A Florida judge deciding whether a jury will hear about a defendant’s intoxication asks one question first: was it voluntary? I have watched that question decide cases for more than 25 years in Hillsborough County courtrooms, including during my time in the Major Crimes Unit defending homicide and other serious felony cases, and as the former Chief Operations Officer of the Hillsborough County Public Defender’s Office, where I oversaw a staff of over 100 attorneys. Today, as founder of The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., a Tampa criminal defense firm, I lead a team that examines medical records, prescriptions, and toxicology to find out whether an intoxication issue is a legal defense, a trial fact, or neither.

Is voluntary intoxication a defense in Florida?

No. Section 775.051, Florida Statutes, says that voluntary intoxication from alcohol or a controlled substance “is not a defense to any offense proscribed by law.” It also makes evidence of voluntary intoxication inadmissible to show that the defendant lacked specific intent or was insane at the time of the offense. The statute applies to offenses committed after July 1, 1999.

Before 1999, Florida allowed jurors to consider intoxication when a crime required specific intent, such as premeditated murder or burglary. That is why older articles and some websites still describe a “voluntary intoxication defense.” For offenses committed today, it does not exist.

Is section 775.051 constitutional?

Yes. Florida’s appellate courts have upheld it. In Cuc v. State, 834 So. 2d 378 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), Ellen Cuc argued that excluding her voluntary intoxication defense violated due process. The Fourth District affirmed her conviction, relying on Montana v. Egelhoff, 518 U.S. 37 (1996), where the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a Montana law that kept jurors from considering voluntary intoxication when deciding intent. The Fourth District wrote that Floridians “have decided to resurrect the rule that intoxication is not a defense to specific intent crimes.”

Florida was part of a national shift. Writing shortly after Egelhoff, Mitchell Keiter counted ten states with these “full responsibility” laws in Just Say No Excuse: The Rise and Fall of the Intoxication Defense, 87 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 482 (1997). Florida joined that group two years later.

When does intoxication count as involuntary in Florida?

Intoxication is involuntary when it results unexpectedly from medication that was lawfully prescribed and taken as prescribed. Section 775.051 carves out use of a controlled substance “pursuant to a lawful prescription issued to the defendant by a practitioner as defined in s. 893.02.” In Montero v. State, 996 So. 2d 888 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008), the Fourth District called that exception “essentially a codification” of the involuntary intoxication defense, which applies “where the defendant unexpectedly becomes intoxicated by prescribed medication that is taken in a lawful manner.”

The leading example is Brancaccio v. State, 698 So. 2d 597 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). A 16-year-old taking prescribed Zoloft was convicted of first-degree murder and kidnapping. Experts, hospital records, and people who knew him described a sudden personality change consistent with an adverse reaction to the drug. The trial judge refused an involuntary intoxication instruction and gave only the standard insanity instruction. The Fourth District reversed for a new trial, holding that the jury would not have known that involuntary intoxication by medication could be a defense.

What are the limits of the prescription exception?

The exception does not protect misuse. Montero held that the exception “does not apply where the defendant abuses the prescribed medication by exceeding the prescribed dosage.” In that case, Montero claimed his lawyer should have raised involuntary intoxication from hydrocodone and alprazolam. The court rejected the claim because he never alleged he took the prescribed doses or that the intoxication was unexpected, and it noted that both drugs have well-known intoxicating effects.

In practice, the defense rises or falls on records. Our attorneys gather the prescription history, pharmacy fill dates, pill counts, the prescriber’s notes, and any blood or urine testing, then work with forensic toxicologists and psychiatrists to explain the reaction. Our Tampa criminal mental health lawyer page describes how we handle cases where medication, mental illness, and criminal charges overlap.

How common is intoxication in criminal cases?

Very common, which is why the voluntary intoxication bar affects so many cases. In the 2016 Survey of Prison Inmates, the Bureau of Justice Statistics found that 31% of state prisoners reported drinking alcohol at the time of their offense and 39% reported using drugs at the time of the offense, according to its report Alcohol and Drug Use and Treatment Reported by Prisoners (July 2021). Among state prisoners serving time for a violent offense, 34% reported drinking at the time of the offense.

Those numbers explain why prosecutors routinely ask judges to keep intoxication evidence away from jurors, and why an involuntary intoxication claim draws close scrutiny. A defense built on a prescription has to show it is different from the ordinary case.

Can intoxication still matter at trial if it is not a defense?

Sometimes, for purposes other than negating intent. Section 775.051 bars voluntary intoxication evidence offered to show lack of specific intent or insanity. Evidence about drinking or drug use can still come up for other reasons, such as a witness’s ability to perceive and remember events, or the reliability of a statement the accused gave to police while impaired. Whether it comes in depends on the purpose, and judges decide that issue case by case.

How does intoxication relate to the insanity defense?

Voluntary intoxication cannot be used to prove insanity. Insanity is a separate affirmative defense under section 775.027, Florida Statutes, which requires a mental infirmity, disease, or defect that kept the defendant from knowing what he was doing or that it was wrong. The defendant must prove insanity by clear and convincing evidence. Brancaccio shows why the two defenses must be kept separate: an insanity instruction alone did not tell the jury that a reaction to prescribed medication could excuse the conduct.

Does intoxication help at sentencing?

Usually not. Under section 921.0026(3), Florida Statutes, a defendant’s substance abuse or addiction, “including intoxication at the time of the offense,” is not a mitigating factor and “does not, under any circumstances, justify a downward departure.” The one exception is for a nonviolent felony with a scoresheet total of 60 points or fewer, when the court finds the defendant is amenable to a postadjudicatory treatment-based drug court program. Our attorneys build mitigation around treatment, mental health, and other recognized grounds rather than intoxication itself.

That last row matters. In a DUI case, impairment is what the State must prove, so a valid prescription is not a defense to driving while impaired; our post on DUI for prescription drugs in Florida explains that charge.

Frequently asked questions

Can I use being drunk as a defense to burglary or theft in Florida?

No. Voluntary intoxication cannot be used to argue you lacked the intent to commit burglary, theft, or any other crime committed after July 1, 1999. The Brancato Law Firm looks instead at the State’s evidence of intent, entry, and identity, which are often contestable without any intoxication argument.

What if my prescription medication made me act out of character?

That may support an involuntary intoxication defense if you took the medication as prescribed and the reaction was unexpected. The Brancato Law Firm gathers prescription and pharmacy records and consults medical experts, following the approach the court approved in Brancaccio v. State; our criminal mental health defense team handles these cases.

Is it involuntary intoxication if someone drugged my drink?

Florida’s statute bars only voluntary intoxication, so intoxication you did not choose is not covered by that bar. The Brancato Law Firm investigates these claims with toxicology testing and witness evidence, because the claim has to be proven with facts, not just asserted.

Does the prescription exception apply if I took extra pills?

No. Florida courts hold that the exception does not apply when a defendant exceeds the prescribed dosage, as Montero v. State explains. Our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm review pill counts and fill dates early so we know whether the defense is available before we raise it.

Can intoxication reduce a murder charge in Florida?

Voluntary intoxication cannot be used to argue that a killing was not premeditated. The Brancato Law Firm defends homicide cases on the evidence of premeditation itself, and on involuntary intoxication when prescription records support it, as described on our Tampa homicide attorney page.

Does being intoxicated affect whether my confession can be used?

It can. Impairment is one factor courts consider in deciding whether a statement was voluntary and reliable. The Brancato Law Firm reviews interrogation recordings for signs of impairment and challenges statements taken from people who could not understand their rights.

For how The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. defends these cases, see our Tampa DUI defense practice.

Talk to our attorneys before the State frames the evidence

Prosecutors move early to keep intoxication evidence out, so the medical records need to be gathered before the first pretrial motions. Our attorneys will review your prescriptions and the State’s evidence and tell you whether an involuntary intoxication defense is available. Call The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., founded by Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney Rocky Brancato, at (813) 727-7159; call us at any hour. Our office is two blocks from the courthouse. Our firm has Spanish-speaking staff, and attorney Jean-Luc Adrien speaks Spanish, Haitian Creole, and French. Read our guide for criminal defense in Spanish and Haitian Creole in Tampa. For more about our defense strategies, visit our Criminal Mental Health page.

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A.
620 E. Twiggs Street, Suite 205, Tampa, FL 33602
(813) 727-7159
Serving Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. is a Tampa-based criminal defense practice. We are not affiliated with any other Brancato-named law firms.

Most adult sexual battery trials are not about whether sex happened. They are about whether it was consensual, and the jury decides that from texts, timelines, witnesses, and the two people’s accounts. I learned how those trials are won in the Major Crimes Unit, defending sex crimes and homicide cases, and I have tried more than 150 jury trials to verdict since. I’m Rocky Brancato, founder of The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., a Tampa criminal defense firm, and our attorneys build consent defenses the way juries actually evaluate them: from the evidence of what happened before, during, and after the encounter.

Is consent a defense to sexual battery in Florida?

Yes, for adults. Under section 794.011, Florida Statutes, sexual battery on a person 18 or older requires proof that the act was “without that person’s consent.” When the defense is consent, the State carries the burden of proving lack of consent beyond a reasonable doubt; the accused does not have to prove consent. Our Tampa sex crimes lawyer team builds that reasonable doubt from the evidence.

The statute defines consent as “intelligent, knowing, and voluntary consent” that “does not include coerced submission,” and it adds that consent shall not be construed to mean “the failure by the alleged victim to offer physical resistance.” In plain English: silence or no struggle is not proof of consent, but it is not proof of non-consent either. The jury looks at the whole picture.

Is believing the other person consented a defense in Florida?

No, not by itself. In Statler v. State, 349 So. 3d 873 (Fla. 2022), an Alachua County man convicted of sexual battery argued the State should have to prove he knew or should have known the woman did not consent. The Florida Supreme Court disagreed. It held that sexual battery is a general intent crime: the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the complainant did not in fact consent, but not what the accused knew about her state of mind.

The same opinion explains why consent defenses still work. The Court said consent is an objective question decided from “what the complainant said and did,” so the jury asks whether the evidence proves the accused “did not have a willing partner.” That is where our attorneys focus: on the words, messages, and conduct a reasonable person would read as agreement.

When is consent not a defense?

Consent is legally impossible or irrelevant in several situations, and a consent defense will not work in them.

For age-based charges, see our posts on the age of consent in Florida and on why not knowing someone’s age is not a defense. The degrees and penalties for each form of the offense are set out in our guide to what sexual battery is in Florida.

What happens when alcohol is involved?

Alcohol is present in a large share of these cases. Antonia Abbey’s review in the Journal of Studies on Alcohol (Supplement No. 14, 2002) found that at least half of sexual assaults among college students involve alcohol consumption by the perpetrator, the alleged victim, or both. Drinking does not by itself erase consent under Florida law, but heavy intoxication is often the center of the State’s case.

Florida’s statute treats voluntary and involuntary intoxication differently. In Amelio v. State, 253 So. 3d 1150 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018), a Broward County jury heard an instruction on “mental incapacity” even though the woman had voluntarily drunk at several bars and nothing showed a substance was given to her without her consent. The Fourth District reversed the conviction and ordered a new trial, holding that the statutory definition of mental incapacity covers involuntary intoxication, not voluntary drinking.

Heavy voluntary intoxication can still support a conviction on other grounds. In Fogarty v. State, 403 So. 3d 1026 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024), a Bay County case, neither the defendant nor the woman remembered sex, but the defendant admitted carrying her to a couch after she passed out, and DNA was found later. The First District held a jury could infer she was too drunk to give “intelligent, knowing, and voluntary consent” and was unconscious, and it affirmed. Together the two cases show where the fight is: the defense contests whether the State has proof of incapacity or helplessness at the moment of the act, not just proof of drinking.

How often are these cases reported and prosecuted?

The Bureau of Justice Statistics report Criminal Victimization, 2023 estimated 481,020 rape or sexual assault victimizations nationwide in 2023 and found that 46.0% were reported to police. Locally, the Florida Legislature’s Office of Economic and Demographic Research Circuit 13 profile reports 155 new prison commitments for sexual or lewd behavior from the 13th Judicial Circuit in 2025. Our attorneys treat every sexual battery accusation as a case that can end in prison and lifetime registration, because many do.

What evidence supports a consent defense?

A consent defense is built from evidence, not from the accused’s word alone. These are the sources our attorneys collect first:

• Messages before and after the encounter. Texts, dating-app chats, and social media messages often show planning, mutual interest, or a friendly tone afterward.
• Timeline evidence. Ride-share receipts, door cameras, bar tabs, and phone location data show how much time passed and how each person was acting.
• Witnesses. Friends, bartenders, and roommates can describe the alleged victim’s condition and conduct, which bears on capacity.
• Forensic findings. A SANE exam that shows no injury does not prove consent, but it can rebut a claim of force.
• Motive and prior statements. Changed accounts and reasons to fabricate are proper subjects of cross-examination, within the limits of Florida’s rape shield law.

Consent defenses do win at trial. In one sexual battery case, Rocky Brancato persuaded a jury that an encounter between a man and a woman in a van in Ybor City was consensual; the defense showed the two were interrupted and that the woman was embarrassed, and the jury returned a verdict of not guilty of sexual battery. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

What should you do if you are accused?

Do not contact the accuser and do not agree to a recorded “controlled call,” which detectives often arrange through the accuser before an arrest. Do not delete messages; deleted messages look like consciousness of guilt and they are often the best consent evidence. Call a lawyer who offers representation before charges are filed, because many sexual battery cases are investigated for weeks before a warrant issues.

Frequently asked questions

Can you consent to sex while drunk in Florida?

Yes, a person who has been drinking can still consent, because Florida’s definition of mental incapacity covers substances given without the person’s consent, as the court held in Amelio v. State. The Brancato Law Firm focuses these cases on whether the State can prove the person was helpless or unable to give intelligent, knowing, and voluntary consent at the time.

Is an honest belief in consent a defense to sexual battery in Florida?

No. Under Statler v. State, the State does not have to prove the accused knew there was no consent, so a belief alone is not a defense. The Brancato Law Firm instead puts the complainant’s own words and conduct in front of the jury, because that evidence decides whether the State has proved lack of consent.

Is a lack of resistance proof of consent in Florida?

No. Section 794.011(1)(a) states that consent shall not be construed to mean the alleged victim’s failure to physically resist. Our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm build consent defenses from affirmative evidence such as messages, conduct, and timeline records rather than from the absence of a struggle.

Can a sexual battery charge be dropped if the accuser recants in Florida?

A recantation does not automatically end the case, because the State Attorney’s Office decides whether to prosecute and can proceed with other evidence. The Brancato Law Firm presents recantations and supporting evidence to prosecutors through pre-file advocacy or a motion to dismiss when the facts support it.

Can my past relationship with the accuser be used to show consent?

Sometimes. Florida’s rape shield law generally bars evidence of the accuser’s sexual history, but it allows evidence of prior consensual activity with the accused when it is relevant to consent. The Brancato Law Firm litigates that evidence before trial so the jury can hear it; our sex crimes defense practice handles these motions regularly.

Is consent a defense if the other person was 16 or 17?

No, if the accused was 24 or older, because section 794.05 does not require proof of non-consent. Our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm explain the age bands in our post on unlawful sexual activity with a minor.

Talk to a Tampa sexual battery defense attorney

Messages get deleted, cameras overwrite footage, and witnesses forget within weeks, so the first move is to lock down the evidence of consent. Call The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., founded by Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney Rocky Brancato, at (813) 727-7159, and call us at any hour if a detective has contacted you. Our firm has Spanish-speaking staff, and attorney Jean-Luc Adrien speaks Spanish, Haitian Creole, and French. Read our guide for Spanish and Haitian Creole speakers facing criminal charges. For more about our defense strategies, visit our Sex Crimes page.

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A.
620 E. Twiggs Street, Suite 205, Tampa, FL 33602
(813) 727-7159
Serving Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. is a Tampa-based criminal defense practice. We are not affiliated with any other Brancato-named law firms.

If you were arrested for DUI after taking a medication exactly as your doctor prescribed, the first thing to know is that the State has a harder case to prove than it does with alcohol. I am Rocky Brancato, founder of The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., a Tampa criminal defense firm; I am a member of the National College for DUI Defense and a former police academy instructor who trained officers, and I have spent more than 25 years in Hillsborough County courtrooms. In prescription drug DUI cases, our attorneys start with the toxicology report, the prescription records, and the officer’s video, because the gap between a drug being present and a driver being impaired is where these cases are won.

Can you get a DUI for prescription drugs in Florida?

Yes. Section 316.193(1)(a), Florida Statutes, makes it a crime to drive or be in actual physical control of a vehicle while “under the influence of alcoholic beverages, any chemical substance set forth in s. 877.111, or any substance controlled under chapter 893, when affected to the extent that the person’s normal faculties are impaired.” The statute does not exempt drugs taken with a prescription. The penalties for a prescription drug DUI are the same as for an alcohol DUI, which our guide to Florida DUI penalties lays out.

Which prescription drugs can lead to a DUI charge in Florida?

The drugs that most often lead to DUI arrests are the sedating and stimulant medications listed on Florida’s controlled substance schedules in section 893.03, Florida Statutes. The table shows common examples and where each appears.

Some widely prescribed medications that can cause drowsiness, including gabapentin, the muscle relaxer cyclobenzaprine, the antihistamine diphenhydramine, and the antidepressant amitriptyline, do not appear in section 893.03. When the toxicology report shows only a drug of that kind, our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm question whether the substance fits the statute at all before the case reaches a jury.

Is a valid prescription a defense to DUI in Florida?

A prescription alone is not a defense. If the State proves the medication impaired your normal faculties, the fact that a doctor prescribed it does not change the verdict. A prescription still matters to the defense in three ways: it explains why the drug was in your system, it shows the dose you were supposed to take, and it can support the argument that a therapeutic dose did not impair you.

Florida law also recognizes involuntary intoxication in DUI cases. In Carter v. State, 710 So. 2d 110 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), a driver testified he took four tablets a friend handed him as ibuprofen; the friend testified she kept her prescribed amitriptyline in the same container and realized the next day she had given him the wrong pills. The trial court refused to instruct the jury on involuntary intoxication. The Fourth District reversed his conviction and ordered a new trial, holding that when there is evidence a driver unknowingly ingested a substance that impaired him and drove without knowing he was or would become impaired, the jury must be instructed on involuntary intoxication. The lesson today: a mistaken pill, a pharmacy error, or an unexpected drug reaction can raise a real defense, but only if the evidence is gathered and presented.

How do police investigate a prescription drug DUI in Florida?

Police build a drug DUI case from driving behavior, field sobriety exercises, statements about medication, and a urine or blood test. When drugs are suspected, the arresting officer may call a drug recognition expert, an officer trained in a 12-step evaluation protocol. Our post on drug recognition experts in Florida explains that protocol in detail.

Florida courts allow drug recognition testimony, but it does not settle the case. In Williams v. State, 710 So. 2d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), a driver blew 0.07 at a checkpoint, two officers trained as drug recognition experts concluded he was under the influence of alcohol, a stimulant, and cannabis, and his urine tested positive for cocaine and marijuana metabolite. The Third District held that the drug recognition evidence was admissible, but stressed that “the State is still required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is impaired by a chemical or controlled substances.” The weight of that testimony is for the jury, and our attorneys cross-examine the evaluator on every step of the protocol.

Testing also has limits. A urine test can show a drug or its metabolite was present, but not how much was affecting the driver at the time of driving. A blood test generally requires a warrant or valid consent, because the U.S. Supreme Court held in Birchfield v. North Dakota, 579 U.S. 438 (2016), that police may require a breath test without a warrant after a DUI arrest but not a blood test. Breath tests detect alcohol, not drugs.

How often are drugs involved in Florida crashes?

Florida recorded 553 drug-confirmed crashes and 325 drug-confirmed traffic deaths in 2023, according to the Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles’ Impaired Driving Annual Report (January 2025). Prescription-type drugs show up in national data as well. In a 2022 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration study of 7,279 seriously or fatally injured road users at seven Level 1 trauma centers, including one in Jacksonville, 9.3% tested positive for opioids, 10.8% for stimulants, and 7.5% for sedatives, according to Alcohol and Drug Prevalence Among Seriously or Fatally Injured Road Users (DOT HS 813 400).

Those numbers measure presence, not impairment. A person who takes a daily prescription can test positive for weeks, which is why our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm treat a positive result as the starting point of the analysis.

Why is a drug DUI harder for the State to prove than an alcohol DUI?

A drug DUI is harder to prove because Florida has no per se drug limit. For alcohol, a 0.08 result is itself a crime and is prima facie evidence of impairment under section 316.1934. No statute sets a comparable number for oxycodone, alprazolam, or zolpidem, so the State must connect the drug to the driver’s impairment with other evidence.

Florida legal writers identified the problem decades ago. In a 1998 Florida Bar Journal article, “The Drugged Driver and the Need for a Per Se Law” (Vol. 72, No. 7), Betty J. Buchan and Mark F. Lewis explained that urine results show whether a drug was present but not how much, and that drug recognition testimony needs other evidence of impairment behind it. The Legislature has not adopted a per se drug limit, so those weaknesses remain in the State’s case today.

How do our attorneys fight a prescription drug DUI in Florida?

Our attorneys fight a prescription drug DUI by separating presence from impairment at every step. This is the framework we use:

1. Challenge the stop and the arrest. If the officer lacked a lawful reason to stop the car or probable cause to arrest, a motion to suppress can remove the test results and the observations.
2. Identify the exact substance. We confirm what the lab found and whether that drug is a controlled substance under chapter 893 or a chemical listed in section 877.111.
3. Get the prescription and dosing records. A therapeutic dose taken as directed is strong evidence that the driver was functioning normally.
4. Attack the timing. Urine results and many blood results cannot show when a drug was taken or whether it was active while the person was driving.
5. Cross-examine the drug recognition evaluation. We check each step of the protocol against the video and the evaluator’s training records.
6. Explain the clues another way. Fatigue, diabetes, inner-ear problems, injuries, and anxiety can produce the same signs officers attribute to drugs.
7. Raise involuntary intoxication when the facts support it. A pharmacy error, a mislabeled container, or an unexpected interaction can support the instruction approved in Carter.

Prescription drug DUI cases often turn on toxicology, and our forensic science defense work includes consulting independent toxicologists. In Hillsborough County, the State Attorney’s RIDR diversion program has a separate track for drug-related DUI, with 50 community service hours and 3 months of a drug-detection sweat patch in place of an ignition interlock, and our attorneys screen every first-time client for it. Our Hillsborough County criminal defense page explains how these cases move through county court. Our Tampa DUI defense attorney page describes the rest of our DUI work.

What results has our firm obtained in drug DUI cases?

Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

Frequently asked questions about prescription drug DUI in Florida

Can you get a DUI for taking Xanax as prescribed in Florida?

Yes, if the State proves the alprazolam impaired your normal faculties while you were driving. The Brancato Law Firm uses the prescription, the dose, and the timing to show the jury that a therapeutic dose did not impair your driving.

Is there a legal limit for prescription drugs while driving in Florida?

No. Florida has a 0.08 limit for alcohol but no numeric limit for any prescription drug, so the State must prove actual impairment. Our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm press that point in every drug DUI case, because without a per se number the officer’s observations carry the State’s case.

Can a prescription drug DUI be dropped in Florida?

Yes. Drug DUI charges can be dropped or reduced when the stop was unlawful, the lab cannot tie the drug to impairment, or the substance does not fit the statute. The Brancato Law Firm pursues those arguments before trial and negotiates reductions to reckless driving when the evidence supports it, as described on our DUI lawyer in Tampa page.

Does a positive urine test prove I was impaired by my medication?

No. A urine test shows that a drug or its metabolite was present, not how much was active when you were driving. The Brancato Law Firm works with independent toxicologists to explain that limit to prosecutors and juries.

Should I tell the officer what medications I take?

You have the right to remain silent, and statements about medication are often the State’s best evidence of what drug was involved. Our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm advise clients to give identification and documents the law requires and to decline other questions until they have spoken with a lawyer, as our guide on what happens after a DUI arrest explains.

Can a prescription drug DUI affect my commercial driver’s license?

Yes. A DUI conviction for a controlled substance disqualifies a CDL holder from commercial driving for at least one year, even if it happened in a personal car. The Brancato Law Firm explains the rules in our guide on what happens to a CDL after a DUI in Florida.

For how The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. defends these cases, see our Tampa drug crimes defense practice.

Talk to our attorneys about a prescription drug DUI

The toxicology report, the video, and your prescription records are the core of a drug DUI defense, and the 10-day license deadline started at your arrest. Call The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., founded by Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney Rocky Brancato, at (813) 727-7159, and our attorneys will request your license review and begin gathering those records. You can call us at any hour. Our firm has Spanish-speaking staff, and attorney Jean-Luc Adrien speaks Spanish, Haitian Creole, and French. For more about our defense strategies, visit our DUI defense page.

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A.
620 E. Twiggs Street, Suite 205, Tampa, FL 33602
(813) 727-7159
Serving Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. is a Tampa-based criminal defense practice. We are not affiliated with any other Brancato-named law firms.