A Florida prosecutor charging a lewd exhibition case has always had to answer one question first: did the child see or sense what happened? As founder of The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., a Tampa criminal defense firm, a former Major Crimes Unit attorney who handled homicide, sex crime, and child abuse cases, and a former Chief Operations Officer of the Hillsborough County Public Defender’s Office, where I oversaw a staff of over 100 attorneys, I have tried cases where that question decided everything. On October 1, 2026, the Legislature took that question away for a new category of cases, and our attorneys are already adjusting how we defend them.

This guide covers what the new law prohibits, the 1992 Florida Supreme Court decision behind it, how the bill changed in committee, what it means for plea negotiations and registration, and how these charges are defended.

What Does Florida’s New Section 800.035 Prohibit?

Section 800.035, Florida Statutes, creates the crime of “indecent exposure of sexual organs while observing a child.” A person commits it if, while observing a child under 16 for the purpose of his or her own sexual arousal or gratification, the person does either of two things:

• Intentionally exposes his or her sexual organs in a lewd or lascivious manner; or
• Intentionally performs any sexual act that does not involve physical or sexual contact with the child, including masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse, sexual bestiality, or simulated sexual activity.

The statute defines “observing” as “intentionally viewing another person under circumstances in which the offender is reasonably capable of being seen by the person being viewed.” It then adds the key sentence: it is not a defense that the child “was not aware of any specific conduct on the part of the offender or did not see the offender’s sexual organs.”

The offense is a third-degree felony, punishable by up to five years in prison and a $5,000 fine. Two exceptions apply: a mother breastfeeding her baby, and a person who is merely nude in a place set apart for nudity. The law was passed as CS/CS/HB 1525, signed on June 16, 2026, and published as chapter 2026-159, Laws of Florida.

Why Did Florida Create This Law?

Florida created section 800.035 to reach conduct that the existing lewd exhibition statute could not. Lewd or lascivious exhibition under section 800.04(7) requires the act to happen “in the presence of” a child under 16. The Florida Supreme Court has read that phrase to require proof that the child actually perceived the act.

That rule comes from State v. Werner, 609 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 1992). Martin Werner of Broward County took his 13-month-old daughter into a locked bathroom for half an hour and later told his wife he had been masturbating while caring for the child. A jury convicted him, but the appeals court reversed because the State had not proved the baby was aware of the act. The Supreme Court agreed, holding that “the child must see or sense that a lewd or lascivious act is taking place for a violation to occur,” even if the child cannot understand or describe it.

For more than 30 years, Werner gave the defense a factual question to fight in every exhibition case: was the child asleep, facing away, or too far away to notice? Supporters of HB 1525 targeted exactly that. Representative Doug Bankson, the House sponsor, told CBS12 that the bill was partly prompted by an incident in his district and that the conduct can “scar a child for life.” Former Palm Beach County State Attorney Dave Aronberg told the station the conduct can escalate if it goes unpunished.

The new crime does not overrule Werner for section 800.04(7). A prosecutor charging the more serious second-degree felony still has to prove the child perceived the act. Section 800.035 is a separate, lower-level crime built for the cases Werner screened out.

How Did HB 1525 Change in the Legislature?

The bill changed shape twice before it passed, and it passed without a single “no” vote. Representative Doug Bankson sponsored the House bill with Representative Yarkosky. The Senate companion, SB 1742, was sponsored by Senator Jonathan Martin.

The first Senate committee substitute created a felony for lewd acts “while viewing” a child and repealed section 800.02. The second Senate substitute renamed the crime “indecent exposure of sexual organs while observing a child,” replaced “viewing” with the narrower defined term “observing,” and added the sentence that a child’s lack of awareness is no defense. The House Judiciary Committee adopted the same name and repealed section 800.02 in its version.

Vote tallies come from the official bill history and the Senate and House staff analyses. The Criminal Justice Impact Conference, the Legislature’s prison forecasting group, estimated a “positive indeterminate” effect on prison beds, meaning more prison admissions in a number it could not predict.

How Common Are These Charges in Florida?

Lewd exhibition charges are a small but steady part of Florida’s sex crime caseload. According to the Senate Fiscal Policy Committee’s analysis of SB 1742, which relied on Florida Department of Law Enforcement and Department of Corrections data compiled by the Office of Economic and Demographic Research, Florida recorded these numbers in fiscal year 2024-25:

The same analysis reports 34 new prison commitments for lewd exhibition offenses in that year, and a 9.7% incarceration rate for a Level 1 third-degree felony, the level the new crime is expected to score at. In plain terms, most people convicted of a Level 1 felony in Florida are not sent to state prison, but a felony conviction on a sex offense still follows them for life.

Does the New Crime Require Sex Offender Registration?

No. Section 800.035 is not on the list of registrable offenses in section 943.0435, Florida’s sexual offender registration statute. Section 800.04 is on that list, so a conviction for lewd or lascivious exhibition under section 800.04(7) requires lifetime registration, while a conviction under section 800.035 does not.

The new offense is also not on the list of crimes that trigger the mandatory sex offender probation conditions in section 948.30, such as curfews, residence restrictions, and no unsupervised contact with minors. A judge can still impose special conditions that relate to the offense, but they are not automatic.

In our view, that gap makes section 800.035 a significant new plea option. Before October 1, 2026, a defendant facing a lewd exhibition charge often had to choose between trial and a plea that carried registration. Now there is a felony that addresses the same conduct without registration. Whether prosecutors at the Hillsborough County State Attorney’s Office will offer it in a given case depends on the facts, but our attorneys will ask for it whenever the evidence of the child’s awareness is weak.

What Happened to Section 800.02?

HB 1525 repealed section 800.02, Florida’s “unnatural and lascivious act” law, effective October 1, 2026. That statute made it a second-degree misdemeanor, punishable by up to 60 days in jail, to commit an unnatural and lascivious act with another person. Florida courts treated it as a lesser included offense of lewd or lascivious charges under section 800.04, which meant a jury could return it as a compromise verdict.

In our experience, prosecutors almost never filed section 800.02 as a charge. Its real value was at trial. Because it was a lesser included offense with a name that sounds nearly as bad as lewd or lascivious, a jury looking for a compromise could choose it without knowing it was a non-sex misdemeanor with no registration requirement. For defense attorneys trying certain lewd or lascivious cases, it was a hidden gem, and its repeal takes that compromise verdict off the table for conduct on or after October 1, 2026.

The repeal removes that misdemeanor option for conduct on or after October 1, 2026. The Legislature’s fiscal analysts predicted the change could push more cases toward the more serious lewd or lascivious offenses. Charges for conduct before October 1, 2026 are not wiped out, because Article X, section 9 of the Florida Constitution provides that repealing a criminal statute does not affect prosecution or punishment for a crime already committed.

How Do You Fight an Indecent Exposure While Observing a Child Charge?

The State must prove intent, purpose, observation, and age beyond a reasonable doubt, and each element gives the defense room to work. Our Tampa sex crimes lawyer team focuses on these issues:

1. Purpose of sexual gratification. The State must prove the person was observing the child “for the purpose of his or her own sexual arousal or gratification.” Changing clothes, urinating, or being nude at home is not this crime without that purpose. Purpose is usually proved with circumstantial evidence, and circumstantial evidence can be challenged.
2. Observation. The person must have intentionally viewed the child under circumstances where the person was “reasonably capable of being seen” by the child. Distance, lighting, window tint, blinds, and sight lines matter. Our attorneys visit and photograph the scene.
3. Lewd or lascivious exposure. Nudity alone is not enough. The statute requires intentional exposure “in a lewd or lascivious manner,” and the State must prove both the intent and the lewd character of the exposure.
4. Age of the child. The child must be under 16. That element requires proof, usually through records or testimony.
5. Identity. Many of these cases begin with a neighbor’s report or a home security camera. Video quality, time stamps, and the reliability of an identification are all open to challenge.
6. Date of the conduct. Section 800.035 applies only to conduct on or after October 1, 2026. Earlier conduct must be charged under the laws in effect at the time.

These cases often start with an investigation before any arrest. If a detective has called you or a neighbor has made an accusation, representation before charges are filed gives our attorneys a chance to present context to the State Attorney’s Office before a filing decision.

Does Exposure Lead to Hands-On Offending?

Supporters of the law argued that non-contact offending can escalate, and research gives that argument partial support. In a long-term study published in the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law in 2006, Philip Firestone and colleagues followed 208 men assessed for exhibitionism at an Ottawa clinic for an average of 13 years. During follow-up, 23.6% were charged with or convicted of a new sexual offense, and 19 of the 49 men who reoffended sexually committed a hands-on offense.

The same study found that most men in the sample were not charged with a new sexual offense, and the strongest predictors of reoffending were measurable risk factors. That is why a professional psychosexual evaluation is often central to mitigation in these cases. Our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm use qualified evaluators to give prosecutors and judges an individual risk picture rather than a general assumption.

This post is part of our guide to the new Florida criminal laws that took effect October 1, 2026, which summarizes all eight laws in one place.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is it a crime in Florida if the child never saw anything?

Yes, under section 800.035, as long as the State proves the other elements, including that the person was observing the child for sexual gratification and could reasonably have been seen. The Brancato Law Firm focuses on the observation and purpose elements in these cases, because the child’s awareness is no longer a defense to this charge.

Do I have to register as a sex offender for a section 800.035 conviction?

No. Section 800.035 is not listed in section 943.0435, so a conviction does not trigger sexual offender registration, though other consequences of a felony conviction still apply. Our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm explain the full collateral picture before any plea, and our guide to sex offender registration in Florida covers which offenses do require it.

Can a lewd exhibition charge be reduced to the new offense?

It can, if the prosecutor agrees and the facts support it, because section 800.035 covers similar conduct at a lower degree and without registration. The Brancato Law Firm raises that option in negotiations when the evidence that the child perceived the act is weak, as described in our guide on how to fight a lewd and lascivious charge.

Is being naked in my own home illegal under the new law?

No, not by itself. The State must prove intentional lewd exposure or a sexual act while observing a child for sexual gratification, under circumstances where the child could reasonably see you. Our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm look closely at cases built on a single moment seen through a window, because context is often the whole defense.

What is the penalty for indecent exposure in front of an adult in Florida?

Exposure of sexual organs under section 800.03 is a first-degree misdemeanor for a first offense, punishable by up to one year in jail, and a third-degree felony for a second or later offense. The Brancato Law Firm defends exposure charges in Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties, and our sex crimes defense attorneys review whether the conduct was actually lewd.

What happens to pending section 800.02 cases?

They continue. The Florida Constitution provides that repealing a criminal statute does not affect prosecution for crimes already committed, so conduct before October 1, 2026 is still governed by the law in effect at the time. In a lewd or lascivious trial for conduct before that date, our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm will ask for the section 800.02 lesser included instruction, because it gives the jury a non-sex misdemeanor option.

Talk to a Tampa Sex Crimes Defense Lawyer Today

For more about our defense strategies, visit our Sex Crimes practice page.

What you say to a detective in the first days of an exposure investigation can become the State’s proof of purpose. Before you answer questions, call The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., founded by Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney Rocky Brancato, at (813) 727-7159. Our attorneys will review the allegation, the scene, and any video, and we will advise you on whether to speak at all. Call us at any hour; our office is two blocks from the courthouse. Our firm has Spanish-speaking staff, and attorney Jean-Luc Adrien speaks Spanish, Haitian Creole, and French. Read our guide for Spanish and Haitian Creole speakers facing criminal charges.

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A.
620 E. Twiggs Street, Suite 205, Tampa, FL 33602
(813) 727-7159
Serving Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. is a Tampa-based criminal defense practice. We are not affiliated with any other Brancato-named law firms.

I’m Rocky Brancato, founder of The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., a Tampa criminal defense firm. I am a former Major Crimes Unit attorney who handled homicide, sex crimes, and child abuse cases, and I later served as Chief Operations Officer of the Hillsborough County Public Defender’s Office, overseeing a staff of over 100 attorneys. Today our attorneys defend people facing sex offense charges through our Tampa sex crimes lawyer practice, and we defend people already on sex offender probation who are accused of a violation.

What are the standard sex offender probation conditions in Florida?

Section 948.30 lists the conditions a court must impose for covered sex offenses, and it says they “do not require oral pronouncement at the time of sentencing.” The covered offenses include sexual battery under chapter 794, lewd or lascivious offenses under section 800.04, child pornography under section 827.071, and several computer and trafficking offenses. The Florida Supreme Court confirmed in Levandoski v. State, 245 So. 3d 643 (Fla. 2018), that a judge does not have to announce each of these conditions for a defendant convicted of a listed offense.

The rules fall into groups based on the victim’s age and the date of the offense:

The full text is in section 948.30, Florida Statutes. Separate from these conditions, a court may order any registered sex offender on probation to complete an evaluation and any recommended treatment under section 948.31.

Which rules depend on the victim’s age or the date of the offense?

Many websites present every condition as universal, but several turn on two facts: the age of the victim and the date of the offense. The curfew, treatment, victim no-contact rule, internet restriction, and search condition apply to all covered offenses. The residence limit, the ban on contact with children, and the work restriction apply only when the victim was under 18.

The newest change took effect July 1, 2026. Chapter 2026-17, Laws of Florida, added public swimming pools to the places a probationer with a minor victim may not live near, work at, or visit without approval. Those probation conditions apply only to offenses committed on or after July 1, 2026. The same law also added public swimming pools to the 1,000-foot residency restriction in section 775.215, and that change reaches a person already under that restriction who moves on or after July 1, 2026, whatever the offense date.

Mandatory electronic monitoring also has its own triggers. Under section 948.30(3), GPS monitoring is required for offenses on or after September 1, 2005, when the victim was 15 or younger and the offender was 18 or older, when the probationer is a designated sexual predator, or when certain prior convictions exist. A probationer outside those groups can still be placed on monitoring at the Department of Corrections’ recommendation.

The scale is large. As of October 2024, the Florida Department of Corrections supervised 6,079 sex offenders living in Florida communities, and 67% of them were on active electronic monitoring, according to the Florida Legislature’s OPPAGA 2024 triennial review. The same report counted 1,999 registered sex offenders living in Hillsborough County, 1,579 in Pinellas County, and 872 in Pasco County. Those counts include everyone on the registry, not only people on probation.

Do you have to take a polygraph on sex offender probation, and can the results be used against you?

Yes, you have to take it, and no, the results cannot be used in court to prove a violation. Section 948.30(2)(a) requires polygraph exams “at least annually” as part of treatment, “to obtain information necessary for risk management and treatment and to reduce the sex offender’s denial mechanisms.” The results go to the probation officer and the treatment provider, and they “shall not be used as evidence in court to prove that a violation of community supervision has occurred.”

That rule matches Florida’s general approach. In Gosciminski v. State, 132 So. 3d 678 (Fla. 2013), the Florida Supreme Court reaffirmed that “[p]olygraph evidence is generally inadmissible in Florida.” In Griffin v. State, 958 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007), the court reversed a revocation because the trial judge admitted failed polygraph results and relied on them.

Research explains why the exam stays in the program anyway. The National Research Council’s report The Polygraph and Lie Detection (2003) found that polygraph testing can separate lies from truth “at rates well above chance, though well below perfection,” and that its usefulness in producing admissions comes from people’s beliefs about the test rather than its actual accuracy. A U.S. Department of Justice SMART Office research brief, Adult Sex Offender Management (2015), reported that polygraph use increases disclosures by offenders but found “no significant differences in sexual recidivism between polygraphed and nonpolygraphed sex offenders.”

In other words, the polygraph’s real power is the conversation it starts. That is exactly the conversation the next case addresses.

Can admissions made after a polygraph be used to violate your probation?

Yes. In Velazquez v. State, No. 1D2025-0550 (Fla. 1st DCA Oct. 7, 2026), the First District Court of Appeal held that statements a probationer makes when questioned about polygraph results can be used at a violation hearing, even though the results themselves cannot.

Antonio Velazquez pleaded guilty in 2022 to attempted sexual battery in Alachua County. He received 18 months in prison followed by two years of sex offender probation, with polygraphs and a treatment program. After a November 2024 polygraph, his probation officer received the results about a month later. Concerned by some of his answers, she handed him a legal pad, asked him questions, and had him write his answers. He admitted accessing the internet, using an unprescribed drug, giving alcohol to someone under 21, leaving the county twice, driving on a suspended license, and breaking curfew. His treatment provider also questioned him after reviewing the results and heard similar admissions.

The defense moved to dismiss, arguing that admissions drawn out by the polygraph results were barred by section 948.30(2)(a). The trial court denied the motion, found the violations, and extended his probation by 18 months with six months of electronic monitoring. It modified his probation rather than revoking it.

The First District affirmed. It held that the statute “only prohibits the ‘results of the polygraph examination’ being ‘used as evidence,’” and “places no evidentiary restriction upon a party’s admissions made separately from the actual polygraph results.” The court also said the statute “plainly allows a probation officer and a treatment provider to investigate based on the polygraph results.” As an independent ground, the court found that his failure to complete treatment supported the same result on its own.

Velazquez is a First District decision. Under Pardo v. State, 596 So. 2d 665 (Fla. 1992), trial courts in Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties must follow it unless the Second District rules otherwise, and we found no Second District decision on this question.

The practical lesson is that the interview after the polygraph is where a violation case is built. A probationer who walks into that interview without understanding these rules can talk himself into a violation the State could never prove with the polygraph alone.

Do you have to answer your probation officer’s questions?

You must answer questions about your compliance with probation, but you can decline to answer questions that would incriminate you in a separate crime. Florida courts describe this as a “qualified” privilege.

In Perry v. State, 778 So. 2d 1072 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001), the court explained that “[a] probationer may not refuse to answer a question, just because the answer would disclose a probation violation,” because accepting probation waives the privilege for that information. The court added that the privilege still “is applicable to conduct and circumstances concerning a separate criminal offense.” In Cassamassima, the court approved polygraph conditions so long as the results are not offered in evidence, and said a probationer may refuse to answer only where the Fifth Amendment protects him.

The U.S. Supreme Court set the outer boundary in Minnesota v. Murphy, 465 U.S. 420 (1984). If the State threatens to revoke probation to force answers that could incriminate the probationer in a separate prosecution, those answers “would be deemed compelled and inadmissible in a criminal prosecution.” The privilege is not automatic, though. In Murphy, the probationer never invoked it, so his admissions were used against him.

We have not found a Florida appellate decision on whether admissions made during a section 948.30 polygraph or its follow-up interview can be used in a new criminal prosecution. The Murphy framework governs that question. When polygraph questioning points toward a new, uncharged crime, the probationer is effectively under investigation, and our representation before charges are filed begins at that point.

Can a probation officer search your home, car, or phone without a warrant?

A probation officer can search your person, home, and vehicle without a warrant, but evidence from those searches has limits outside a violation hearing. Section 948.30(1)(k) requires “[s]ubmission to a warrantless search by the community control or probation officer of the probationer’s or community controllee’s person, residence, or vehicle.” Phones are not named in the statute.

In Phillips, a probation officer’s forensic download of a sex offender probationer’s phones was upheld for use in probation proceedings, and the court certified a question to the Florida Supreme Court. In Parker, a Manatee County stalking case, the Second District upheld an officer’s look through an unlocked phone where the victim’s report and GPS data supplied reasonable suspicion.

What happens if you are accused of violating sex offender probation in Hillsborough County?

You will usually stay in jail until a judge hears the case. Under the 13th Circuit’s 2026 bond schedule, Administrative Order S-2025-063, a person arrested on a felony while on probation, or a person designated a sexual offender or sexual predator, cannot be released before first appearance. A VOP warrant that is silent about bond means no bond until the person appears before the assigned judge. The 6th Circuit’s 2026 bond schedules for Pasco and Pinellas Counties treat the same categories the same way.

Under Administrative Order S-2024-062, a violation that does not involve a new felony goes to Circuit Criminal Division “K,” and a violation based on a new felony stays in the standard felony division. Bond requests go to the judge assigned to the violation. Our Hillsborough County criminal defense page explains how local procedure works, including bond on a probation violation.

At the hearing, the judge decides without a jury whether you willfully and substantially violated a condition. Under section 948.06, the judge can then revoke, modify, or continue probation. If probation is revoked, the judge can impose any sentence that could have been imposed originally. Our post on how to fight a probation violation in Florida explains the hearing rules, including why hearsay alone cannot support a revocation.

Which sex offender probation violations do courts reverse?

Appellate courts reverse when the State does not prove the condition was actually violated, when a probation officer invents a condition, or when the paperwork does not match what the judge ordered. The Second District, which covers Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties, has reversed several sex offender probation violations:

Reversal can also come at sentencing. In Smith v. State, No. 6D2023-3417 (Fla. 6th DCA July 31, 2026), the probationer admitted unsupervised contact with a minor, and the State dropped a second allegation of excessive drinking. Months later, the judge mistakenly treated both as admitted and imposed 20 years in prison. The Sixth District reversed for a new hearing limited to the admitted violation, holding that reliance on an unproven, unpursued violation is fundamental error. Our post on how to fight a probation violation in Florida covers this rule and the other limits on a VOP sentence.

Disputes over what the judge actually ordered come up when a defendant receives regular probation with some sex-offender-style conditions instead of sex offender probation. We covered one example in Florida Sex-Related Probation Conflict Explained, discussing Garcia v. State, 419 So. 3d 115 (Fla. 4th DCA 2025), where a written condition to “follow all sex offender rules” had to be struck because it conflicted with the oral sentence.

How does sex offender probation relate to sex offender registration?

They are separate obligations, and you must comply with both. Probation conditions come from the sentencing court and end when probation ends. Registration under section 943.0435 is a separate statutory duty that usually continues long after probation, and a failure to register is a separate third-degree felony in most cases.

A withhold of adjudication does not avoid either one. We explain the registration side in our guide to sex offender registration in Florida and the withhold issue in our post on withheld adjudication and sex offender registration.

What should you do in the first days after a probation violation arrest?

Call a lawyer before you answer any more questions. The violation case is usually built from what you say after a polygraph, a search, or a report, so the most important protection is getting advice before the next interview.

Our attorneys take these steps in the first days:

1. Get the violation affidavit and identify which condition is alleged and what evidence supports it.
2. Determine whether any allegation depends on polygraph results, which cannot prove a violation, or on admissions, which can.
3. Check whether the condition was actually imposed by the court or added by the officer or treatment provider.
4. Request a bond hearing before the judge assigned to the violation.
5. Advise you on whether to answer questions about any possible new charge.

For more about our defense strategies, visit our Sex Crimes page.

Frequently asked questions about Florida sex offender probation

Can I refuse a polygraph on sex offender probation in Florida?

Generally, no. Section 948.30(2)(a) makes annual polygraph exams a condition of sex offender probation for offenses on or after October 1, 1997, so refusing can itself be charged as a violation. The Brancato Law Firm reviews whether the condition actually applies to a client’s offense date and sentence before advising on any refusal.

Can a failed polygraph alone violate my probation in Florida?

No. The statute bars polygraph results from being used as evidence in court to prove a violation, and Griffin v. State reversed a revocation that relied on them. Our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm focus on what was said after the exam, because Velazquez allows those admissions to be used.

Can my probation officer search my phone on sex offender probation?

Possibly. Section 948.30(1)(k) authorizes warrantless searches of your person, home, and vehicle, and courts have decided phone searches case by case. The Brancato Law Firm challenges phone evidence when the officer lacked reasonable suspicion or when the State tries to use it in a new prosecution.

Do sex offender probation conditions apply if the judge never read them aloud?

Yes, for listed offenses. Section 948.30 and Levandoski v. State say these conditions do not have to be orally pronounced. When a client received regular probation instead, our team at The Brancato Law Firm compares the written order with the sentencing transcript to find conditions that were never lawfully imposed.

Can I see my own children while on sex offender probation in Florida?

It depends on the victim’s age. The ban on contact with minors applies only when the victim was under 18, and even then the court can approve supervised contact based on a qualified practitioner’s risk assessment. The Brancato Law Firm works with risk assessment professionals to support those requests, as we discuss in our post on risk assessments in sex offense cases.

Can a sex offender probation violation be dismissed?

Yes. A violation can be dismissed if the State cannot prove it with evidence other than hearsay and polygraph results, if the condition was never imposed by the court, or if the violation was not willful and substantial. Our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm test each allegation against those requirements before any hearing.

Do the new 2026 swimming pool rules apply to me?

The probation conditions apply only if your offense was committed on or after July 1, 2026, and the victim was under 18. Section 948.30(6) and (7) bar living within 1,000 feet of, working at, or visiting a public swimming pool without approval. Separately, if you are already under the residency restriction in section 775.215 and move on or after July 1, 2026, your new home must also be at least 1,000 feet from a public swimming pool, whatever your offense date. The Brancato Law Firm checks the offense date on every new case so clients are not held to rules that do not apply to them.

Talk to a Tampa criminal defense attorney about sex offender probation

If you are on sex offender probation and have been asked to sit for an interview, served with a violation affidavit, or arrested, the attorneys of The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., founded by Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney Rocky Brancato, can review the conditions and the evidence before you say anything more. Call (813) 727-7159. The next conversation with your probation officer can decide the case.

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A.
620 E. Twiggs Street, Suite 205, Tampa, FL 33602
(813) 727-7159
Serving Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. is a Tampa-based criminal defense practice. We are not affiliated with any other Brancato-named law firms.

In Gonzalez Garcia v. State (No. 4D2025-0471, Sept. 3, 2025), the Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed a written probation condition that conflicted with the oral pronouncement. As a result, the decision shows how a Florida probation conflict can unfairly expand conditions beyond what a judge actually ordered.

Case Background: Probation After Reduced Charges

The defendant faced charges of sexual battery and lewd or lascivious conduct. However, through a plea deal, those charges were reduced to aggravated child abuse and child abuse. He was sentenced to prison followed by probation.

The judge required him to:

• Complete a sex offender treatment program,
• Avoid victims and minors, and
• Follow specific conditions agreed to in court.

Importantly, the court did not impose full sex offender probation, which would have carried far stricter rules.

Florida Probation Conflict Between Written and Oral Sentence

After release, the probation officer attempted to enforce broad restrictions from the written sentencing order. Specifically, the order directed him to “follow all sex offender rules.”

Because of this, the appellate court found a Florida probation conflict. Florida law requires written orders to match oral pronouncements. Otherwise, a defendant faces restrictions that were never part of the official sentence.

Court’s Decision on the Probation Conflict

The Fourth DCA reversed and ordered the trial court to remove the “follow all sex offender rules” condition. The court emphasized:

• Probation must follow what is said in court.
• Written documents cannot expand restrictions.
• Defendants are protected from unlawful probation conflicts.

Why Florida Probation Conflicts Matter

When probation conditions go beyond the oral pronouncement, defendants face unnecessary risks:

• Harsher supervision,
• Greater chance of violation,
• Unfair restrictions not part of their plea.

An experienced attorney can spot and challenge these conflicts quickly.

For how probation fits into the rest of a case, see our guide to each stage of a Florida criminal case.

Protecting Your Future in Florida Courts

Probation conditions should never be harsher than what the judge actually ordered in court. When that happens, defendants and their families face unfair restrictions that were never part of the sentence. In these situations, you deserve immediate help from an attorney who knows how to challenge unlawful probation terms.

That is why at The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., attorney Rocky Brancato draws on more than 25 years of criminal defense experience, including years in an elite sex crimes unit, to protect clients and fight for fair outcomes.

Contact us today at (813) 727-7159 for a confidential consultation.