If detectives took a phone or laptop from your home, the number of files on it will drive the sentencing exposure more than almost any other fact. I learned how these cases are built in the Major Crimes Unit, and as founder of The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., a Tampa criminal defense firm, I have tried more than 150 jury trials to verdict. Our attorneys attack the count, the reclassification, and the scoresheet before any plea offer is discussed, because each of those numbers can move.

What are Florida’s child pornography penalties after July 1, 2026?

Florida’s child pornography penalties rose on July 1, 2026. CS/CS/HB 1159, signed March 31, 2026 as Chapter 2026-20, Laws of Florida, renamed “child pornography” as “child sexual abuse material” (CSAM) throughout the statutes and made these changes, according to the House Criminal Justice Subcommittee analysis:

The age change matters most. Because the content trigger rose from a child under 5 to a child under 12, far more collections now meet the reclassification test. The law in effect on the date of the offense generally controls the sentence, so the date files were downloaded or viewed can decide which version of the statute applies. Our attorneys examine the forensic timeline for that reason.

How does Florida count child pornography charges?

Florida counts each image as a separate crime. Section 827.071(5) states that possessing, controlling, or intentionally viewing each photograph, video, image, or data file is a separate offense, and if one image shows more than one child, each child in that image is a separate offense. A single device can produce dozens or hundreds of felony counts. Our Tampa internet crimes attorney page explains how these investigations usually begin.

The Second District Court of Appeal, whose decisions bind Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco courts, showed how far this goes in Walsh v. State, 198 So. 3d 783 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016). Officers found more than 3,000 images on a Sarasota County man’s home computer. The State selected 170 images, sorted them into groups of ten with each group containing an image of sexual battery on a child, and charged one reclassified count per group. He entered an open plea to 17 second-degree counts and received a total of 63.5 years in prison.

On appeal, Walsh argued that all the images from one episode should be one offense. The court disagreed. Because the statute makes each image a separate offense, the State could have charged all 170 images as separate counts, and section 775.0847 does not limit the State’s charging discretion. The lesson is that the prosecutor, not the device, decides how many counts appear on the information. That is why early defense work on the charging decision matters.

What triggers the section 775.0847 enhancement?

Section 775.0847 reclassifies a child pornography offense one degree higher when two conditions are both met. The enhancement applies to violations of sections 827.071, 847.0135, 847.0137, and 847.0138.

Reclassification is a fact the State must prove. In Jenrette-Smith v. State, 114 So. 3d 427 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013), a man who identified himself only as “James” handed an envelope of photographs to a Tampa police officer, which led to charges against the defendant on 14 counts of promoting a sexual performance by a child, one per photograph. The jury found he possessed 10 or more images, at least one depicting sexual battery, and all 14 counts were reclassified to first-degree felonies. The majority affirmed, relying on evidence that he possessed the camera, the film, and the developed prints. A dissenting judge argued that the enhancement depends on possessing 10 images when each offense is committed, so no more than four of the counts could be reclassified.

The dissent did not carry the day, but the question it raised remains a live defense issue: when each file arrived on the device, and whether the State can prove possession of 10 images at that time. Our attorneys work with independent forensic examiners on file dates, download paths, and whether files were ever opened.

How is a child pornography case scored on the Florida scoresheet?

Florida sentences felonies with a Criminal Punishment Code scoresheet. Under the 2026 offense severity chart in section 921.0022, possession under section 827.071(5) is a Level 6 offense and possession with intent to promote under section 827.071(4) is Level 7. A reclassified offense moves up one level. Under section 921.0024, the primary offense earns 36 points at Level 6 and 56 at Level 7, and each additional count earns 18 points at Level 6 and 28 at Level 7. When the total exceeds 44 points, the lowest permissible prison sentence in months is the total minus 28, multiplied by 0.75.

Here is how that math plays out for a person with no prior record and no other points. These examples are simplified; real scoresheets include prior record, legal status, and other factors.

The gap between those rows is the reclassification fight. Every count the defense removes, and every count that is not reclassified, lowers the floor. A judge can sentence anywhere from the lowest permissible sentence up to the statutory maximum for every count, served concurrently or consecutively.

How often do Florida possession cases end in prison?

Most Florida possession convictions end in prison. In fiscal year 2024-25, Florida Department of Corrections data showed 316 new prison commitments and 134 supervision sentences for knowingly soliciting, possessing, controlling, or intentionally viewing child pornography, according to the Florida Legislature’s Office of Economic and Demographic Research Criminal Justice Impact Conference review of SB 1750 (2026). The same review reported 654 new prison commitments in FY 2024-25 under statutes potentially subject to section 775.0847 reclassification.

The review also shows why the July 2026 change matters. It reported a 26 percent incarceration rate for Level 6 third-degree felonies and 39.7 percent for Level 6 second-degree felonies. Possession moved from the first group to the second.

Can a child pornography sentence go below the scoresheet?

Yes. A Florida judge may impose a downward departure below the lowest permissible sentence when the defense proves a legal reason under section 921.0026. Two reasons come up often in these cases: the defendant requires specialized treatment for a mental disorder unrelated to substance abuse and is amenable to treatment, and the offense was committed in an unsophisticated manner, was an isolated incident, and the defendant has shown remorse. Substance abuse or intoxication alone is not a valid reason.

Departure arguments rest on evidence about risk. A U.S. Department of Justice SMART Office research brief, Internet-Facilitated Sexual Offending (2015), summarizes a review by Michael Seto and colleagues of nine samples totaling 2,630 internet offenders followed for slightly more than three years: 4.6 percent committed a new sexual offense, 2 percent a contact sexual offense, and 3.4 percent a new child pornography offense. Our attorneys pair research like this with a psychosexual evaluation from a qualified expert, treatment records, and family testimony.

Mandatory minimums have a narrow exception. Under section 827.071(7), a court is not required to impose a mandatory minimum under that section if it finds in writing that the depicted child was 14 or older, the image was created with the child’s permission, the offender was not more than 4 years older, and the offender did not share it with anyone else. This exception fits teen sexting cases.

What other consequences follow a conviction?

A conviction for possessing or promoting child sexual abuse material in Florida requires registration as a sexual offender, which carries reporting duties, residence limits, and public listing. Many cases also bring sex offender probation conditions, limits on internet use, and immigration consequences for noncitizens. Our post on whether a withhold of adjudication avoids the sex offender registry explains why a withhold does not solve the registration problem.

For a full look at defenses, including search warrant challenges like the one in our post on Florida’s 10-day search warrant rule, see our guide to defending CSAM charges in Florida.

What should you do if you are under investigation?

Call a lawyer before you talk to detectives or consent to a device search. Many cases begin with a tip to law enforcement and a search warrant, and the charging decision, including how many images to file and whether to seek reclassification, is made after the forensic report. That window is when our pre-file advocacy can affect the number of counts.

1. Do not discuss the case with officers, family, or coworkers.
2. Do not delete files or reset devices. Destroying evidence is a separate crime.
3. Do not consent to searches of other devices or accounts.
4. Write down when officers arrived, what they took, and what they said.
5. Contact a defense attorney the same day.

Frequently asked questions about child pornography penalties in Florida

Is possession of child pornography a felony in Florida in 2026?

Yes. For offenses on or after July 1, 2026, each image is a separate second-degree felony punishable by up to 15 years in prison under section 827.071(5). The Brancato Law Firm reviews the offense dates in the forensic report to determine whether the older third-degree version applies.

Is there a mandatory minimum sentence for possessing child pornography in Florida?

Section 827.071(5) does not set a mandatory minimum for simple possession, but with 10 counts and no prior record the scoresheet floor is about 10.6 years in prison. Our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm calculate the scoresheet at the start of the case so clients understand the real floor and the departure options.

Can prosecutors charge every image as a separate count?

Yes. Florida law makes each image, and each child in each image, a separate offense, and the Second District held in Walsh that reclassification does not limit how many counts the State may file. The Brancato Law Firm challenges duplicate files, unopened files, and images that do not meet the legal definition before the information is filed or amended.

Does the July 2026 law apply to a case from before July 1, 2026?

The law in effect on the date of the offense generally controls the penalty, so files possessed only before July 1, 2026 are usually scored under the older third-degree statute. Our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm press the State to prove when each file was possessed, since that date can cut the maximum by two-thirds.

What is the difference between possession and possession with intent to promote?

Possession with intent to promote under section 827.071(4) is a second-degree Level 7 offense, and possessing three or more copies of an image is prima facie evidence of intent to promote. The Brancato Law Firm contests the intent element when file copies come from automatic backups or sync software rather than sharing; learn more on our internet crimes defense page.

Can a child pornography sentence be reduced below the scoresheet in Florida?

Yes, through a downward departure when the defense proves a statutory reason such as treatable mental health needs or an isolated, unsophisticated offense with remorse. The Brancato Law Firm builds departure motions with expert evaluations and treatment plans rather than character letters alone.

For more about our defense strategies, visit our Internet Crimes page.

For how The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. defends these cases, see our Tampa sex crimes defense practice.

Get a scoresheet review before the State files

The charging decision in a CSAM case often follows the forensic review of the seized devices, and that window closes fast. Our attorneys will review the warrant, the device seizure, and your likely scoresheet, so call The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., founded by Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney Rocky Brancato, at (813) 727-7159. We are two blocks from the courthouse, and you can call us at any hour. Our firm has Spanish-speaking staff, and attorney Jean-Luc Adrien speaks Spanish, Haitian Creole, and French. Read our guide for Spanish and Haitian Creole speakers facing criminal charges.

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A.
620 E. Twiggs Street, Suite 205, Tampa, FL 33602
(813) 727-7159
Serving Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. is a Tampa-based criminal defense practice. We are not affiliated with any other Brancato-named law firms.

A Florida judge can sentence below the scoresheet only when the defense proves a legal reason for it with evidence, and most of that evidence lives in the client’s own life story. I have made that argument for more than 25 years in Hillsborough County courtrooms, including as former Chief Operations Officer of the Hillsborough County Public Defender’s Office, where I oversaw a staff of over 100 attorneys. I’m Rocky Brancato, founder of The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., a Tampa criminal defense firm, and our attorneys build mitigation into the case from the first week rather than waiting for a sentencing date.

What is a mitigation report in a criminal case?

A mitigation report is an organized, evidence-backed presentation of everything a prosecutor or judge should weigh before deciding what a case is worth. It answers the question behind most plea offers and sentences in Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco courtrooms: who is this person, and what outcome actually protects the community? A one-page character letter does not do that job. A mitigation report is a full social history, with records attached, written so a busy prosecutor can absorb it in one sitting.

Mitigation matters because most criminal cases are decided at the charging and sentencing stages, not at trial. Our firm uses the report in three places: before charges are filed, during plea negotiations, and at a sentencing hearing where we ask the judge for a sentence below the guidelines. Because mental health so often drives mitigation, it is also central to the work on our Tampa criminal mental health lawyer page.

What goes into a mitigation report?

A strong mitigation report covers the client’s whole life, and each point is backed by a record, a witness, or an expert. Our reports typically run many pages and are organized by the areas a Florida court weighs.

The report takes several hours to prepare, and it requires real time from the client, who has to talk honestly about difficult parts of their life. That effort is what makes it persuasive. Prosecutors see form letters every day, and a report with records behind every sentence stands out.

How does a mitigation report support a downward departure in Florida?

A mitigation report supports a downward departure by proving, with evidence, one of the legal reasons Florida allows a judge to sentence below the lowest permissible sentence. Under section 921.0026, Florida Statutes, a departure is prohibited unless circumstances “reasonably justify” it, and the statute lists mitigating circumstances that do.

The Florida Supreme Court described the process in Banks v. State, 732 So. 2d 1065 (Fla. 1999), an aggravated assault case where the victim suffered a permanent eye injury and the trial judge imposed probation and restitution instead of prison. The court reinstated that departure and explained the two steps: first, the judge decides whether a valid legal ground exists and whether the facts supporting it are proved by a preponderance of the evidence; second, the judge decides whether a departure is the best sentence after weighing all the circumstances. A mitigation report is built to win both steps.

The mental health mitigator is the one we prove most often. In State v. Chubbuck, 141 So. 3d 1163 (Fla. 2014), a cocaine trafficking case, the Florida Supreme Court held that a defendant seeking a departure under paragraph (2)(d) must prove three things by a preponderance of the evidence: a qualifying mental disorder or physical disability, a need for specialized treatment, and amenability to that treatment. The court also held that the defendant does not have to prove the Department of Corrections cannot provide the treatment, though the State may offer evidence that it can. A mitigation report is where those three elements are proved.

Is addiction a mitigating factor for a downward departure in Florida?

No, not by itself. Section 921.0026(3) says a defendant’s substance abuse or addiction, including intoxication at the time of the offense, “does not, under any circumstances, justify a downward departure,” with one exception: paragraph (2)(m) allows a departure for a nonviolent felony scoring 60 points or fewer when the defendant qualifies for a postadjudicatory drug court program.

That is why dual diagnosis matters. The paragraph (2)(d) mitigator requires a mental disorder “unrelated to substance abuse or addiction.” When a client struggles with addiction and also has a separate condition, such as depression, PTSD, or a bipolar disorder, the mitigation report documents that separate diagnosis. Once it is established, both conditions can be addressed together in one treatment plan, and the departure rests on the separate disorder. Our guide to how to get a downward departure in Florida covers every statutory mitigator in more detail.

The Legislature considered narrowing this mitigator in 2026. CS/SB 1326 would have limited the mental health mitigator to severe conditions and barred its use for certain offenses, but the bill died in committee on March 13, 2026, so section 921.0026(2)(d) remains in force as written.

How often do Hillsborough County felony cases end below the prison threshold?

Often enough that mitigation is worth doing in nearly every serious case. According to the Florida Department of Corrections’ Criminal Punishment Code report for FY 2023-24, Florida courts sentenced on 85,420 felony scoresheets that year, and 6,309 of them came from the 13th Judicial Circuit in Hillsborough County.

Under the Code, a scoresheet totaling more than 44 points makes state prison the lowest permissible sentence unless the judge departs or another sentencing law applies. Yet in FY 2023-24, 1,400 Hillsborough County scoresheets that scored more than 44 points ended in a county jail sentence, and another 690 ended in probation, according to the same Department of Corrections report. Those outcomes do not happen by accident. They come from plea negotiations and sentencing hearings where the defense gave the State or the judge a documented reason to go lower.

Research backs up what we see in court. In Modern Sentencing Mitigation, 116 Northwestern University Law Review 1395 (2022), Professor John B. Meixner Jr. coded defense sentencing memoranda from federal felony cases and found that mitigating evidence was a central predictor of the sentences judges imposed, with science-based arguments about mental and physical health among the most persuasive. A well-documented report gives the judge the same kind of evidence in a Florida courtroom. Our county work is described on our Hillsborough County criminal defense attorney page.

Why does our firm include the mitigation report in the representation?

Our firm includes the mitigation report because meaningful mitigation is often either missed or sold as an extra. Some attorneys have never prepared one and do not recognize the moments when it would change the result. Others charge a separate fee before anyone builds the client’s story. On the cases that need it, The Brancato Law Firm includes a comprehensive mitigation report as part of the representation, so the work that most often moves a prosecutor is neither overlooked nor gated behind another invoice.

Sometimes a case needs more than our report. A psychosexual evaluation, a forensic risk assessment, or a neuropsychological workup can supply the formal diagnosis or scored risk level a departure requires. When that adds real value, we bring in the right expert, the expert’s fee is paid directly to the expert, and we tell the client up front why we think it is warranted.

When does a case need a mitigation report?

A case needs a mitigation report whenever the outcome depends on the prosecutor’s or judge’s view of the client as a person, which is most felony cases. We prepare one on every case where the client will need it. If we can resolve a case quickly, for example through a pretrial diversion program, a full report may be unnecessary, and we will not ask a client to spend hours on work the case does not require.

Knowing the difference is a skill. My years leading the Public Defender’s Office and handling homicide, sex crime, and child abuse cases in the Major Crimes Unit taught me when a mitigation report is the tool that changes the outcome and when the case can be won another way.

Can a mitigation report stop charges before they are filed?

Yes, sometimes. The State Attorney’s Office reviews a case before deciding what to charge, and during that window our attorneys can present mitigation directly to the assigned prosecutor. In our experience, early mitigation has persuaded prosecutors to file a lesser charge or to decline a case. The earlier we start, the more room we have, which is why we explain the process on our page on representation before charges are filed.

Real results where mitigation made the difference

These are actual outcomes from our office. They show what disciplined mitigation, sometimes ours alone and sometimes paired with an expert and the client’s own treatment, can accomplish.

Child pornography charges reduced to a non-registerable offense (June 2026). Our client faced four counts of possession of child pornography, felonies that would have required lifetime sex offender registration. He contacted the firm after law enforcement visited his home but before any arrest. We moved immediately on mitigation, referring him to treatment and building an extensive mitigation packet that included an independent risk assessment. That mitigation, combined with Rocky Brancato’s review of the files, convinced the prosecutor to reduce the charges to four counts of obscenity, an offense that requires no sex offender registration. The client received a withhold of adjudication and three years of probation.

Below-guidelines probation after a trafficking conviction (July 2025). In a solicitation to commit human trafficking case tried to a jury, the client was convicted. The mitigation work and the treatment he completed before trial led the judge to depart from the guidelines and sentence him to probation. Because of that treatment, he kept contact with his child and was allowed to use the internet on probation, relief that rarely comes with such a conviction.

Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

Frequently asked questions

Who writes the mitigation report in a Florida criminal case?

The defense team writes it, using interviews, records, and when needed an expert’s evaluation. At The Brancato Law Firm, our attorneys and staff prepare the report in-house and present it to the prosecutor or judge ourselves, so the person arguing the case knows every page of it.

Is a mitigation report the same as a presentence investigation report?

No. A presentence investigation (PSI) is prepared by the Department of Corrections at the judge’s request, while a mitigation report is prepared by the defense to advocate for the client. The Brancato Law Firm reviews any PSI for errors and uses our own report to fill in what the PSI leaves out, as described on our criminal mental health defense page.

How long does it take to prepare a mitigation report?

A thorough report takes several hours of client interviews plus the time needed to collect records, which can mean weeks for medical or school files. The Brancato Law Firm starts gathering records early so the report is ready before the plea deadline or sentencing date.

Does a mitigation report help in a sex crime or child pornography case?

Yes. In sex offense cases, treatment, a psychosexual evaluation, and a documented risk assessment can persuade a prosecutor to reduce a charge or a judge to depart, as our June 2026 result shows. The Brancato Law Firm often pairs our report with an independent evaluation in these cases, and our page on pre-file advocacy explains how early that work can start.

Can a mitigation report be used if I already lost at trial?

Yes. A conviction at trial does not prevent a downward departure, and the judge can still weigh mitigation at the sentencing hearing, as happened in our July 2025 trafficking case. The Brancato Law Firm prepares the sentencing presentation while the trial is still being prepared, so nothing is lost if the verdict goes the wrong way.

Does a mitigation report cost extra at The Brancato Law Firm?

No. The report is included in the representation on every case that needs one, and only an outside expert, when one is warranted, is paid separately and directly. The Brancato Law Firm tells clients before any expert is retained what the evaluation will add and why we recommend it.

For how this fits into the rest of a case, see our step-by-step guide to what happens in a Florida criminal case.

Talk to us before the State builds its case

The best time to start a mitigation report is the week of the arrest, or before charges are filed, while records are easy to collect and the prosecutor has not yet made up their mind. Call The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., founded by Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney Rocky Brancato, at (813) 727-7159. You can call us at any hour, and our office is two blocks from the courthouse. Our firm has Spanish-speaking staff, and attorney Jean-Luc Adrien speaks Spanish, Haitian Creole, and French. Read our guide for Spanish-speaking criminal defense clients in Tampa.

For more about our defense strategies, visit our Criminal Mental Health page.

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A.
620 E. Twiggs Street, Suite 205, Tampa, FL 33602
(813) 727-7159
Serving Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. is a Tampa-based criminal defense practice. We are not affiliated with any other Brancato-named law firms.

If a detective has called about your relationship with a 16- or 17-year-old, or you have already been charged under section 794.05, the birth dates and the dates of contact in the police report will shape every decision that follows. I’m Rocky Brancato, founder of The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., a Tampa criminal defense firm. I learned how these cases are built in the Major Crimes Unit of the Hillsborough County Public Defender’s Office, which handled homicide, sex crimes, and child abuse cases, and I have tried more than 150 jury trials to verdict over more than 25 years in Hillsborough County courtrooms. Our attorneys defend section 794.05 charges across Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties, starting with the ages, the dates, and the scoresheet.

What does Florida Statute 794.05 say?

Section 794.05, Florida Statutes, titled “Unlawful sexual activity with certain minors,” makes it a second-degree felony for “a person 24 years of age or older” to engage in sexual activity “with a person 16 or 17 years of age.” People also call this charge sexual conduct with a minor, unlawful sexual conduct with a minor, or statutory rape, but section 794.05 is the statute on the charging document. Our Tampa sex crimes lawyer page explains how The Brancato Law Firm defends this charge and the related offenses below. Florida law defines a minor as anyone who has not turned 18, under section 1.01(13), Florida Statutes, so a 17-year-old is still a minor.

The Florida standard jury instruction for this charge, Instruction 11.7, lists three elements the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt:

Section 794.05 has four more provisions that matter in practice. Sexual activity “does not include an act done for a bona fide medical purpose.” The statute does not apply to a 16- or 17-year-old “who has had the disabilities of nonage removed under chapter 743,” which includes a married minor. The minor’s “prior sexual conduct is not a relevant issue” in the prosecution. And if the offense results in a birth, paternity is established under chapter 742, and an offender found to be the father must pay child support under chapter 61. Our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm build a timeline of both people’s ages against every alleged act before anything else, because a one-day error on either birthday can take a count outside the statute.

The 24-year line has been tested in court. In State v. Walborn, 729 So. 2d 504 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999), a trial judge in the Second District, which hears appeals from Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties, dismissed a section 794.05 charge as a denial of equal protection. The Second District reversed and held the statute constitutional, finding it “reasonably related to the goal of protecting minors from sexual exploitation by adults.” Florida’s line is unusually high. A 2004 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services report prepared by The Lewin Group, Statutory Rape: A Guide to State Laws and Reporting Requirements, found that 16 states set a minimum age for the accused, and Florida’s 24 was the highest listed.

Is consent a defense to unlawful sexual activity with a minor?

No. The elements of section 794.05 say nothing about consent, so if the State proves the ages and the act, the minor’s willingness does not defeat the charge. Florida courts treat section 794.05 as a strict liability crime, which means the State does not have to prove the accused knew the minor’s age or intended to break the law.

A mistake about age is not a defense either. Section 794.021, Florida Statutes, says that when a crime in chapter 794 depends on the victim’s age, “ignorance of the age is no defense,” and neither is “misrepresentation of age” or “a bona fide belief” that the person was older. A fake ID or a dating profile that says 18 does not change the legal answer. Our post on ignorance of the victim’s age in Florida covers this rule across other sex offenses.

Two appellate cases apply that rule directly to section 794.05. In Hodge v. State, 866 So. 2d 1270 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004), a man convicted of sexual activity with a 17-year-old asked for jury instructions requiring proof that he knew her age and acted with criminal intent. The Fourth District held that “the legislature left no doubt as to its intention that this offense be treated as a strict liability crime,” and affirmed. In Feliciano v. State, 937 So. 2d 818 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006), a 26-year-old whose relationship began two months after the girl’s 17th birthday argued that punishing him without proof he knew her age violated due process. The First District rejected that challenge and affirmed. Because the law closes these doors, The Brancato Law Firm puts the defense where the State still carries the burden: the ages, the dates, and whether the act happened.

What are the penalties for unlawful sexual activity with a minor in Florida?

Unlawful sexual activity with a minor is a second-degree felony carrying up to 15 years in prison under section 775.082, Florida Statutes, and a fine of up to $10,000 under section 775.083, Florida Statutes. The legal ramifications reach well past the sentence itself.

Section 794.05 carries no mandatory minimum sentence. The real floor comes from the Criminal Punishment Code scoresheet, explained in the next section, and that is where our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm do much of their sentencing work.

How does the Florida scoresheet score a section 794.05 conviction?

The scoresheet usually calls for prison, even for a person with no record, because Florida adds points for the sexual act itself. Section 921.0022, Florida Statutes, ranks section 794.05(1) as a Level 6 offense, worth 36 points. Section 921.0021(7)(b), Florida Statutes, then requires 80 points for sexual penetration “regardless of whether there is evidence of any physical injury,” or 40 points for sexual contact without penetration. Under section 921.0024, Florida Statutes, any total above 44 points produces a minimum prison sentence: subtract 28 and multiply by 0.75.

The difference between penetration and union is worth fighting over. In Neira v. State, 847 So. 2d 1134 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), a 17-year-old testified that she had consensual intercourse with the defendant, and he denied penetration. The judge scored 80 penetration points instead of 40 contact points, which raised the lowest permissible sentence from 36 months to 66.15 months, and imposed 66.15 months. The Fourth District affirmed, holding that the jury did not have to make a separate penetration finding for scoresheet purposes, and certified the question to the Florida Supreme Court as one of great public importance. The lesson for anyone charged today: the nature of the act decides roughly two and a half years of the minimum sentence, so The Brancato Law Firm contests it with the evidence, the charging language, and the verdict form.

Section 794.05 cases are far less common than other sex charges, and a high score does not always mean prison in Hillsborough County. Scoresheets received by the Florida Department of Corrections (FDC) for sentences from July 1, 2023, through June 30, 2024, cited section 794.05 62 times, compared with 589 for section 800.04 and 472 for section 794.011, according to the FDC report Florida’s Criminal Punishment Code: Assessment and Analysis (2024). The same report shows that in fiscal year 2023-24, Hillsborough County judges sentenced 2,235 of the 3,594 felony scoresheets of all types that scored more than 44 points and recorded a sanction to county jail, probation, or community control instead of state prison.

Can a judge sentence below the scoresheet if the teen was a willing participant?

Yes. Consent is not a defense at trial, but Florida law lets a judge consider it at sentencing. Section 921.0026(2)(f), Florida Statutes, lists as a mitigating circumstance that “the victim was an initiator, willing participant, aggressor, or provoker of the incident,” and that ground can support a downward departure, meaning a sentence below the scoresheet minimum.

The Florida Supreme Court settled the question in State v. Rife, 789 So. 2d 288 (Fla. 2001). Ronald Rife was convicted of three counts of sexual battery on a 17-year-old who had moved into his home, under a statute that says the minor’s willingness “is not a defense.” Both testified the relationship was consensual and that they planned to marry when she turned 18. His scoresheet minimum was 297.4 months, about 24 years, and the trial judge departed to 102 months followed by 10 years of probation. The court approved the departure, holding that judges are not barred as a matter of law from relying on a minor’s willing participation, while cautioning that the judge must weigh “the victim’s age and maturity and the totality of the facts” and that a young person’s failure to resist “is not the same as willing participation.”

The Second District applied that rule to a section 794.05 case in Rivera v. State, 1 So. 3d 1158 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009). Nelson Rivera pleaded no contest to unlawful sexual activity with a minor and received 10 years in prison. He later claimed his lawyer never presented mitigation, including that the girl had lied about her age. The Second District reversed the summary denial of his claim and sent it back for further proceedings, noting that the sentencing court could have considered her willing participation as mitigation under Rife, even though her misrepresentation of age was no defense to the charge. Mitigation only helps if someone builds it and presents it, which is why The Brancato Law Firm prepares a written mitigation package, with records and witnesses, before any sentencing hearing. Our guide to how to get a downward departure in Florida explains the other legal grounds.

Does a 794.05 conviction require sex offender registration?

Yes. Section 943.0435, Florida Statutes, lists section 794.05 as a qualifying offense, and it defines “convicted” to include a guilty or no contest plea “regardless of whether adjudication is withheld.” A withhold of adjudication, which avoids a formal conviction for most other purposes, does not avoid registration here.

• Initial registration: in person at the sheriff’s office within 48 hours after conviction, or within 48 hours after release from Department of Corrections custody.
• Reregistration: in person twice a year, during the birth month and six months later. Section 794.05 is not on the list of offenses that require reporting every three months.
• Duration: for life, unless a court grants removal. Section 943.0435(11) allows a petition after at least 25 years from release from confinement or supervision, with no arrest for any felony or misdemeanor since release.
• Sexual predator risk: under section 775.21, Florida Statutes, a section 794.05 conviction can lead to sexual predator designation when the person has a prior conviction for a listed sex offense.

Where a person can live depends on whether they are on supervision. Florida’s statutory 1,000-foot residency restriction, section 775.215, applies to listed offenses where the victim was under 16, and section 794.05 is not on that list. Probation is different. For a chapter 794 offense, section 948.30, Florida Statutes, requires a 10 p.m. to 6 a.m. curfew, sex offender treatment at the probationer’s expense, and, when the victim was under 18, a ban on living within 1,000 feet of a school, child care facility, park, or playground and on contact with children under 18 without court approval. Our post on sex offender probation rules in Florida covers those conditions in detail.

Registration touches thousands of people in Tampa Bay. As of October 2024, 1,999 registered sex offenders lived in Hillsborough County communities, 1,579 in Pinellas County, and 872 in Pasco County, according to the Florida Legislature’s Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability in Report 24-11 (2024). Because registration follows a plea as surely as a guilty verdict, our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm look first for a resolution to an offense that does not require registration, as several of the results below show. Our guide to sex offender registration in Florida explains the reporting rules.

Does Florida’s Romeo and Juliet law apply to section 794.05?

No. Florida’s Romeo and Juliet law, section 943.04354, Florida Statutes, lets a court remove the registration requirement only for convictions under section 800.04, section 827.071, or section 847.0135(5), and only when the minor was 13 to 17 and the offender was not more than 4 years older. Section 794.05 is not on that list. The age math rules it out anyway: a person 24 or older is always more than 4 years older than a 16- or 17-year-old.

The Romeo and Juliet law is also not a defense to any charge; it only affects registration after a conviction for a qualifying offense. For a section 794.05 registrant, the realistic path off the registry is the 25-year petition described above. Our Romeo and Juliet registry removal guide explains who qualifies, and our article on the age of consent in Florida lays out which age combinations are legal. The Brancato Law Firm reviews registration consequences, including any removal path, before a client decides on a plea.

How is section 794.05 different from lewd or lascivious battery and sexual battery?

The younger person’s age and whether there was consent decide which statute applies. Section 794.05 covers only 16- and 17-year-olds with a partner 24 or older. Section 800.04, Florida Statutes, covers anyone under 16, whatever the other person’s age. Section 794.011, Florida Statutes, the sexual battery law, covers acts without consent and acts by a parent or other person in familial or custodial authority.

The scoresheet also separates these charges. Section 921.0022 ranks lewd or lascivious battery at Level 8, two levels above section 794.05, so the same act scores higher when the younger person is 15 than when the younger person is 16. A claim that a 16- or 17-year-old did not consent changes the case entirely, because it turns a second-degree felony into a first-degree sexual battery charge. Our guides on how to fight a lewd and lascivious charge and how to fight a sexual battery charge in Florida cover those statutes, and The Brancato Law Firm defends every charge in this group.

What defenses work against an unlawful sexual activity charge?

The strongest defenses attack the facts the State must prove: the two ages, the dates, and the act. These are the issues our attorneys work through in every section 794.05 case.

1. The accused was under 24 on the date of the act. Section 794.05 does not reach a 23-year-old. We match the accused’s birth date against each alleged date, because acts before the 24th birthday fall outside the statute even if later acts do not.
2. The minor was not 16 or 17 on that date. The State must prove the minor’s age with competent evidence, usually birth records. If the minor had turned 18, section 794.05 does not apply; if the minor was 15 or younger, the charge is the wrong statute, and the State must charge and prove a different offense.
3. No sexual activity as the statute defines it. Kissing or touching that is not penetration or union is not “sexual activity” under section 794.05. Whether the act was penetration or union also changes the scoresheet by 40 points.
4. The accusation is not reliable. Many of these cases rest on one person’s account. We collect texts, social media, location data, and school and work records that confirm or contradict the timeline, and we look for reasons the account changed.
5. The minor was emancipated or married. Section 794.05 does not apply to a minor whose disabilities of nonage were removed, and section 743.01, Florida Statutes, removes them for a minor who is or has been married. In Hodge, the Fourth District held this exception is an affirmative defense, so the accused must come forward with evidence of it. Under current law, section 741.04, Florida Statutes, allows a Florida marriage license for a 17-year-old only with parental consent and a spouse no more than 2 years older, so this defense mostly arises from out-of-state marriages or court-ordered emancipation.
6. The statement or controlled call can be challenged. Many cases are built on an interview or a recorded call that the minor or a parent makes at a detective’s direction. Our article on fighting a false confession in a Florida sex crime case explains how we challenge those statements.
7. Mitigation, if the facts are proven. When the evidence is strong, the willing participation mitigator under Rife, the client’s history, and treatment evaluations can support a sentence below the scoresheet or a negotiated plea to an offense that does not require registration.

A defense does not need a dramatic theory to work. In a case involving a 27-year-old and a 16-year-old, The Brancato Law Firm won a dismissal by showing that the accuser’s account did not hold together, as the results below show.

What should you do if a detective calls about a 16- or 17-year-old?

Decline the interview and call a defense lawyer before you say anything. In a section 794.05 investigation, consent is not a defense, so an admission that a relationship existed can supply most of the State’s case. Detectives often keep the tone friendly and say they “know it was consensual,” and some cases begin with a controlled call from the minor or a parent before any contact from police.

• Do not call, text, or message the minor or the minor’s family about the allegation.
• Do not delete anything. Messages and photos that show dates can prove when a birthday passed or when contact stopped.
• Do not post about the relationship or the investigation on social media.
• Write down the detective’s name, agency, and case number, and give them to your lawyer.

The weeks before an arrest are the best time to act. Our representation before charges are filed can include speaking with the detective for you and presenting information to the State Attorney’s Office before it decides whether to file.

If an arrest has already happened in Hillsborough County, expect to stay in jail until a judge sees you. Section 903.011, Florida Statutes, bars release before first appearance for anyone arrested for a second-degree felony, and the 13th Judicial Circuit’s 2026 bond schedule, Administrative Order S-2025-063, leaves second-degree felonies for a judge to decide. In Hillsborough County, first appearance happens within 24 hours of arrest, by video from the jail, and the judge usually sets no-contact conditions along with any bond. Our Hillsborough County criminal defense attorney page explains what comes next.

Real results in cases involving 16- and 17-year-olds

Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. More results are on our case results page.

Frequently Asked Questions About Unlawful Sexual Activity With a Minor

Can unlawful sexual activity charges be dropped if the teen does not want to cooperate?

They can, but the decision belongs to the State Attorney’s Office, not the minor or the minor’s parents. The Brancato Law Firm has had an unlawful sexual conduct charge involving a 16-year-old dismissed, and a case involving a 17-year-old closed with a letter of release that reflected the alleged victim’s wishes, and our sex crimes defense attorneys push for that outcome from the first week.

Is all sexual activity between an adult and a minor illegal in Florida?

No. Consensual sexual activity between a 16- or 17-year-old and an adult partner under 24 does not violate section 794.05, although other laws, such as those covering school employees, custodial adults, and explicit images, can still apply. The Brancato Law Firm checks every one of those statutes against the facts, and our guide to the Florida age of consent maps the age combinations.

What charge applies if the younger partner is 15 instead of 16?

Sexual activity with a 15-year-old is lewd or lascivious battery under section 800.04(4), a second-degree felony, whether the other person is 18, 23, or 40, and consent is not a defense. Our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm defend those cases with the same focus on ages and dates, as our article on lewd and lascivious charges in Florida explains.

What is the minimum sentence for unlawful sexual activity with a minor in Florida?

There is no mandatory minimum, but a single count involving penetration scores a lowest permissible sentence of 66 months in prison for a person with no record. The Brancato Law Firm attacks the penetration points and builds departure grounds, such as willing participation under State v. Rife, as described in our guide to downward departures in Florida.

Does a withhold of adjudication avoid sex offender registration for section 794.05?

No. Section 943.0435 requires registration for a section 794.05 plea or verdict “regardless of whether adjudication is withheld.” That is why The Brancato Law Firm negotiates toward offenses that carry no registration requirement, and our page on Florida sex offender registration lists what registrants must report.

Can a woman be charged with unlawful sexual activity with a minor in Florida?

Yes. Section 794.05 applies to “a person 24 years of age or older,” so it covers women and men equally, and it applies whether the minor is a boy or a girl. The Brancato Law Firm defends women and men accused under this statute, often through pre-file advocacy that starts before any arrest.

Can I be charged if I did not know my partner was 17?

Yes. Section 794.021 makes ignorance of age, a lie about age, and a good-faith belief that the person was older no defense. The Brancato Law Firm still documents what the accused was told and shown, because those facts can matter in plea negotiations and at sentencing, as our post on mistake of age in Florida sex cases explains.

Talk to a lawyer before you talk to the detective

Our attorneys start by contacting the detective so you are never interviewed alone, then lock down the birth dates, messages, and records that decide whether section 794.05 even applies. The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., founded by Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney Rocky Brancato, defends unlawful sexual activity charges from the first phone call through trial and sentencing. The days before an arrest are when our attorneys can do the most, so call (813) 727-7159 now for a free, confidential consultation. You can call us at any hour, and our office is two blocks from the courthouse. Our firm has Spanish-speaking staff, and attorney Jean-Luc Adrien speaks Spanish, Haitian Creole, and French. Read about our Spanish and Haitian Creole criminal defense services.

For more about our defense strategies, visit our Sex Crimes page.

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A.

620 E. Twiggs Street, Suite 205, Tampa, FL 33602

(813) 727-7159

Serving Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. is a Tampa-based criminal defense practice. We are not affiliated with any other Brancato-named law firms.

I’m Rocky Brancato, founder of The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., a Tampa criminal defense firm. I have spent more than 25 years in Hillsborough County courtrooms, including as Chief Operations Officer of the Hillsborough County Public Defender’s Office, where I oversaw a staff of over 100 attorneys. Today our attorneys build departure cases the way appellate courts now require: with a valid legal ground, real evidence, and a clean record.

What is a downward departure in Florida?

A downward departure is any felony sentence below the “lowest permissible sentence” (LPS) that the scoresheet produces. Under section 921.0026, Florida Statutes, a judge may not go below that number “unless there are circumstances or factors that reasonably justify the downward departure.”

The scoresheet assigns points for the main offense, any additional offenses, prior record, victim injury, and legal status such as being on probation. Under section 921.0024, once total points exceed 44, the LPS in prison months is the total points minus 28, multiplied by 0.75. A defendant who scores 100 points faces a minimum of 54 months in state prison.

A “nonstate prison sanction” means county jail of up to 364 days, probation, or community control. That is why judges often pronounce “one year and one day” when they intend a state prison sentence.

A departure does not have to mean probation. In Lee v. State, No. 2D2025-0078 (Fla. 2d DCA June 12, 2026), the trial judge believed the only departure option was reinstating probation. The Second District Court of Appeal reversed, explaining that the judge also had the power to impose a prison term shorter than the 77.475-month LPS.

How often do Tampa Bay judges sentence below the scoresheet?

Departures are common, and Hillsborough County departs more often than the state as a whole. In fiscal year 2023-24, Hillsborough County judges sentenced 2,235 of 3,594 felony defendants who scored more than 44 points to county jail, probation, or community control instead of state prison, about 62%, according to the Florida Department of Corrections Criminal Punishment Code report. Because state prison was the minimum for every one of those defendants, each of those sentences was below the scoresheet.

Source: Florida Department of Corrections, Florida’s Criminal Punishment Code: Assessment and Analysis (FY 2023-24), pp. 26, 28-29. Percentages are calculated from the report’s counts. The report notes that scoresheet submission was 77.4% complete statewide, and shorter prison terms below the LPS are not separated out, so the true departure rate is likely higher.

Most of these sentences come from negotiated pleas, where the State agrees to the departure. The rest come from contested hearings where the defense proves a mitigating circumstance over the State’s objection. That second group is where the quality of the evidence decides the outcome.

The data also undercut the idea that departures are a public safety risk. A 2019 study by the Florida Legislature’s Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability (OPPAGA Report 19-01) compared matched offenders who scored above 44 points. Offenders who received community supervision had a two-year felony reconviction rate of 23.4%, compared with 28.8% for similar offenders released from prison. The same 2019 report estimated that at least 41% of statewide cases scoring above 44 points ended in a departure.

What are the legal grounds for a downward departure in Florida?

Section 921.0026(2) lists 14 mitigating circumstances. Proving any one of them by a preponderance of the evidence gives the judge legal authority to depart. Only one valid reason is needed to support a departure.

Ground (j) trips up more defendants than any other because remorse is not enough by itself. In State v. Sweeney, the Second District reversed a departure where the defendant was remorseful but the offense was neither unsophisticated nor isolated. By contrast, in State v. VanBebber, 848 So. 2d 1046 (Fla. 2003), the Florida Supreme Court upheld a (j) departure in a felony DUI case and held that the statute’s intoxication bar does not block the other mitigators.

Youthful offender sentencing has its own rules, which we cover in our guide to youthful offender sentencing in Florida.

Can a judge depart for a reason that is not on the statutory list?

Yes, but only if the reason fits Florida’s sentencing policy. The statutory list “includes, but is not limited to” the 14 grounds, and courts have upheld unlisted reasons supported by competent, substantial evidence. In State v. Stephenson, 973 So. 2d 1259 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008), the court said a judge may depart “for reasons not delineated in section 921.0026, so long as the reason given is supported by competent, substantial evidence and not otherwise prohibited.”

The Second District, which hears appeals from Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties, adds a limit. An unlisted reason must be “consistent with legislative sentencing policies,” and it generally has to reduce the defendant’s culpability for the crime. In Rafferty v. State, 799 So. 2d 243 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001), the court explained that mitigating circumstances “ameliorate the level of the defendant’s culpability.” A reason that says nothing about the crime, the defendant’s conduct, or the defendant’s mental state is unlikely to survive an appeal.

What did the court decide in State v. Mathis about volunteer work and small drug amounts?

In State v. Mathis, No. 2D2025-2309 (Fla. 2d DCA Oct. 9, 2026), the Second District held that a small drug quantity, volunteer work in jail, and community service talks are not valid grounds for a downward departure.

Wayne Mathis was convicted by a Manatee County jury of selling 0.8 grams of crack cocaine within 1,000 feet of a church. His lowest permissible sentence was 69.75 months in prison. His record included 18 prior felonies, and he qualified as a violent felony offender of special concern. His own lawyer did not ask for a departure and conceded there was no legal basis for one.

The trial judge departed anyway. He sentenced Mathis to one year of community control followed by two years of drug offender probation, citing three reasons:

1. The small amount of cocaine.
2. Mathis’s 5,776 hours of volunteer work in the jail kitchen while awaiting trial.
3. His talks to young people at Teen Court.

The State appealed and won. The Second District rejected all three reasons:

• Drug quantity. “Departing based on the quantity of drugs involved in the offense is not consistent with legislative sentencing policy,” because the Legislature already uses quantity to set drug penalties.
• The judge’s view of the guidelines. A judge’s personal belief that the LPS “overstates the seriousness of the offense” is not a valid reason.
• Volunteer and community work. The court called the jail work “undeniably laudable” but held that it “does not relate to the nature of the crime itself or to Mathis’s offense conduct or level of culpability.” The court added that it “could find no ‘case law that suggests that good work in the community is a valid basis for departure.’”

The court also noted that rewarding good behavior in custody is the Department of Corrections’ job through gain time under section 944.275. A departure on that basis was “an impermissible end run around the Department.”

The case went back for resentencing. The trial judge may still depart on a different, valid ground, as the Florida Supreme Court allowed in Jackson v. State, 64 So. 3d 90 (Fla. 2011).

The lesson for anyone facing sentencing in Tampa Bay is direct. Good character, steady work, and community service still matter when a judge picks a sentence inside the legal range. On their own, they are not a legal basis to go below the scoresheet, and a departure built only on them invites a State appeal and a second sentencing hearing.

Which departure reasons do Florida courts reject?

Courts reject reasons that have nothing to do with the crime or the defendant’s culpability, and reasons the Legislature has already accounted for. The table below compares rejected grounds with grounds that held up when the defense presented the right evidence.

We wrote about the Morgan autism case in detail in Florida Court Reverses Sentence: Judge Ignored Autism Evidence.

Does drug addiction count as a reason for a downward departure?

Not by itself. Section 921.0026(3) says a defendant’s “substance abuse or addiction, including intoxication at the time of the offense, is not a mitigating factor” and “does not, under any circumstances, justify a downward departure.” The statute carves out one exception: ground (m), the drug court mitigator.

Ground (m) applies when the offense is a nonviolent felony, the scoresheet total is 60 points or fewer, and the judge finds the defendant amenable to a post-adjudicatory treatment-based drug court program. In Hillsborough County, that program runs through Adult Drug Treatment Court, Division “W.” Administrative Order S-2026-002, effective February 2, 2026, sets the same 60-point and nonviolent-felony limits for its post-adjudicatory track. You can read more about local procedure on our Hillsborough County criminal defense page.

A defendant who struggles with addiction may also qualify under ground (d) if a separate mental health condition exists independently of the substance use. A qualified evaluator must document that the disorder is “unrelated to substance abuse or addiction.” For defendants whose mental illness drives the case, Hillsborough also operates a Mental Health Criminal Division, Division “M,” under Administrative Order S-2023-046. Our Tampa criminal mental health lawyer page explains how we build those cases.

How do you prove a mitigating circumstance at a sentencing hearing?

You prove it with evidence, usually expert evidence, by a preponderance of the evidence. Arguments from counsel and letters from family rarely carry a contested departure. Under Banks v. State, 732 So. 2d 1065 (Fla. 1999), the judge decides two questions. First, can the court depart, meaning is there a valid legal ground supported by evidence? Second, should the court depart, considering the whole case?

The Second District enforces the first step strictly. In State v. Caulkins, a Hillsborough County case, the trial judge departed after hearing about the defendant’s upbringing, abuse, and addictions. The Second District reversed because no expert testimony connected those facts to a statutory ground. Without competent, substantial evidence, the departure could not stand.

For the mental health ground, the Florida Supreme Court held in Chubbuck that the defense does not have to prove the Department of Corrections cannot provide treatment. The defense must prove three things: a qualifying mental disorder or physical disability, a need for specialized treatment, and amenability to that treatment. The State may still argue that prison treatment is adequate, and the judge may weigh that at step two.

There are two ways to build this evidence:

A standard evaluation often works when the State is willing to agree to a departure. When the State opposes it, the judge needs more. Licensed counselors and clinical social workers who work as mitigation specialists in capital cases can build the same kind of life history in a serious noncapital case. Our post on why a comprehensive mitigation report sets our firm apart explains how our attorneys put these packages together.

The plan matters as much as the diagnosis. Judges are elected, and every departure is a judgment call that the judge has to defend if the defendant reoffends. A package with identified treatment providers, a work plan, and documented family support gives the judge a record to stand on.

Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

Can the State appeal a downward departure sentence?

Yes. Section 921.0026(1) makes a sentence below the LPS subject to appellate review, but “the extent of downward departure is not subject to appellate review.” The State can argue that the reason was legally invalid or unsupported by evidence. It cannot argue that the judge went too far below the guidelines.

The State does not need to make a detailed objection to preserve the issue in the Second District. In Mathis, a general objection and a statement that the State reserved its right to appeal were enough.

If the State wins, what happens next depends on how the case was resolved. The judge may depart again on a valid ground at resentencing under Jackson. A defendant who entered an open plea generally cannot withdraw it and faces a guidelines sentence if no valid ground exists, as in State v. Brannum, 876 So. 2d 724 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). A defendant whose plea depended on the departure may be offered the choice to withdraw the plea, as in Paulk.

Can you appeal if the judge refuses to grant a downward departure?

Yes. In Parrish v. State, No. SC2022-1457 (Fla. June 18, 2026), the Florida Supreme Court held that “a district court has jurisdiction to review a denial of a downward departure.” Before Parrish, the First District had refused to hear these appeals at all.

Having the right to appeal is not the same as winning. On remand, the First District affirmed Parrish’s 30-year sentence, applying its earlier en banc decision in Gazoombi v. State, 406 So. 3d 371 (Fla. 1st DCA 2025): “a bald assertion that the trial court should have imposed a sentence different from the one it did is not a cognizable claim for appellate relief.” Appellate courts reverse refusals to depart when the judge made a legal error.

The First District disagreed with the Second District’s approach in Manyak in a September 2026 decision, so the Florida Supreme Court may eventually resolve that split. For now, the Second District’s rule governs sentencing in Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties. That makes the hearing record decisive: the defense should ask the judge for findings on each Banks step.

A related problem arises when the LPS is higher than the statutory maximum. We explain that situation in what happens when the lowest permissible sentence exceeds the maximum.

What should you do before your sentencing date?

Start building the departure case as soon as you are charged, not the week before sentencing. A credible evaluation, collateral interviews, and a treatment plan take weeks to assemble, and treatment you begin before sentencing is itself evidence of amenability.

A practical timeline looks like this:

1. Right after arrest or charging: have counsel score the case so you know whether you are above 44 points and what the LPS is.
2. During discovery: identify which statutory ground fits the facts and retain the right evaluator or mitigation specialist.
3. Before plea negotiations: share the mitigation package with the prosecutor, because a negotiated ground (a) departure is the most common path.
4. At a contested hearing: present live expert testimony, and ask the judge to make findings on both Banks steps.
5. Within 7 days after sentencing: confirm the judge filed written reasons, as section 921.00265(2) requires.

Mitigation can begin even before charges are filed. Our pre-file advocacy work sometimes puts mitigation in front of prosecutors before they decide what to charge. Deciding whether to accept an offer is its own decision, which we cover in how to decide whether to accept a plea bargain in Florida.

For more about our defense strategies, visit our Criminal Mental Health page.

Frequently asked questions about downward departures

Does community service or volunteer work count toward a downward departure in Florida?

Not as a stand-alone legal ground in the Second District. State v. Mathis held in October 2026 that volunteer work in jail and community service talks do not relate to the crime or the defendant’s culpability, so they cannot justify a sentence below the scoresheet. At The Brancato Law Firm, we still present a client’s work and service history, but we tie the departure request to a statutory ground backed by evidence.

Can drug addiction get you a downward departure in Florida?

Only through the drug court ground or a separate mental health condition. Section 921.0026(3) bars addiction as a mitigator except under ground (m), which requires a nonviolent felony, 60 points or fewer, and amenability to a post-adjudicatory drug court program. As a Tampa drug crimes attorney practice, The Brancato Law Firm screens clients for Hillsborough’s Division “W” drug court track and for independent mental health diagnoses that can support ground (d).

Can I appeal if the judge denies my motion for downward departure?

Yes, but you need a legal error to win. Parrish v. State (Fla. 2026) confirmed that appellate courts can review a denial, and the Second District reverses when a judge misunderstood its discretion, applied a blanket policy, or failed to make clear findings. Our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm make the record at the sentencing hearing with that appeal in mind, including asking for findings on both Banks steps.

What happens if the State appeals my downward departure and wins?

You return for resentencing, and the judge may depart again on a valid ground. If you entered an open plea, you generally cannot withdraw it, and the judge must impose a guidelines sentence unless a valid departure ground exists. The Brancato Law Firm prepares a backup ground with its own evidence so a reversed departure does not automatically mean prison.

Does an open plea count as a plea bargain for a downward departure?

No. Ground (a) requires a “legitimate, uncoerced plea bargain,” which means an agreement with the State that the court approves, as State v. Beck explains. When there is no agreement, The Brancato Law Firm builds the departure case on another statutory ground supported by expert testimony.

Can a downward departure be a shorter prison sentence instead of probation?

Yes. In Lee v. State (Fla. 2d DCA 2026), the Second District reversed because the judge did not realize it could impose a prison term below the LPS rather than only probation. When probation is not realistic, our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm ask for a reduced prison term and explain to the court that it has that option.

Do I have to prove the prison system cannot treat my mental illness?

No. State v. Chubbuck (Fla. 2014) held that ground (d) does not require proof that the Department of Corrections cannot provide treatment, although the judge may consider prison treatment when deciding whether to depart. Through our criminal mental health defense practice, The Brancato Law Firm presents a specific community treatment plan so the judge can compare it with what prison offers.

How long does the judge have to file written reasons for a downward departure?

Seven days. Section 921.00265(2) requires a written statement of reasons, or a transcript of reasons stated orally, filed within 7 days after sentencing. Our team at The Brancato Law Firm checks the court file after every departure to confirm the reasons were filed and match what the judge said.

For how this fits into the rest of a case, see our guide to each stage of a Florida criminal case.

Talk to a Tampa criminal defense attorney about your sentencing

If you or someone you love is facing a felony that scores prison, the attorneys of The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., founded by Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney Rocky Brancato, can evaluate whether a downward departure is realistic and start building the evidence now. Call (813) 727-7159. The sooner the mitigation work starts, the more of it a judge will see.

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A.
620 E. Twiggs Street, Suite 205, Tampa, FL 33602
(813) 727-7159
Serving Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. is a Tampa-based criminal defense practice. We are not affiliated with any other Brancato-named law firms.

Morgan v. State Reinforces That Trial Courts Must Consider Mental Health Evidence When Sentencing

When Judges Believe They Have No Choice

What happens when a defendant presents compelling mental health evidence at sentencing, but the judge ignores it? In Morgan v. State, decided December 31, 2025, Florida’s Second District Court of Appeal answered that question: the sentence gets reversed.

Winston Morgan faced serious charges—forty counts of possession of child pornography and one count of transmission. He pleaded no contest. Under Florida’s Criminal Punishment Code, his scoresheet called for a minimum sentence of nearly 45 years in prison. However, Morgan’s defense team presented unrebutted evidence at an evidentiary hearing over two days: Morgan had been diagnosed with autism, and his condition included documented social deficits along with compulsive, repetitive, and obsessive features inherent to that diagnosis.

The State did not rebut this evidence. Nevertheless, the trial court denied the motion for downward departure, stating it had “no alternative” but to sentence Morgan according to his scoresheet. That statement was legally incorrect—and it cost the trial court its sentence.

The Two-Step Test for Downward Departure

Florida law permits judges to impose sentences below the guidelines minimum when mitigating circumstances exist. The process is governed by Banks v. State, 732 So. 2d 1065 (Fla. 1999), which established a two-step test:

The critical distinction: Step 1 asks whether the court has the legal authority to depart. Step 2 asks whether it should exercise that authority. A trial court that never reaches Step 2 because it mistakenly believes it failed Step 1 has committed reversible error.

What Went Wrong in Morgan

Morgan’s defense team argued for a downward departure on multiple grounds, including his autism diagnosis. They presented unrebutted expert evidence over two days documenting his condition—the social deficits, the compulsive and repetitive behaviors, the obsessive features that are inherent to autism spectrum disorder.

At the conclusion of the hearing, the trial court made a critical misstatement: “The only way around the bottom of the guidelines is to make a determination that [Mr. Morgan] qualifies for a downward departure under [section] 921.0026. And what’s been argued before the Court today is a downward departure for youthful offender.”

This was factually incorrect. The defense had argued for departure based on Morgan’s autism—not just the youthful offender ground. The trial court then ruled: “I don’t think it’s appropriate for me to sentence [Mr. Morgan] as a youthful offender. Which leaves me with no alternative but to sentence him on Counts I through XLIV to 536.550 months.”

Mental Health Conditions as Grounds for Departure

Section 921.0026, Florida Statutes, lists specific mitigating circumstances that can support a downward departure. However, the Second DCA emphasized a crucial point: this list is not exhaustive.

This means mental health conditions like autism, when properly documented and presented with expert testimony, can serve as valid grounds for departure—even if not specifically listed in the statute. The key requirements are competent, substantial evidence and a logical connection between the condition and the appropriateness of a reduced sentence.

Statutory Mitigating Factors Under § 921.0026(2)

The Remedy: Resentencing Before a Different Judge

The Second DCA did not merely reverse Morgan’s sentence—it ordered resentencing before a different judge. This remedy, while not automatic, is appropriate when the original sentencing judge has demonstrated a fundamental misunderstanding of the applicable law or the record.

The court cited Barnhill v. State, 140 So. 3d 1055 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014). In that case, the Second DCA reversed and remanded for resentencing before a different judge because the trial court failed to apply the Banks test to determine if the defendant qualified for a downward departure.

What This Means for Defendants with Mental Health Conditions

Morgan v. State reinforces several important principles for defendants facing serious charges who have documented mental health conditions:

First, present evidence at an evidentiary hearing. Morgan’s defense team held a two-day evidentiary hearing with expert testimony about his autism diagnosis. This created a record the appellate court could review.

Second, ensure the evidence is unrebutted if possible. The State presented no contrary evidence regarding Morgan’s diagnosis. Unrebutted evidence of a mitigating factor is powerful on appeal.

Third, make the record clear. Defense counsel explicitly argued for departure based on the autism diagnosis. When the trial court misstated the record, the appellate court had clear evidence of the error.

Fourth, understand that the statutory list is not exhaustive. Mental health conditions not specifically listed in § 921.0026(2) can still support departure if competent, substantial evidence establishes a basis for mitigation.

Frequently Asked Questions: Downward Departure in Florida

620 E Twiggs Street, Suite 205, Tampa, FL 33602

Serving Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties

For how this fits into the rest of a case, see our overview of how a Florida criminal case moves from investigation to appeal.

Related Articles

• What is a Downward Departure in Florida?
• Mental Health Defense in Tampa – Treatment Over Prison
• Competency to Proceed in Tampa