Filming an arrest on your phone is legal, but the way you film it can get you arrested. As a former police academy instructor, a former Chief Operations Officer of the Hillsborough County Public Defender’s Office, where I oversaw a staff of over 100 attorneys, and the founder of The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., a Tampa criminal defense firm, I have seen these encounters from the training side and the defense side. Our attorneys defend people arrested while recording police, and the cases usually turn on distance, warnings, and what the video itself shows.

Is it legal to record police in Tampa?

Yes. In Smith v. City of Cumming, 212 F.3d 1332 (11th Cir. 2000), a Georgia couple sued after police kept Mr. Smith from videotaping officers. The Eleventh Circuit, whose decisions bind federal courts in Florida, held that people have “a First Amendment right, subject to reasonable time, manner and place restrictions, to photograph or videotape police conduct,” though it found the Smiths had not shown the officers violated that right. The right covers sidewalks, streets, parks, and other public places in Tampa and Hillsborough County.

The right has limits. In Crocker v. Beatty, 995 F.3d 1232 (11th Cir. 2021), a driver stopped on the median of I-95 in Martin County to photograph a fatal crash, and a deputy took his phone. The Eleventh Circuit held the deputy had qualified immunity on the First Amendment claim because it was not clearly established that Smith protected photographing from a highway median at a chaotic crash scene. Crocker still won $1,000 from a jury on his separate Fourth Amendment claim over the phone seizure. The lesson: film from a lawful place, and the seizure of your phone can be challenged even when the recording claim fails.

Scholars have tied this right to the role phone video now plays in public debate. Professor Seth F. Kreimer’s article “Pervasive Image Capture and the First Amendment: Memory, Discourse, and the Right to Record,” 159 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 335 (2011), argues that recording images is protected expression, not mere conduct. Encounters with police are common: the Bureau of Justice Statistics report Contacts Between Police and the Public, 2022 found that 19% of U.S. residents age 16 or older, about 49.2 million people, had contact with police in 2022.

What does Florida’s 25-foot buffer law, section 843.31, prohibit?

Section 843.31, Florida Statutes, created by chapter 2024-85, Laws of Florida (SB 184) and effective January 1, 2025, makes it a crime to knowingly and willfully violate a first responder’s verbal warning not to approach and to approach or remain within 25 feet with the intent to impede or interfere with the responder’s duties, threaten the responder with physical harm, or harass the responder. “First responder” includes law enforcement officers, correctional probation officers, firefighters, and emergency medical care providers.

A violation is a second-degree misdemeanor, punishable by up to 60 days in jail and a fine of up to $500 under sections 775.082 and 775.083. Standing within 25 feet is not a crime by itself, and neither is recording. The intent element is where most of these cases are won or lost.

What other charges do people face for filming police?

The most common charge is resisting an officer without violence under section 843.02, Florida Statutes, a first-degree misdemeanor punishable by up to one year in jail. That charge requires proof that the officer was engaged in the lawful execution of a legal duty and that the person obstructed or opposed it. Filming, by itself, is not obstruction. Refusing a lawful order to move, physically blocking an officer, or stepping into an active scene can be.

In Hillsborough County, these charges are misdemeanors filed in county court, and a person taken into custody is booked at the Orient Road Jail. Our Hillsborough County criminal defense attorney team reviews body camera footage, the bystander’s own video, and dispatch records to test the officer’s account of distance and intent.

Can police make you stop recording or delete your video?

Officers can give lawful orders that affect where you stand, but they cannot lawfully order you to delete a recording, and a warrantless search of your phone is generally prohibited under the Fourth Amendment. If an officer seizes your phone as “evidence,” do not consent to a search, do not unlock it, and say clearly that you do not consent. That refusal preserves a later motion to suppress and, as Crocker shows, a seizure claim.

Does Florida’s wiretap law ban recording police audio?

Usually not for police encounters in public. Section 934.03, Florida Statutes, makes it a third-degree felony to intercept an “oral communication” without the consent of all parties, but section 934.02 defines oral communication as one made with a justified expectation that it is not being intercepted. In Waite v. State, No. 5D2023-1354 (Fla. 5th DCA Aug. 16, 2024), a Citrus County man was charged with intercepting oral communications for secretly recording his conversations with on-duty sheriff’s deputies about official business. The Fifth District held the deputies had no reasonable expectation of privacy in those conversations and reversed the denial of his motion to dismiss those charges.

There is a caution. A concurring judge in Waite noted that phone calls are “wire” communications, not oral ones, and that secretly recording a phone call with an officer could be charged under a different part of the statute. Recording an officer you can see in public is very different from secretly recording a private phone call, and the safest course is to record openly.

How can you film police safely in Tampa?

1. Record openly from a lawful place. Sidewalks and public property are best; do not stand in a roadway, median, or active crime scene.
2. Keep your distance. Use zoom rather than stepping closer. Staying 25 feet back avoids a section 843.31 charge entirely.
3. Obey a warning to back up. Move, keep recording, and say aloud that you are complying so the video captures it.
4. Do not touch officers or equipment, and do not block anyone’s path.
5. Do not unlock or hand over your phone. State that you do not consent to a search.
6. Save and back up the video. Upload it to cloud storage quickly; it may be the best evidence in your case or someone else’s.

Frequently asked questions

Is it illegal to film police within 25 feet in Florida?

No, not by itself. Section 843.31 requires a verbal warning, a knowing violation, and intent to interfere, threaten, or harass, so filming within 25 feet without that intent is not a crime under that statute. The Brancato Law Firm uses the video and the officer’s own body camera to contest the intent element in these cases.

Can I be arrested for recording a traffic stop in Tampa?

Recording a traffic stop is legal, including your own stop, as long as you follow lawful commands and do not interfere. Our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm defend drivers and passengers when a recording leads to a resisting charge, and we often use that same recording as the defense.

Can police take my phone because I recorded them?

Officers sometimes seize phones as evidence, but searching the phone generally requires a warrant or your consent. The Brancato Law Firm challenges unlawful phone seizures and searches with a motion to suppress through our Hillsborough County defense practice.

Can charges for filming police be dropped in Florida?

Yes. Section 843.31 and resisting charges are frequently dropped or dismissed when video shows the person kept distance, complied with warnings, or did not interfere. The Brancato Law Firm gathers bystander video and body camera footage early, before it is overwritten.

Is it legal to record police inside a police station in Florida?

The answer depends on the area, because lobbies and secure areas are not the same as a public sidewalk, and federal courts have treated recording inside government buildings differently from recording outdoors. Our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm advise checking posted rules and leaving rather than arguing if told to stop in a non-public area.

For how this fits into the rest of a case, see our guide to each stage of a Florida criminal case.

Talk to a Tampa criminal defense attorney about a recording arrest

Video from the scene, yours and the officers’, is the evidence that wins these cases, and body camera footage is not kept forever. Call The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., founded by Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney Rocky Brancato, at (813) 727-7159 as soon as you are released so our attorneys can request it. You can call us at any hour, and our office is two blocks from the courthouse. Our firm has Spanish-speaking staff, and attorney Jean-Luc Adrien speaks Spanish, Haitian Creole, and French. Read our guide for Spanish-speaking criminal defense clients in Tampa. For more about our defense strategies, visit our Hillsborough County Criminal Defense page.

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A.
620 E. Twiggs Street, Suite 205, Tampa, FL 33602
(813) 727-7159
Serving Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. is a Tampa-based criminal defense practice. We are not affiliated with any other Brancato-named law firms.

If police seized a phone, a camera, or a video system in your case and the data is now gone, you may be wondering whether the case can survive without it. As founder of The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., a Tampa criminal defense firm, and a veteran of the Major Crimes Unit, where I handled homicide cases, I have tried cases where the State’s own mishandling became the center of the defense. Our attorneys work with forensic experts in data recovery, video, and digital devices who can testify about what police should have done and what was lost because they did not.

What happens when police destroy evidence in Florida?

When police destroy evidence, the court first decides whether the evidence was materially exculpatory or only potentially useful. Exculpatory evidence is evidence that would clearly have helped clear the defendant. Potentially useful evidence is evidence that might have helped if it had been tested or viewed. For potentially useful evidence, the defense must prove bad faith to win dismissal or exclusion.

In Arizona v. Youngblood, 488 U.S. 51 (1988), police failed to refrigerate a victim’s clothing and test semen samples in a child sexual assault case. The U.S. Supreme Court held that “unless a criminal defendant can show bad faith on the part of the police, failure to preserve potentially useful evidence does not constitute a denial of due process of law.” The Court also said the defendant “is free to argue to the finder of fact” that a test police never ran might have cleared him.

Florida applies the same rule. In Patterson v. State, 199 So. 3d 253 (Fla. 2016), an arson defendant’s burned truck was destroyed by his insurer after the State released it, before he was ever charged. The Florida Supreme Court held that the bad faith requirement applies even when the defense asks only to exclude evidence rather than dismiss the case, and it found no bad faith on that record.

Can a case be dismissed because police lost a video?

A case can be dismissed for a lost video only in narrow circumstances. In State v. Hampton, 113 So. 3d 109 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013), a trial court dismissed a charge after the State failed to get surveillance video from the store where the defendant was arrested, and the store said any tape would have been erased within 24 hours. The Fifth District reversed, holding that the video was only potentially useful for impeaching the deputy and that the defense had not proven bad faith.

Legal scholars have long debated this standard. Norman C. Bay’s article Old Blood, Bad Blood, and Youngblood: Due Process, Lost Evidence, and the Limits of Bad Faith, 86 Wash. U. L. Rev. 241 (2008) examines the different approaches states have taken in adopting or rejecting Youngblood. Florida has kept the bad faith test, so in most cases the destroyed evidence becomes a trial issue rather than a ground for dismissal.

How can destroyed evidence help the defense at trial?

Destroyed evidence helps the defense when the jury learns that the State had the evidence, understood its value, and failed to keep it. The defense can cross-examine the officers about the protocol they skipped, call an expert to explain how the data should have been preserved, and argue that the missing evidence leaves reasonable doubt. Jurors understand that if the evidence had proven the State’s case, the State would have made sure they saw it.

Digital evidence is especially easy to lose. In 2020, publicly funded crime laboratories in the United States received about 27,000 requests for digital evidence analysis, and only 22.9% of labs performed that kind of work, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics report Publicly Funded Forensic Crime Laboratories, 2020. In many cases, the officer who first handles a phone or camera system is not a trained forensic examiner.

Case study: the destroyed surveillance video in a murder trial

Our firm defended a man charged with second-degree murder after a fatal fight with his roommate inside their shared home. He said he acted in self-defense. A surveillance camera in the home pointed out a window, and based on its angle and field of view it would have captured key moments of the fight.

Police seized the camera, watched part of the footage, and confirmed in their reports that it showed the incident. They did not make a forensic download, which is a complete bit-by-bit copy of the device’s data that preserves the original. Instead, officers worked with the device directly, and the footage was lost.

What the forensic expert found

We retained a forensic data recovery expert and obtained a court order to send the camera to the expert. The expert had two jobs: recover any remaining video, and determine whether the device had been handled according to forensic protocol. His conclusion was clear: no data remained on the device. The video that police confirmed existed was gone.

The expert could not recover the footage, and that was not the point of his testimony. The point was that police had critical evidence, failed to preserve it, and destroyed it through their handling.

Two defenses that supported each other

At trial we presented self-defense and the destruction of evidence together. Under section 776.012, Florida Statutes, a person is justified in using deadly force if he reasonably believes it is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm. My client testified to the fight as he lived it. The expert, whose testimony had to meet the reliability standard in section 90.702, Florida Statutes, explained the protocol for preserving digital video, that police skipped the forensic download, and that their handling destroyed the footage.

The message to the jury was direct: the State had evidence that could have shown exactly what happened, the State destroyed it, and now it asked the jury to convict without it.

What should you do if evidence in your case was lost or destroyed?

Tell your attorney about every device and camera involved as early as possible, so the defense can trace what police seized and what happened to it. Our attorneys follow five steps in these cases:

1. Review every police report for evidence that was seized, viewed, or mentioned but never produced in discovery.
2. Demand the evidence in discovery and ask for a court order to examine any device independently.
3. Retain a forensic expert even when recovery looks unlikely, because testimony about the lost evidence can matter as much as the evidence.
4. Move for dismissal or exclusion when the record shows bad faith.
5. Build the destruction into the trial defense, so it supports the client’s own account.

When the case is still under investigation and no charge has been filed, our attorneys can send preservation demands and track devices as part of our representation before charges are filed. In a homicide case, our Tampa homicide attorney page explains how our firm prepares for trial from the first week.

Official misconduct is a recurring factor in wrongful convictions. Of the 147 exonerations recorded nationwide in 2024, at least 104, or 71%, involved official misconduct, according to the National Registry of Exonerations 2024 Annual Report. Mishandled evidence is not always misconduct, but juries take the State’s handling of evidence seriously when the defense shows them the details.

Frequently asked questions

What is spoliation of evidence in a criminal case?

Spoliation is the destruction, alteration, or failure to preserve evidence relevant to a case. In a Florida criminal case, spoliation by the State leads to dismissal or exclusion only with proof of bad faith or clearly exculpatory evidence, and The Brancato Law Firm otherwise uses it at trial through cross-examination and expert testimony.

What is a forensic download?

A forensic download is a complete, bit-by-bit copy of all the data on a device, including deleted files and metadata, made before anyone examines the original. Our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm ask in every digital evidence case whether police made one, because skipping it is often where data is lost.

Should I hire a data recovery expert if the evidence is already gone?

Often, yes. Even when nothing can be recovered, an expert can testify about proper preservation and how police departed from it, and The Brancato Law Firm retains these experts through the network described on our Tampa forensic science attorney page.

Does the State have to preserve all evidence?

No. Under Arizona v. Youngblood, police do not have a constitutional duty to preserve everything that might conceivably help, only to avoid bad faith destruction of potentially useful evidence. Our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm send preservation demands early so the record shows exactly what the State was asked to keep.

Can police destroying evidence lead to a not guilty verdict?

It can contribute to one. The Brancato Law Firm won a not guilty verdict in a second-degree murder trial where police destroyed surveillance video, and our post on why expert witnesses matter in major crimes cases explains how experts carry that kind of defense.

What if the evidence was never collected at all?

Evidence police never collected is treated much like lost evidence: the case goes forward, and the defense can show the jury the gap. Our firm’s guide to why a defense attorney should visit the crime scene describes how The Brancato Law Firm finds cameras and witnesses police missed.

For how this fits into the rest of a case, see our step-by-step guide to what happens in a Florida criminal case.

Talk to our attorneys about lost or destroyed evidence

Our attorneys can start by tracing every device and recording police seized in your case and demanding that what remains be preserved. The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., founded by Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney Rocky Brancato, handles murder and other serious felony cases from our office two blocks from the courthouse; call (813) 727-7159 at any hour, because each week can cost evidence. Our firm has Spanish-speaking staff, and attorney Jean-Luc Adrien speaks Spanish, Haitian Creole, and French. For more about our defense strategies, visit our Forensic Science page.

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A.
620 E. Twiggs Street, Suite 205, Tampa, FL 33602
(813) 727-7159
Serving Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. is a Tampa-based criminal defense practice. We are not affiliated with any other Brancato-named law firms.

Most trials are decided by facts the jury can picture, and police reports rarely give the jury the full picture. I learned that in the Major Crimes Unit and in more than 150 jury trials to verdict. As founder of The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., a Tampa criminal defense firm, I still walk the scene myself before trial and go to the evidence room when physical evidence decides the case. Our attorneys pair that work with a network of forensic experts who can explain to a jury what the State’s investigation missed.

Why should a defense attorney visit the crime scene?

A defense attorney should visit the crime scene because the scene holds evidence that no report describes. Police need only probable cause to arrest, and once they have it, many officers move on to the next call. The State still has to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt at trial, and the gap between those two standards is where an independent investigation pays off.

Police also clear fewer cases than most people assume. In 2020, law enforcement agencies in Hillsborough County cleared 33.6 index offenses for every 100 reported, according to the Florida Department of Law Enforcement’s County and Municipal Offense Report for 2020. Investigators working that volume often stop gathering evidence once an arrest is made, which is why our firm treats the arrest report as the starting point for its own investigation.

What can a crime scene visit uncover?

A crime scene visit can uncover cameras, witnesses, and physical facts that test every part of the State’s story. The visit lets the attorney compare the police report against the real layout: whether a witness could see what she described, whether the timeline fits the distances, and whether lighting allowed an identification.

Before the visit, our attorneys often study the location on Google Street View to spot likely camera positions. Street View images can be years old, so they are a starting point. Nothing replaces standing where the witness stood.

How do our attorneys conduct a crime scene visit?

Our attorneys work through every scene with the same five steps, so nothing depends on memory at trial:

1. Photograph the location from every angle, including the witnesses’ claimed vantage points.
2. Map every camera, and send preservation letters to the owners of any that might hold footage.
3. Canvass nearby businesses and homes for witnesses police never interviewed.
4. Measure distances and note lighting at the time of day the incident happened.
5. Compare each detail against the police report and the depositions, and mark every conflict for cross-examination.

When a case may turn on disputed facts, our firm can send an investigator early to document the scene and find cameras before footage is overwritten. When the case heads to trial, I go personally. Knowing the distances and sightlines firsthand makes cross-examination precise, and an officer who knows the defense attorney has walked the scene cannot comfortably exaggerate a distance or misremember a layout.

How long is surveillance video kept?

Surveillance video is often kept for only days or weeks before the system records over it, and some systems keep far less. In State v. Hampton, 113 So. 3d 109 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013), a deputy went back to the store where the defendant was arrested to get the video and was told any tape would have been erased within 24 hours. The appeals court reversed the dismissal of the charge because the defense had not proven the State acted in bad faith.

That case shows why waiting is dangerous. Once footage is gone, it cannot be recovered, and a court will not dismiss the case just because police failed to collect it. If you know about cameras where the incident happened, tell your attorney the day you hire the firm. When a person is under investigation and not yet charged, our attorneys send preservation letters as part of our representation before charges are filed.

Case study: the community pool battery trial

A crime scene visit won a battery trial for our firm even though the video itself was long gone. I took over the case from another attorney. The State’s case looked strong on paper: an alleged victim said my client hit him during an argument in a community pool parking lot, and a woman who watched from a distance said she saw my client swinging his arms before the man fell.

My client admitted the argument and admitted raising his voice and gesturing. He insisted he never touched the man. With his permission, I told the jury that my client, who is Hispanic, talks with his hands when he is upset, and that the eyewitness mistook passionate gesturing for punches. Standing alone, that defense asked the jury to believe my client over two witnesses.

What the scene showed

Before trial, I drove to the pool and walked the parking lot. I photographed cameras mounted on poles and building corners with a clear view of where the incident happened. The footage had been recorded over long before I took the case. Neither the police nor the previous attorney had asked for it.

The cross-examination

The cameras became the center of the officer’s cross-examination. I walked him through his duty to collect evidence, the difference between probable cause and proof beyond a reasonable doubt, and the value of video in a he-said, she-said case. He could not recall cameras at the pool. I showed him Defense Exhibit One, my photographs of the parking lot, and he agreed the cameras were there and that no one had collected the video.

Why should a defense attorney inspect the physical evidence?

A defense attorney should inspect the physical evidence because lab reports describe test results, not how the evidence was handled before testing. Florida’s discovery rule, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.220, requires the prosecutor to let the defense inspect, copy, test, and photograph the tangible evidence in the case. Many attorneys never use that right and see the evidence for the first time in front of the jury.

The backlog at crime labs is one reason handling matters. In 2020, publicly funded forensic crime laboratories in the United States received 3.3 million requests for service and ended the year with about 710,900 requests not completed within 30 days, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics report Publicly Funded Forensic Crime Laboratories, 2020. Evidence that waits months for testing sits in a property room the whole time, and how it sits there can matter as much as the test.

What does our firm look for in the evidence room?

Our attorneys look for anything that undermines the reliability of the State’s evidence: storage conditions, packaging, and signs of handling. I schedule the inspection close enough to trial that the details are fresh for cross-examination, but early enough to file motions and retain experts if we find a problem. I bring an investigator with a camera, and in a capital case my trial partner comes too, because two sets of eyes matter when a life is at stake. The lead detective or the evidence custodian is usually present.

Case study: the cold hit DNA capital case

An evidence room inspection took the death penalty off the table in a capital case our firm defended. The State sought death based on a DNA “cold hit” in a homicide more than 20 years old. Investigators had collected a cigarette butt at the scene, and when its DNA was run through CODIS, the national DNA database, it matched my client, who was already on death row for a separate homicide.

Modern DNA testing can amplify a usable profile from a tiny sample, such as saliva on a cigarette, and that is why decades-old cases now produce cold hits. On paper, the case looked airtight. My trial partner, our investigator, and I spent a full day in the police evidence room, photographing every container and recording which items shared packaging.

We found that the cigarette butt, the only evidence tying my client to the crime, had been stored in the same box as the victim’s rape kit for more than 20 years. Two items of biological evidence sitting together for two decades created a real risk that DNA moved from one to the other.

The Daubert challenge

I filed a Daubert motion challenging the reliability of the DNA evidence. Under section 90.702, Florida Statutes, expert testimony is admissible only if it is based on sufficient facts or data, is the product of reliable principles and methods, and applies those methods reliably to the facts of the case. The Florida Supreme Court adopted that standard as a rule of evidence in In re Amendments to the Florida Evidence Code, 278 So. 3d 551 (Fla. 2019), replacing the older Frye test.

What happens when police fail to collect or preserve evidence?

When police fail to collect or preserve evidence, the charge usually goes forward, but the defense can put that failure in front of the jury. In Arizona v. Youngblood, 488 U.S. 51 (1988), police failed to refrigerate clothing and test semen samples in a child sexual assault case. The U.S. Supreme Court held that losing evidence that is only potentially useful does not violate due process unless the defendant shows police bad faith. The Court added that a defendant “is free to argue to the finder of fact” that a test police never performed might have cleared him.

Florida follows that rule. In Patterson v. State, 199 So. 3d 253 (Fla. 2016), an arson defendant’s burned truck was destroyed before his arrest, and the Florida Supreme Court held that Youngblood‘s bad faith requirement applies whether the defense asks for dismissal or only for exclusion of evidence. Legal relief for lost evidence is hard to win. What our attorneys can do in nearly every case is show the jury, through cross-examination and expert testimony, what the investigation failed to collect. Our case study on what happens when police destroy evidence shows that approach in a murder trial.

Is it ineffective assistance if a lawyer never investigates?

It can be. Under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), a convicted defendant claiming ineffective assistance must show that the lawyer’s performance was deficient and that there is a reasonable probability the result would have been different without the error. The Supreme Court said counsel “has a duty to make reasonable investigations or to make a reasonable decision that makes particular investigations unnecessary.”

A failure to visit a scene or inspect evidence supports a claim only when it changed the outcome, such as footage that would have cleared the client or a storage problem that would have kept out a lab result. Inadequate defense work shows up in national data. Of the 147 exonerations recorded nationwide in 2024, 48, or 33%, involved inadequate legal defense, and 38, or 26%, involved mistaken witness identification, according to the National Registry of Exonerations 2024 Annual Report.

Why does investigation timing matter?

Timing matters because evidence disappears on its own schedule, not the court’s. Video is recorded over, witnesses move, lighting and landscaping change, and property rooms purge items under retention policies. Biological samples degrade over time. The defense that starts investigating at arrest has more to work with than the defense that starts at the trial date.

Our attorneys start with the evidence most likely to vanish: cameras first, then witnesses, then the scene itself, and then a request to inspect the physical evidence once discovery is under way. For cases built on DNA, prints, or other lab work, our forensic science defense attorney page explains how we retain experts to review the State’s testing. Our post on why expert witnesses matter in major crimes cases covers when to bring one in.

Frequently asked questions

Why don’t police always collect surveillance video?

Police often stop collecting evidence once they have probable cause for an arrest, and some officers never check for cameras at locations without obvious security systems. Our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm canvass for cameras ourselves and send preservation letters the day we are hired.

Can I visit the crime scene myself?

You can visit a public place, but it is usually better to let your attorney or a professional investigator do it. The Brancato Law Firm documents scenes so the photographs can be authenticated at trial under section 90.901, Florida Statutes, and so you avoid any contact with witnesses.

What is an evidence view in a Florida criminal case?

An evidence view is a scheduled inspection of the physical evidence at the law enforcement property room, where the defense examines each item and photographs how it was packaged and stored. Attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm request evidence views in cases where DNA, weapons, drugs, or other physical items will decide the verdict.

How long does an evidence inspection take?

A simple case can take a few hours, and a capital or multi-scene case can take a full day or longer. The Brancato Law Firm plans the inspection with enough time left before trial to file motions and retain experts if we find a problem.

What is a Daubert motion?

A Daubert motion asks the judge to exclude expert testimony that does not meet the reliability requirements of section 90.702, Florida Statutes. Our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm use Daubert motions to challenge lab results when storage, handling, or testing methods make them unreliable, as described on our Tampa forensic evidence attorney page.

Which cases benefit most from a scene visit or evidence inspection?

Any case that depends on what happened at a place or on a physical item benefits: battery, domestic violence, robbery, homicide, DUI crashes, eyewitness identification cases, and DNA cases. The Brancato Law Firm decides early which investigation each case needs, and our DNA evidence defense case study shows how a lab result can be challenged.

For how this fits into the rest of a case, see our stage-by-stage guide to the Florida criminal case process.

Talk to our attorneys before the evidence is gone

Call now if there were cameras where your case happened, because most footage is recorded over long before the first court date. The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., founded by Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney Rocky Brancato, can send preservation letters, walk the scene, and request an evidence view; call (813) 727-7159 at any hour. Our office is two blocks from the courthouse. Our firm has Spanish-speaking staff, and attorney Jean-Luc Adrien speaks Spanish, Haitian Creole, and French. For more about our defense strategies, visit our Forensic Science page.

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A.
620 E. Twiggs Street, Suite 205, Tampa, FL 33602
(813) 727-7159
Serving Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. is a Tampa-based criminal defense practice. We are not affiliated with any other Brancato-named law firms.

Most DUI arrests in Tampa are decided by what happened in the five minutes after the driver stepped out of the car. As a former police academy instructor, I know how officers are trained to give and score these exercises, and how often the roadside version falls short of the training. I’m Rocky Brancato, founder of The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., a Tampa criminal defense firm, and a member of the National College for DUI Defense. Our attorneys review every second of roadside video in a DUI case, because that is where the State’s case is usually weakest.

What are the three standardized field sobriety tests?

The three standardized field sobriety tests are horizontal gaze nystagmus (HGN), the walk-and-turn, and the one-leg stand. They were developed for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), and NHTSA’s training manual describes them as the only field sobriety tests for which validated clues have been identified. Anything else an officer asks a driver to do, such as reciting the alphabet or touching a finger to the nose, has no validated scoring at all.

The clue lists and arrest criteria above come from the NHTSA-funded A Florida Validation Study of the Standardized Field Sobriety Test (S.F.S.T.) Battery (Burns and Dioquino, 1997), which was conducted with the Pinellas County Sheriff’s Office.

How accurate are field sobriety tests?

Field sobriety tests are less accurate than most jurors assume, especially near the legal limit. NHTSA’s main validation study, Stuster and Burns, Validation of the Standardized Field Sobriety Test Battery at BACs Below 0.10 Percent (1998), tested 297 drivers with San Diego police. At the 0.08 level, officers using all three exercises were correct 91% of the time. That number drops in the range where most contested cases sit. For drivers between 0.04 and 0.08, the officers’ decisions to release were correct only 52% of the time.

Independent researchers have questioned even those figures. A 2005 article in the Journal of Forensic Sciences, Statistical evaluation of standardized field sobriety tests, re-analyzed the San Diego data and concluded that accuracy depends heavily on blood alcohol level and is “much lower than” the 91% originally reported. The tests appear best at identifying drivers who are well above 0.08, not drivers near the line.

Real roadsides make the problem worse. The validation studies were run under controlled conditions. A shoulder on Interstate 4 at 1 a.m., with traffic passing, headlights flashing, uneven pavement, and a nervous driver in dress shoes, is not a controlled condition. Injuries, inner-ear problems, age, weight, and footwear all affect balance.

Do I have to do field sobriety tests in Florida?

No statute requires a driver to perform field sobriety exercises. Florida’s implied consent law, section 316.1932, Florida Statutes, covers breath, blood, and urine tests after a lawful arrest. The roadside exercises come before arrest and are outside that statute.

Refusing has consequences, though. In State v. Taylor, 648 So. 2d 701 (Fla. 1995), the Florida Supreme Court held that a driver’s refusal to perform field sobriety tests is admissible at trial as evidence of consciousness of guilt, as long as the officer had reasonable suspicion of DUI and warned the driver that refusing could have adverse consequences. In September 2026 the Fourth District applied the same rule in Paul v. State, No. 4D2025-0899 (Fla. 4th DCA Sept. 2, 2026), holding that a prosecutor may argue that refusing the roadside exercises and a breath test shows consciousness of guilt.

The Second District, which hears Hillsborough County appeals, has also said consent is not the issue. In State v. Liefert, 247 So. 2d 18 (Fla. 2d DCA 1971), the court held that an officer who saw weaving and smelled alcohol could require the driver to take part in physical sobriety tests, and that consent was immaterial. The real question in most cases is whether the officer had the legal basis to ask.

When can an officer in Hillsborough County ask for field sobriety tests?

An officer needs reasonable suspicion that the driver is impaired before requesting field sobriety tests. The Second District said so directly in State v. Ameqrane, 39 So. 3d 339 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010), a Hillsborough County case: “To request that a driver submit to field sobriety tests, a police officer must have reasonable suspicion that the individual is driving under the influence.” In that case, speeding at 4 a.m., the odor of alcohol, and glassy, bloodshot eyes were enough, and the court reversed a suppression order.

Ameqrane shows how this issue is argued. A stop for a burned-out tag light, with no bad driving and only an odor of alcohol, is a very different case from weaving across three lanes. When the officer moved to the roadside exercises without reasonable suspicion, our attorneys file a motion to suppress everything that followed: the exercises, the arrest, and the breath test. The Fifth District applied the same rule in State v. Johnson, 361 So. 3d 911 (Fla. 5th DCA 2023), holding that a driver can be required to perform the exercises once reasonable suspicion exists. Learn more about suppression on our Tampa DUI lawyer page.

How do Florida courts limit field sobriety evidence at trial?

Florida courts limit how the State describes the exercises. In State v. Meador, 674 So. 2d 826 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), the court held that the walk-and-turn, one-leg stand, and similar exercises are admissible only as an officer’s lay observations of the driver. The court warned that calling them a “test,” or saying the driver “passed,” “failed,” or scored “points,” gives “these layperson observations an aura of scientific validity.”

Meador treated HGN differently. Because the eye test depends on scientific principles, the State must lay a scientific foundation before the jury hears it. In practice that means a properly qualified witness and a properly administered test. Roadside HGN tests are sometimes given with the driver facing passing headlights or flashing emergency lights, which can affect the result.

How do our attorneys challenge field sobriety evidence?

Our attorneys challenge field sobriety evidence by comparing the video, frame by frame, with the officer’s report and with NHTSA’s own instructions. The process usually looks like this:

1. Get the body camera and dash camera video. We watch for whether the officer gave complete instructions, demonstrated correctly, and stopped the driver from starting early, then count the clues ourselves.
2. Check the surface and conditions. Gravel, slopes, wet grass, wind, and passing traffic all affect balance.
3. Look for medical and physical explanations. Knee and back injuries, inner-ear conditions, weight, age, fatigue, and footwear affect balance.
4. Compare the report with the video. Reports are often written hours later. When a report lists six walk-and-turn clues and the video shows two, the officer’s credibility becomes the issue.
5. Hold the State to Meador at trial. We move to keep the words “test,” “pass,” “fail,” and “points” out of the officer’s testimony, and we object to HGN without a proper foundation.

This work produces results. In one of our DUI trials, the scene video showed no impairment and no resistance, and the jury found our client not guilty of both DUI and resisting an officer. Other DUIs have been reduced to reckless driving because the roadside evidence would not hold up. These and other outcomes are on our case results page. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

How many DUI cases does Hillsborough County handle?

Hillsborough County handles thousands of DUI cases a year. From October 1, 2024 through September 30, 2025, the MADD court monitoring program tracked more than 4,100 DUI cases in Hillsborough County, according to the Florida Department of Transportation’s FY2025 Highway Safety Annual Report. With that volume, the roadside portion of many arrests is done quickly, and the video often shows shortcuts the report leaves out.

That volume also explains why prosecutors negotiate. When our attorneys show the assigned prosecutor that the roadside exercises were given wrong, the State has to decide whether its remaining evidence can carry a trial. For what comes after the arrest, read What Happens After a DUI Arrest in Hillsborough County and How to Fight a DUI Charge in Hillsborough County.

What should you do if you were arrested after field sobriety tests?

Move quickly on two fronts. The criminal case and the license suspension run on separate tracks, and the license challenge has a 10-day deadline from the arrest. Our post on how to protect your driver’s license after a DUI arrest explains that hearing.

• Write down everything you remember about the stop and the exercises, including the surface, the lighting, what you were wearing, and any injuries.
• List any medical conditions that affect balance or eye movement, with the names of your doctors.
• Do not discuss the arrest on social media or by text.
• Keep your paperwork, including the citation and any property receipt.
• Talk to a DUI defense lawyer before your arraignment, so the video can be requested and reviewed early.

Frequently asked questions about field sobriety tests in Florida

Can I refuse field sobriety tests in Florida?

Yes. Florida does not require a driver to perform roadside sobriety exercises, but under State v. Taylor, 648 So. 2d 701 (Fla. 1995), the refusal can be used at trial if the officer warned you of the consequences. The Brancato Law Firm reviews the video of what the officer actually said, because a missing warning or a missing basis for the request can keep a refusal out of evidence.

Are field sobriety tests scientific evidence in Florida?

Only the HGN eye test is treated as scientific in Florida, under State v. Meador, 674 So. 2d 826 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); the balance exercises are lay observations. Our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm use that ruling to keep officers from telling jurors that a driver “failed.”

Can a DUI be dismissed because of how the field sobriety tests were done?

Yes, it can contribute to a dismissal or reduction when the exercises were requested without reasonable suspicion or were given and scored wrong. The Brancato Law Firm has had DUIs reduced to reckless driving and has won a not guilty verdict where the scene video showed no impairment. Read more on our Tampa DUI defense page.

Can a medical condition make me fail a field sobriety test?

Yes. Back, knee, and hip injuries, inner-ear disorders, some neurological conditions, and some medications affect balance and eye movement. Our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm gather medical records early and, when needed, consult experts who can explain to a jury why a sober person struggled.

Do field sobriety tests matter if I took a breath test?

Yes. They often matter more than people think, because the officer’s roadside observations are the State’s evidence of impairment when the breath result is close to 0.08 or is challenged. The Brancato Law Firm attacks both, and our post on challenging Intoxilyzer maintenance explains the breath side.

What does the walk-and-turn test measure?

It is designed to measure divided attention, meaning the ability to listen to instructions, balance, and walk at the same time. The Brancato Law Firm counts the clues ourselves from the video, because officers often record clues that the footage does not show.

Call a Tampa DUI defense attorney before your arraignment

The first two weeks after a DUI arrest decide what evidence still exists and whether your license stays valid. Call The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. at (813) 727-7159. The firm was founded by Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney Rocky Brancato, and our attorneys will request the roadside video, review it against NHTSA’s own standards, and file the license challenge within the 10-day deadline. You can call us at any hour. Our firm has Spanish-speaking staff, and attorney Jean-Luc Adrien speaks Spanish, Haitian Creole, and French. We also offer criminal defense in Spanish and Haitian Creole.

For more about our defense strategies, visit our Tampa DUI Defense page.

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A.

620 E. Twiggs Street, Suite 205, Tampa, FL 33602

(813) 727-7159

Serving Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. is a Tampa-based criminal defense practice. We are not affiliated with any other Brancato-named law firms.

Each case is unique, and past results do not guarantee future outcomes. This article is general information, not legal advice.