitted the video to the State Attorney’s Office, but the husband’s objections caused delay. Through continued advocacy with the prosecutor, our office demonstrated that the husband was manipulating the criminal justice system to gain leverage in his divorce proceedings. The State declined to prosecute the case the day before arraignment.

Domestic Violence Battery — Charges Not Filed (June 2026)

Photos of the client’s own injuries and the husband’s affidavit. Charges declined the next day.

Read the full case

Jean-Luc Adrien represented a woman accused of battering her husband. Jean-Luc quickly gathered photographs showing recent injuries to his client from abuse close in time to the incident, supporting her claim of self-defense. He provided those photos to the intake prosecutor. Additionally, the firm reached out to the alleged victim, who wanted the charges dropped and contact restored. An affidavit was quickly prepared and sent to the alleged victim, who promptly signed it before a notary and returned it the same day. The affidavit was submitted to the prosecutor, and the State declined to file charges the next day.

Domestic Violence Battery & Tampering With a Witness — All Charges Dismissed (April–May 2026)

The witness tampering case was dismissed, then the domestic violence case, preserving a military career.

Read the full case

An active-duty service member with top secret clearance was arrested for Domestic Violence Battery and Tampering with Evidence. While in jail, he was charged in a separate case with Tampering with a Witness for allegedly asking another person to contact the victim. After his original attorney failed to respond, the client hired Rocky. Rocky promptly worked with the intake prosecutor to get the second case dismissed. For the original case, which was more complicated, Rocky contacted the alleged victim, who wanted the charges dropped, and prepared an affidavit that the victim signed requesting dismissal. Rocky also coordinated with the client’s JAG officer to navigate a resolution that would preserve his military career. All charges were ultimately dismissed, paving the way for the client to continue serving.

Domestic Violence Battery — Charges Never Filed (April 2026)

The husband who called police hired the firm to defend his wife. Low bond, then charges declined.

Read the full case

The alleged victim hired Rocky after his wife was arrested for Domestic Violence Battery against him. Wanting to undo what had happened, he retained The Brancato Law Firm to represent her. Rocky attended First Appearance Court and helped secure a low bond. He then prepared an affidavit for the victim to sign requesting that charges be dismissed. Through Rocky’s work with the intake prosecutor, the State declined to file charges.

Domestic Violence Battery — Charges Never Filed (March 2026)

A $250 bond at first appearance. The State declined charges within two weeks of the arrest.

Read the full case

A client’s family hired Rocky after she was arrested for Domestic Violence Battery on her boyfriend. Rocky appeared at First Appearance Court and secured a $250 bond. After quickly learning the victim did not wish to prosecute, Rocky quickly prepared a handcrafted affidavit and emailed it to the victim, who signed, notarized, and returned it the same day. Rocky submitted the affidavit to the State Attorney’s Office, which declined to file charges within two weeks of the arrest.

Domestic Violence Battery — Terminated Within 24 Hours (January 2026)

Both parents’ affidavits led the State to end the prosecution within 24 hours, before any arrest.

Read the full case

A mother contacted Rocky because her college-aged son had an active warrant for domestic violence battery. The family had called police only to get him mental health help—not to have him arrested.

Rocky worked with lightning speed, preparing affidavits for both parents to sign requesting that charges not be filed. He presented the affidavits to the intake prosecutor and explained the urgency. Within 24 hours of mom’s call, the State filed a Notice of Termination of Prosecution. The family was able to focus on getting their son well instead of having to deal with an arrest and navigating the criminal justice system. The client will not face lifelong collateral consequences such as ineligibility for gun ownership or military service since he was never arrested.

Domestic Violence — False Arrest Avoided (April 2025)

Evidence of the ex’s abuse led the State to drop the charge and recall the warrant. She never went to jail.

Read the full case

A young woman came to Rocky after her abusive ex falsely accused her of assault. A warrant was out for her arrest. Other attorneys advised her to turn herself in and lower her bond in court.

Rocky took a smarter route—he contacted the intake prosecutor, presented evidence of her abuse, and persuaded the State to drop the charges. The warrant was recalled, and she never had to go to jail or appear in court. Rocky then helped her obtain a restraining order to protect her from future harm.

Child Abuse Crimes Results

Aggravated Child Abuse — Dismissed (Medical Evidence)

A forensic pathologist traced the injury to a congenital cyst. All charges dismissed.

Read the full case

A father faced aggravated child abuse charges after his daughter was found to have a pancreatic injury. Initial medical opinions suggested intentional blunt force trauma. Rocky’s defense included retaining a forensic pathologist and thoroughly reviewing all medical records.

The expert analysis revealed the injury was caused by a congenital choledochal cyst—a condition present since birth, not abuse. This critical medical evidence led the prosecutor to dismiss all charges, completely clearing the father’s name.

Aggravated Child Abuse — Reduced (Medical Condition Defense)

A psychiatrist tied the conduct to the client’s severe toxoplasmosis. Reduced to misdemeanor battery.

Read the full case

A young man was accused of severely injuring his baby. After his arrest, doctors diagnosed the client with severe Toxoplasmosis—a condition that impaired his cognitive and physical abilities. Rocky obtained medical records and hired a psychiatrist who confirmed the condition impaired the client’s functioning at the time of the incident, rendering his conduct involuntary. The aggravated child abuse charge was reduced to misdemeanor battery with probation—a significantly more favorable outcome.

DUI & Traffic Crimes Results

DUI Reduced to Reckless Driving (July 2026)

An airline pilot’s DUI reduced to reckless driving, protecting his career.

Read the full case

DUI, Leaving the Scene & Refusal — Reduced to Reckless Driving, Adjudication Withheld (July 2026)

Not eligible for RIDR because of the crash. A mitigation report and treatment plan earned reckless driving with adjudication withheld.

Read the full case

Rocky represented a client charged with DUI, Leaving the Scene of an Accident, and Refusing a Breath Test. The client did not qualify for the RIDR diversion program due to the crash. Rocky prepared a comprehensive mitigation report and treatment plan, resulting in the prosecutor agreeing to reduce the charges to Reckless Driving with a withheld adjudication.

Driving While License Suspended — Released from Jail, Case Closed Through Diversion (June 2026)

A bond motion filed the same day. The client was released in two days and the case closed through diversion.

Read the full case

Jean-Luc Adrien represented a man arrested on a warrant from an open 2024 case and held without bond. The client had no court date for over a month. Jean-Luc filed a notice of appearance and a motion to set bond on the same day, and the client was released from jail two days later. Jean-Luc then appeared on the client’s behalf and negotiated closure of the case through a diversion program, resulting in no conviction.

DUI Violation of Probation — Warrant Withdrawn, Client Never Jailed (March 2026)

A motion highlighting the veteran’s progress and service. The warrant was withdrawn and he never spent a day in jail.

Read the full case

Rocky represented a combat veteran facing a warrant for violating his DUI probation. Rather than have the client turn himself in, Rocky filed a motion to withdraw the warrant and allow the violation of probation hearing to proceed with the client out of custody.

In the motion, Rocky highlighted the client’s significant progress on probation despite new charges pending in another county. He also presented the court with the client’s military service record and the mental health challenges he carried as a result of that service. The judge was persuaded — the warrant was withdrawn, probation was modified, and the client never spent a day in jail.

Failure to Appear and DWLS — Dismissed (January 2026)

The client never received notice of a new court date. Released on her own recognizance, and both charges dismissed.

Read the full case

Rocky’s client was arrested on a failure to appear warrant and a driving while license suspended charge. She had actually appeared on the date originally noticed—but the court date had changed and she never received notice because she had moved. She had even filed a change of address form with the clerk on the same day as her original court date.

Rocky filed an emergency bond motion and secured her immediate release on her own recognizance. He then worked out a resolution: the client would pay her outstanding traffic tickets and reinstate her license, and the charges would be dismissed. The State dismissed both charges.

Marijuana DUI — Reduced to Reckless Driving (September 2025)

A marijuana DUI negotiated down to reckless driving.

Read the full case

Rocky represented a man pulled over by police. A marijuana blunt was lit at the time of the stop, and the video showed thick smoke emanating from the vehicle. After field sobriety tests, the client was arrested for DUI based on the officer’s belief that he was under the influence of marijuana. Rocky negotiated the charge down to reckless driving.

DUI — Reduced to Reckless Driving (September 2025)

Open containers but no impairment. Reduced to reckless driving.

Read the full case

Rocky represented a man charged with DUI. There were open liquor bottles in the vehicle and the client had consumed alcohol—but he was not unlawfully impaired. Rocky negotiated a reduction to reckless driving.

DUI License Suspension — Overturned on Appeal, CDL Reinstated (September 2025)

After losing at the DHSMV hearing, a certiorari petition reinstated both the regular license and the CDL.

Read the full case

After a DUI arrest, Rocky’s client lost both his standard driver’s license and CDL at the DHSMV administrative hearing. Rocky handled the hearing personally, and when the agency’s own officer upheld the suspension, he did not stop there. Rocky filed a petition for writ of certiorari in circuit court, persuaded a judge that the suspension was improper, and won a ruling reinstating both licenses. The decision not only restored the client’s driving privileges but also protected his livelihood as a commercial driver.

Expired Registration (Second Offense) — Charges Dismissed (August 2025)

The client registered the car and the charge was dismissed.

Read the full case

Rocky represented a man charged with expired registration, second offense. Rocky worked out a resolution where the client would get his car registered and charges were dismissed.

DWLS Exoneration — Body Camera Proved Wrong Person (May 2025)

Body camera footage proved someone else had used the client’s ID. Dismissed the next day.

Read the full case

A client facing driving while license suspended charges sought Rocky’s help. Rocky’s prompt investigation revealed the true driver had used his client’s identification. He immediately requested and obtained the police body camera footage, which confirmed his client was not the driver. The very next day in court, Rocky presented clear screenshots from the video to the prosecutor, resulting in the immediate dismissal of the DWLS charges.

Out-of-State Driver — Florida License Cleared (March 2025)

A clear plan worked out with DHSMV cleared old Florida DUIs that blocked the client’s license at home.

Read the full case

A man from another state contacted Rocky for help clearing old Florida DUIs that were blocking him from getting an unrestricted license at home. While other attorneys offered vague advice, Rocky researched the law, consulted with the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, and provided a clear, step-by-step plan. The client recently reached out to share his success—his Florida license is now clear, and he holds an unrestricted license in his home state.

Not Guilty — DUI and Resisting Officer

Scene video showed no impairment and no resistance. Not guilty on both counts.

Read the full case

Rocky defended a client charged with DUI (refusal) and resisting arrest without violence. He argued the client was not impaired, using scene video to support the defense. Rocky also contended the officer was overly aggressive and the client did not resist. The jury found his client Not Guilty on both counts.

Not Guilty — Felony DWLS (Habitual Traffic Offender)

The jury would not convict on a redacted paper record. Not guilty.

Read the full case

Rocky represented a man accused of felony Driving While License Suspended with Habitual Traffic Offender status. At trial, the prosecution presented a redacted record. Rocky argued persuasively to the jury that a bureaucrat’s paper record should not be trusted when a man’s liberty is on the line. The jury found his client Not Guilty.

Other Notable Results

Unlicensed Practice of Law Investigation — No Criminal Charges, Bar File Closed (October 2026)

No criminal charges. The Bar closed its file with a Letter of Advisement and no admission of wrongdoing.

Read the full case

Rocky represented a professional under investigation by The Florida Bar for the unlicensed practice of law, which in Florida is also a third-degree felony. Rocky’s carefully crafted responses to the Bar protected the client’s rights while working toward a resolution. No criminal charges were filed. The Bar closed its file with a Letter of Advisement, and the client was not required to admit any wrongdoing.

Possession of Short-Barreled Rifle, Cannabis, and Drug Paraphernalia — Diversion, Deportation Avoided (September 2026)

A mitigation report and a possession motion led to diversion, avoiding a felony and likely deportation.

Read the full case

Jean-Luc Adrien represented a man charged with possession of a short-barreled rifle, possession of a felony amount of cannabis, and possession of drug paraphernalia. Jean-Luc prepared an extensive mitigation report, filed a motion to dismiss for failure to establish actual or constructive possession, and filed a request for a proposed jury instruction on the issue of whether the client knew the firearm was short-barreled and therefore unlawful. Through this work, Jean-Luc negotiated a diversion program for the client—a critical outcome, as a felony conviction would likely have resulted in serious immigration consequences, including his deportation.

Violation of Department of Environmental Protection Rules — Dismissed Through Diversion, Career Preserved (June 2026)

The State had relied on someone else’s prior record. Diversion approved and the client’s career protected.

Read the full case

Jean-Luc Adrien represented a man charged with an environmental violation that, if convicted, would have negatively impacted his employment. Jean-Luc initially sought a diversion program, but the State denied the request based on its erroneous belief that the client had a disqualifying prior conviction. Jean-Luc provided information to the State demonstrating a case of mistaken identity, confirming the client was eligible for diversion. The client entered the program and avoided a conviction that would have jeopardized his career.

Disorderly Intoxication and Harassing First Responder — Charges Not Filed (January 2026)

Video and mitigation. Ten hours of community service and no charges filed.

Read the full case

Rocky represented a man charged with disorderly intoxication and unlawfully impeding, threatening, or harassing a first responder in Ybor City. The incident was captured on video, and it was clear the client’s conduct did not constitute disorderly intoxication. The second charge, however, was a closer call.

Rocky presented mitigation to the prosecutor and worked out an agreement: the client would perform 10 hours of community service, and the State would not file charges. The State did not file either charge.

Loitering and Prowling — Diversion Obtained for Mentally Ill Client (October 2025)

Diversion with mental health treatment for a mentally ill client.

Read the full case

Two parents reached out to Rocky on behalf of their son, who was incarcerated, mentally ill, and arrested for loitering and prowling. Rocky assisted the parents in navigating the bond process and worked out a diversion program where the client would receive a mental health evaluation and participate in treatment in exchange for dismissal of charges.

Two Probation Violations in 30 Days — Dismissal and Termination (July 2025)

The first violation dismissed, and the second ended with probation terminated.

Read the full case

Within a single month, the same client faced two separate violations of probation. On the first violation, Rocky successfully persuaded the court to dismiss the allegation entirely. When the client was brought back on a second violation just weeks later, Rocky again went to work—this time securing an order for probation to be terminated. The result: the client is no longer under supervision and faces no further probation or incarceration.

USF Student — Avoided Disciplinary Record (May 2025)

Mock hearing preparation. Resolved informally with no disciplinary record.

Read the full case

A parent retained Rocky to assist their student facing a Student Conduct & Ethical Development hearing at USF following an off-campus criminal arrest. Although the incident occurred off campus, it was deemed a potential violation of the USF Student Code of Conduct. Rocky provided detailed preparation materials and conducted a mock hearing to ensure the student was fully prepared. With Rocky’s support, the student presented effectively and confidently. The matter was resolved informally with no disciplinary record, and the student was allowed to continue their education without interruption.

Corruption by Threat and Resisting — Diversion Obtained, Deportation Avoided (April 2025)

A motion to suppress created leverage for diversion despite an officer victim, with a path to avoid deportation.

Read the full case

Rocky represented a man charged with corruption by threat against a public servant and resisting an officer without violence. Because the case involved a law enforcement officer, the client—despite having no criminal record—was not eligible for diversion. He also faced deportation.

Rocky filed a motion to suppress, attacking the basis for the encounter. The officer had stopped the client over medical marijuana and believed it was unlawful to possess a marijuana pipe. However, unlike medical marijuana itself—which must be purchased from a licensed facility and kept in its original packaging—paraphernalia has no such requirement for someone with a valid medical marijuana license.

The motion created the leverage Rocky needed to negotiate a diversion program despite the law enforcement involvement. The client is now eligible for dismissal of the charges and has a pathway to avoid deportation.

Out-of-State Felony Warrant — Dismissed (February 2025)

A felony warrant pending for over four years was quashed and the case dismissed.

Read the full case

An out-of-state visitor faced significant anxiety and potential arrest for over four years due to a lingering felony charge from a trip to Tampa. Feeling out of options, she contacted Rocky. He quickly gathered crucial facts and communicated directly with the State Attorney’s Office supervision. The result: the warrant was quashed and the entire case was dismissed.

Not Guilty — Escape (Forged Commutation Order)

The defense challenged the fingerprint and the paper trail. Not guilty.

Read the full case

This complex case involved representing a man accused of forging an order that would commute his life sentence and lead to his release. The forged order was officially clocked in at multiple locations—the Florida Department of Corrections, the prison, and the Miami Clerk of Court. Additionally, the client’s fingerprint was allegedly found on a copy.

Despite this evidence, Rocky mounted a unique defense. He conducted extensive research and investigation, disputed the fingerprint evidence at trial, and cross-examined officials from Miami, including a Circuit Judge. Tried in Pensacola, Rocky employed a strategy he called the “presidential election defense”—leveraging skepticism towards Miami officials following the controversial 2000 election to cast doubt on the paper trail evidence. He did not argue the officials lied, but highlighted the possibility of administrative errors and the lack of direct evidence that his client typed the forged order. The jury found Rocky’s client Not Guilty.

Noteworthy Bond and Pretrial Results

First-Degree Murder and Armed Burglary with a Firearm — Bond Secured After Pretrial Detention (June 2026)

Discovery showed no burglary and a possible self-defense case. Bond set at $75,000 after pretrial detention.

Read the full case

Rocky’s client was charged with first-degree murder and armed burglary with a firearm and held without bond on a pretrial detention motion. After receiving discovery, Rocky rapidly reviewed the entire file and identified evidence showing there was no burglary—and that his client’s state of mind at the time of the shooting was consistent with justifiable use of deadly force, not murder. On rehearing, Rocky presented these findings to the court, and the judge set bond at $75,000. Rocky’s client walked out of jail after paying a bondsman $7,500.

Capital Sexual Battery — Bond Secured, Electronic Monitor Removed (April–May 2026)

The defense exposed how the child’s account was contaminated. Bond set, and later the electronic monitor removed.

Read the full case

Rocky’s client was held without bond on charges of capital sexual battery. Rocky conducted a thorough case review and discovered serious problems with the way DCF and a patrol deputy had suggested details to the child and allowed their own biases to contaminate the integrity of the case at its inception. He filed an extensive bond motion outlining these problems in detail. After a lengthy hearing, the court set bond at $20,000 with an electronic monitor. Rocky later filed a second motion to remove the electronic monitor, arguing that circumstances surrounding his client’s employment and her location over seven hours away from the child made the restriction unnecessary. The court agreed and granted the motion.

Facing Criminal Charges in Tampa Bay?

Results come from preparation, strategy, and experience. For over 25 years, Rocky Brancato has fought for clients throughout Tampa Bay—in the courtroom when necessary, and through strategic negotiation when it serves the client’s interests.

If you or someone you love is facing serious charges, call us. We will review what happened, tell you where the case stands, and explain your options.

Call (813) 727-7159 for a Confidential Consultation

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A.

620 E Twiggs Street, Suite 205,

Tampa, FL 33602

Serving Hillsborough, Pinellas and Pasco Counties

FAQ About Brancato Law Firm Case Results

What types of criminal cases does Rocky Brancato handle?

Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney Rocky Brancato handles serious felony cases throughout Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties. His practice focuses on homicide and violent crimes, drug trafficking and possession, sex crimes and sex offender registration issues, DUI and traffic offenses, child abuse allegations, and domestic violence charges. With over 25 years of experience, Rocky has secured dismissals, acquittals, and favorable resolutions across every category of criminal defense.

Has Rocky Brancato won murder cases?

Yes. Rocky has achieved Not Guilty verdicts in murder trials, including a second-degree murder case where he successfully argued self-defense. He has also had murder charges dropped before trial, including a first-degree murder charge against a grandmother after the defense’s forensic pathologist showed the child drowned and the liver injury came from CPR. In a cold-case capital murder, his Daubert challenge to the DNA evidence led the State to withdraw the death penalty, and in another second-degree murder trial the jury returned only manslaughter, sparing the client a life sentence.

Can Rocky Brancato get drug trafficking charges dismissed?

Rocky has a track record of getting trafficking charges dismissed or significantly reduced. In one fentanyl trafficking case, he secured dismissal within three weeks of arrest by challenging constructive possession and the legality of the vehicle search. In an amphetamine trafficking case, he filed a motion to suppress that created leverage to negotiate diversion, allowing for eventual dismissal.

Does Rocky Brancato handle sex crime cases?

Rocky has extensive experience defending clients accused of sex crimes, including sexual battery, lewd or lascivious conduct, and child molestation allegations. He has achieved full exonerations, including a cold-case DNA sexual battery where his expert proved the client was excluded from the DNA profile. Rocky also handles sex offender registration issues, having successfully removed sexual predator designations and helped clients avoid lifetime registration requirements.

Does The Brancato Law Firm defend undercover sex sting cases?

Yes. The Brancato Law Firm defends clients arrested in undercover stings, including human trafficking and online solicitation cases where officers pose as a trafficker or as a minor. In an October 2026 case, Rocky filed a motion to dismiss for entrapment and presented the firm’s mitigation report, and a commercial human trafficking charge was reduced to offenses that do not require sex offender registration.

Can a criminal defense attorney help during a police investigation before charges are filed?

Yes. Rocky routinely intervenes during the investigation stage to prevent charges from ever being filed. He acts as a go-between with law enforcement, shields clients from police interviews, conducts independent witness interviews, and presents mitigating information to prosecutors. In multiple cases—including child molestation and sex crime investigations—Rocky’s early intervention resulted in investigations being closed with no charges filed.

What is Rocky Brancato’s experience with jury trials?

Rocky has tried well over 100 cases to verdict throughout his 25-year career, securing Not Guilty verdicts on charges including murder, armed robbery, kidnapping, cocaine trafficking, sexual battery, and DUI. His trial preparation includes personal investigation of crime scenes, evidence room inspections, retention of expert witnesses, and meticulous deposition work.

Can Rocky Brancato help if I was wrongly accused?

Rocky has a history of defending clients who were falsely accused or wrongly charged. He has secured dismissals by conducting frame-by-frame video analysis proving his client was the actual victim, obtained body camera footage proving mistaken identity, and presented evidence that accusers fabricated allegations. In domestic violence cases, he has prevented arrests entirely by presenting exculpatory evidence to intake prosecutors before warrants were executed.

How quickly can Rocky Brancato resolve a criminal case?

Resolution time depends on the complexity of the case, but Rocky has achieved rapid results when circumstances allow. He has secured dismissal of fentanyl trafficking charges in three weeks, terminated domestic violence prosecution within 24 hours, and resolved felony warrants within days of engagement. When speed serves the client’s interests, Rocky moves decisively.

Does Rocky Brancato handle cases involving deportation consequences?

Yes. Rocky understands the immigration consequences of criminal convictions and has successfully negotiated outcomes that preserve clients’ ability to remain in the United States. In one case involving corruption by threat against a law enforcement officer, Rocky filed a motion to suppress that created leverage to obtain diversion—providing a pathway to dismissal and avoiding deportation for a client who would otherwise have been ineligible for such a program.

What areas does The Brancato Law Firm serve?

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. serves clients facing criminal charges in Hillsborough County, Pinellas County, and Pasco County, Florida. The office is located at 620 E Twiggs Street, Suite 205, Tampa, FL 33602.

How can I contact Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney Rocky Brancato?

To discuss your case with Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney Rocky Brancato, call The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. at (813) 727-7159 for a confidential consultation. The firm’s 24/7 line ensures you can reach an attorney when you need one most.

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. is a Tampa-based criminal defense practice serving clients exclusively in Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties. We are not affiliated with any other Brancato-named law firms.

This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Each case is unique, and outcomes depend on the individual facts and circumstances involved. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

What Our Clients Are Saying

Brancato Law Firm is hands down the BEST Firm in the Tampa Bay area! The move swift and fast with professionalism. I would HIGHLY RECOMMEND them to support you and your judicial needs. Jean-Luc is a GREAT attorney and would request his service if in need!

Anthony J.

One of top criminal defense lawyers, deep experience, very trustworthy. No gimic.

Mahmoud M.

Rocky is incredible! Extremely knowledgeable, excellent communication with updates as the case goes on without you having to reach out to him, and you can tell he truly cares about what he does. Would recommend this law firm to anyone! Would give 10 stars if I could. Thank you so...

Bryton Ennis

Rocky Brancato was able to provide me with legal help that I didn't even imagine was possible. Because of his experience and knowledge he got me life changing results and that is no exaggeration. Rocky has an in depth knowledge of his field, decades of experience, and...

E. M.

Rocky is the best lawyer. He believed in me when no one else did. He fought hard, and did not stop working until he found the evidence we needed to win my case and clear my name. When he took on my case, it had been already ongoing for quite some time, many other lawyers turned...

Molly G.

I highly recommend Rocky! He was professional, knowledgeable, and always available to answer our questions. He worked hard on our case and helped us achieve a great outcome. A special thanks to his assistant as well—he was incredibly friendly, helpful, and treated us like family...

Akrm E.

Mans got me outta jail he legit !!

NFG President Kay

I’m incredibly grateful for the help I received from this law firm. His knowledge and expertise were evident right away, and he handled everything in a timely and professional way. What stood out most to me was the way I was treated—with care, respect, and genuine decency...

Kristen Crotinger

I had an excellent experience working with Rocky Brancato during an extremely stressful and sensitive situation involving false allegations. From the very beginning, Rocky provided clear, sound advice and took the time to truly listen to all of my concerns without ever...

David E

Rocky is a great lawyer. He jumped on my case and provided almost instant results. He communicated well and made sure we understood our options and the next steps. 5 stars!!!

Jasmine

These folks are awesome, they addressed all my concerns and were very professional.

Willem P.

I don’t even know how to start writing this. This man saved me from something I didn’t do. He’s the best.. thank you thank you .

Jonathan S.

Mr. Brancato deserves five stars from day one. He went over and beyond for me. He doesnt just handle small cases I was facing a trafficking fentanyl charge for something that I didnt do and Mr. Brancato got all of my charges dropped. He is a great attorney. He answered any...

Andrea M

I contacted Rocky Brancato at Brancato Law Firm for guidance regarding Florida law and a potential travel matter. He was straightforward, candid, and extremely professional in his advice. I truly appreciated his honesty and clear explanation of the legal landscape. I would highly...

Kevin Marcus

Rocky Brancato is diligent, trustworthy, with an extraordinary human and professional quality, a gift for people and integrity. All these virtues make him an invaluable attorney. Rocky Brancato has been with our family since day one of this stressful, unfair, and overwhelming...

Lein L.

Rocky was exceptional at providing legal advice and was taking proactive steps throughout the process to assist in my legal matters. Fantastic service and results.

Javier L.

ROCKY IS GREAT HE DID IT TWICE FOR MY FIANCÉ

Mantha W.

I would recommend Mr. Brancato to absolutely anybody. I have been fighting this specific case for about 4 years now and he was able to set time aside to accommodate and was able to get the charges dismissed in less than a WEEK. I can’t thank him enough, and anybody in the Tampa...

Kellz C.

The rare lawyer with a heart Mr. Brancato not only proved his legal acumen, but he did so with genuine empathy and caring. I felt he was personally invested in my success, and acted above and beyond my expectations. He kept me informed all steps of the process, and was upfront...

I.

Mark my words, THIS IS THE BEST LAWYER I’ve ever had the chance to meet and it’s been a pleasure and a major blessing to have him, i had a very difficult case but in less then 5 business day he took the weight of a planet off my shoulders . He goes above and beyond and then did...

Yian V.

Great attorney ! Handled client with care and answered all concerns! Thank you so much !!! A Hard worker is this guy! Thank You for all you did for my fiancé!

Kailyn B.

Rocky Brancato was knowledgeable, responsive, and very professional throughout the entire process. I highly recommend this law firm.

Noel F.

It’s no surprise that this practice has a perfect five-star rating – and they deserve it. I live in Miami, but called Rocky after doing a Google search about my issue. Not only did he get right to the point and answer my questions, he didn’t even charge me. And - I was talking on...

Rob S.

Rocky was the best lawyer i have recieved! He always kept me updated and talked me through everything i couldnt have asked for a better lawyer! Hoping i never have to use him again but he is my go to!! Thank yu rocky it was a pleasure

Lucciano Carmelo

I had a consultation with Rocky and it was exactly what I needed. He listened carefully, gave clear, honest advice, and outlined a smart path forward. Thanks to his guidance and expertise, I now know exactly how to handle the situation. I highly recommend Rocky!

C. Cole

I felt very lucky to be represented by brancato law firm Never had any issues with communication or help with resources and made the whole process easier to navigate Very greatfull he helped me reach the best outcome

Logan Traun

Atty Rocky Brancato is an excellent attorney. He genuinely cares about his clients. You would not find anyone else as compassionate and talented as he is as a lawyer. I would 100% recommend him.

Ana R.

Rocky is an excellent attorney! He demonstrates his passion, dedication and strong work ethic for every single case he accepts. He always go that extra mile to gain his clients trust and satisfaction. Highly recommended!

Bryan N.

Great Lawyer

Joe C.

Thank you for everything!

Kali L.

Attorney Brancato was phenomenal. If I could give him more than 5 stars I would. Very professional, polite, and just overall AMAZING. The only one that actually took the time to help me with a specific case I had for the past few years. I can’t begin to thank him enough.

Keelie

Our family had a great experience with Attorney Rocky Brancato. I wish I could give him more than five stars!

Lola J.

Very thorough and willing to help. I’m glad I chose to contact this office. I always worry about being given the run around but not here I was even given a call back to be sure that he didn’t miss anything. Thanks A+

Mark D.

Rocky went out of his way to help me. he is a very good man

David N.

Attorney Rocky Brancato of the Brancato Law Firm, P.A. Delivered on short notice in our family’s time of need. Fast response, humble and affordable.

Jose V.

Visit Us

Tampa Office
620 E Twiggs St Suite #205

Tampa, FL 33602

Located minutes from the Hillsborough County Courthouse.
Map Shield Image

Contact Us Now

Free Legal Consultation (813) 727-7159

Rocky Brancato in his office in Tampa

Meet Rocky Brancato

For over 25 years, Rocky Brancato has been a prominent force in Tampa Bay’s legal arena. Rocky rose to second-in-command at Tampa Bay’s largest defense firm before launching Brancato Law Firm, P.A. As a former specialized major crimes attorney for serious offenses like...