If you were arrested after an online conversation that turned out to be with a detective, the chat log is now the State’s whole case, and how that conversation started matters as much as how it ended. I’m Rocky Brancato, founder of The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., a Tampa criminal defense firm, and before private practice I handled sex crimes and child abuse cases in the Major Crimes Unit of the Hillsborough County Public Defender’s Office, where I later served as Chief Operations Officer overseeing a staff of over 100 attorneys. Our attorneys are currently litigating entrapment motions in Hillsborough County Sheriff’s Office sting cases, and we read every message in the chat before deciding how to fight the charge.

What Is Solicitation of a Child Using a Computer in Florida?

It is knowingly using an electronic device to try to get a child, or someone you believe is a child, into unlawful sexual conduct. Section 847.0135(3), Florida Statutes, covers “a computer online service, Internet service, local bulletin board service, or any other device capable of electronic data storage or transmission,” which includes phones, texting, and dating or social media apps. The statute creates two versions of the offense:

The statute states that “the fact that an undercover operative or law enforcement officer was involved in the detection and investigation of an offense under this section shall not constitute a defense.” That sentence does not eliminate entrapment. It means the use of a decoy is not a defense by itself, and the defense must show how the decoy acted. Our Tampa internet crimes attorney page explains how these investigations are run.

What Are the Penalties for Solicitation of a Child Using a Computer?

The base offense is a third-degree felony, and the penalties grow with the facts and the number of charges. The statute also says that “each separate use” of a device in which an offense is committed “may be charged as a separate offense,” so a multi-day chat can become several counts.

A conviction under section 847.0135, other than subsection (6), makes a person a “sexual offender” who must register under section 943.0435. The two-way communications device offense under section 934.215 is not on that registration list. In negotiated cases, whether a plea is entered to the solicitation charge as filed or to an amended charge can decide whether a client registers for life, so our attorneys check the registration consequence of every offer. Our guide to sex offender registration in Florida covers what registration requires.

How Do Online Sex Stings Work in Tampa Bay?

Most solicitation cases in Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties come from proactive stings, and the volume is large. Internet Crimes Against Children task forces nationwide conducted nearly 347,000 investigations and arrested more than 17,000 offenders in 2025, according to the U.S. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, which funds 61 task forces.

In our practice, Hillsborough County Sheriff’s Office stings follow two patterns. In decoy-profile stings, a deputy posts or answers an ad as an adult, then reveals a teenage age once the conversation is under way. In reverse stings, a deputy plays an adult, such as a mother or aunt, who offers access to a child, and those cases often add a human trafficking solicitation count. The leading Florida Supreme Court case on these charges began the same way: in State v. Shelley, 176 So. 3d 914 (Fla. 2015), Dean Shelley answered a Craigslist ad in Hillsborough County posted by an officer posing as a single mother, arranged over several days to meet her and her fictitious ten-year-old daughter, and was arrested when he arrived.

Research suggests sting arrestees differ from offenders who target real children. A study of arrests from July 2000 to June 2001, Police Posing as Juveniles Online to Catch Sex Offenders: Is It Working? by Kimberly Mitchell, Janis Wolak, and David Finkelhor of the University of New Hampshire’s Crimes Against Children Research Center, published in Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment in 2005, found that undercover investigations accounted for 25 percent of arrests for internet sex crimes against minors. Only 4 percent of offenders caught posing as juveniles had a prior arrest for a sexual offense against a minor, compared with 11 percent of offenders who met real victims online. Those numbers are a reason to examine predisposition closely in every sting case.

Can You Use Entrapment as a Defense to Online Solicitation in Florida?

Yes. Florida’s entrapment statute, section 777.201, applies when law enforcement induces a crime using methods that “create a substantial risk that such crime will be committed by a person other than one who is ready to commit it.” Once the defendant presents evidence of a lack of predisposition, the State must rebut it beyond a reasonable doubt. When the chat itself is undisputed, a judge can decide entrapment as a matter of law on a sworn motion to dismiss.

The Second District Court of Appeal, which hears appeals from Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties, did exactly that in DeMare v. State, 298 So. 3d 1269 (Fla. 2d DCA 2020). A detective created an 18-year-old profile named “Amber” on the dating site Meetme.com, chatted with Jason DeMare as an adult for four days, and revealed she was 14 only when plans became concrete. DeMare “immediately tried to end the relationship,” told her sex would be illegal, and was then repeatedly pressed by the detective. The court found that “his reluctance to violate the law was overcome by law enforcement inducement,” reversed his traveling conviction, and ordered him discharged.

Entrapment does not win every sting case. In State v. Panebianco, 370 So. 3d 345 (Fla. 2d DCA 2023), a Sarasota County judge dismissed solicitation and traveling charges on entrapment grounds, but the Second District reversed. The decoy there said she was 14 early and repeatedly, and Ernest Panebianco “readily engaged in sexual discussions”; his worries about police reflected “a fear of being caught rather than an unwillingness,” so predisposition was a question for a jury. The difference between the two cases is in the messages, which is why our attorneys build a timeline of who raised age, sex, and meeting first.

Can You Be Convicted of Both Solicitation and Traveling to Meet a Minor?

Usually not, when both charges rest on the same conduct. In Shelley, the Florida Supreme Court held that the Legislature did not authorize separate punishments for solicitation and traveling after solicitation, and because the elements of solicitation “are entirely subsumed” by traveling, “double jeopardy principles prohibit separate convictions based upon the same conduct.” The court approved vacating Shelley’s solicitation conviction.

In Lee v. State, 258 So. 3d 1297 (Fla. 2018), the court added that, to decide whether solicitation, unlawful use of a two-way communications device, and traveling convictions rest on the same conduct, “the reviewing court should consider only the charging document—not the entire evidentiary record.” In Dettle v. State, 395 So. 3d 1054 (Fla. 2024), the court held that Lee does not apply retroactively to cases already final in 2018, which makes raising the issue at trial and on direct appeal essential. Our attorneys read the charging information count by count for this problem.

What Other Defenses Apply to Computer Solicitation Charges?

Beyond entrapment and double jeopardy, the defense depends on what the messages show and who sent them. Our attorneys look at these issues in every case:

1. No solicitation in the words used. The State must show an attempt to seduce, solicit, lure, or entice, not just sexual talk or fantasy.
2. Belief about age. The State must prove the defendant believed he was talking with a child; an adult profile and an adult photo can undercut that belief.
3. Identity of the sender. Shared phones, shared accounts, and incomplete extractions can leave doubt about who typed the messages.
4. Missing messages. Detectives sometimes preserve screenshots instead of full exports; our forensic review looks for gaps in the conversation.
5. Objective entrapment. Police conduct so outrageous that it violates due process bars prosecution, though courts apply this narrowly.
6. Charge stacking. Separate counts for one continuous conversation, and solicitation plus traveling for the same conduct, can be challenged before trial.

For the related travel charge and vigilante cases, see our posts on what to do if you messaged a minor online, Tampa sex sting defense, and vigilante predator catchers.

What Should You Do If You Are Under Investigation for Online Solicitation?

Stop all contact, preserve your devices, and talk to a lawyer before talking to police. These steps protect the defenses described above:

1. Do not delete anything. Deleting messages or apps can look like consciousness of guilt and can destroy messages that support entrapment.
2. Do not contact the other account again. Every new message is new evidence and may be a separate count.
3. Do not consent to a phone search or interview. Politely decline and ask for a lawyer.
4. Write down the timeline of how the conversation began, which site or app was used, and what the profile said about age.
5. Call counsel immediately. Representation before charges are filed can shape how the State Attorney’s Office views the case.

Frequently Asked Questions About Solicitation of a Child Using a Computer

Is solicitation of a minor a felony if no real child was involved?

Yes, because the statute covers “a person believed by the person to be a child,” and the use of an undercover officer is not a defense by itself. The Brancato Law Firm focuses on how the detective presented the decoy’s age and who pushed the conversation toward sex.

Do I have to register as a sex offender for a computer solicitation conviction?

Yes, a conviction under section 847.0135(3) is a qualifying offense under section 943.0435. Our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm review whether any plea offer includes an amended charge that avoids registration; see our internet crimes defense page.

Can computer solicitation charges be dropped in Florida?

Yes, charges can be dismissed on a successful entrapment motion, reduced through negotiation, or dropped when the evidence does not prove solicitation. The Brancato Law Firm files sworn motions to dismiss when the chat shows a detective overcame a client’s reluctance, as happened in DeMare.

What if the profile said the person was 18?

An adult profile does not end the case if the decoy later claimed to be a minor, but it is strong evidence on belief and predisposition. Our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm build the defense around the exact point where age was introduced; our entrapment guide explains why that timing matters.

Can I be charged with traveling to meet a minor if I never got out of my car?

Yes, the traveling statute covers anyone who “travels any distance” or “attempts to do so” after a prohibited solicitation, so driving to the meeting place can be enough. The Brancato Law Firm examines whether the travel was for the purpose the statute requires and whether the solicitation count must be vacated under Shelley.

Can I be charged for each message I sent?

The statute allows each separate use of a device in which an offense is committed to be charged as a separate offense, though one conversation is usually not charged message by message. Our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm challenge counts that split one continuous conversation into multiple crimes.

For how The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. defends these cases, see our Tampa sex crimes defense practice.

Talk to a Tampa Defense Attorney About a Computer Solicitation Charge

The first decision in these cases, whether to file an entrapment motion or negotiate, depends on the full chat, so getting it reviewed early matters. Call The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., founded by Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney Rocky Brancato, at (813) 727-7159, and our attorneys will start with the complete conversation and the profile that began it. You can call us at any hour, and our office is two blocks from the courthouse. Our firm has Spanish-speaking staff, and attorney Jean-Luc Adrien speaks Spanish, Haitian Creole, and French. Read our guide for Spanish-speaking and Haitian Creole-speaking clients.

For more about our defense strategies, visit our Tampa Internet Crimes Attorney page.

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A.
620 E. Twiggs Street, Suite 205, Tampa, FL 33602
(813) 727-7159
Serving Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. is a Tampa-based criminal defense practice. We are not affiliated with any other Brancato-named law firms.

To convict someone of identity theft under Florida’s main statute, a prosecutor must prove more than that another person’s card number or Social Security number turned up in a phone or wallet. The State must prove the use, or the intended use, was willful, fraudulent, and without consent, and the heaviest penalties depend on numbers a jury has to find. I’m Rocky Brancato, founder of The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., a Tampa criminal defense firm, and former Chief Operations Officer of the Hillsborough County Public Defender’s Office, where I oversaw a staff of over 100 attorneys. Our attorneys defend identity theft, unlawful possession of personal identification information, and related fraud charges in Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties, often while the case is still an investigation.

What does the State have to prove in a Florida identity theft case?

The State must prove that you used, or possessed with intent to use, another person’s identifying information fraudulently, willfully, without authorization, and without consent. Under section 817.568(2)(a), Florida Statutes, a person commits the offense if he or she “willfully and without authorization fraudulently uses, or possesses with intent to fraudulently use, personal identification information concerning another person without first obtaining that person’s consent.”

The definition of personal identification information is broad. It means “any name or number that may be used, alone or in conjunction with any other information, to identify a specific person,” including a name, address, phone number, Social Security number, date of birth, driver license number, bank account, credit or debit card number, PIN, biometric data, and medical records. “Authorization” means “empowerment, permission, or competence to act.” Each element is a separate fight, and our Tampa white collar crime attorney team tests them one at a time.

What are the penalties for identity theft in Florida?

The degree depends on the dollar amount involved or the number of people whose information was used. Section 817.568(2) sets this ladder:

The maximums come from section 775.082, Florida Statutes. The dollar amount can be “the pecuniary benefit, the value of the services received, the payment sought to be avoided, or the amount of the injury or fraud perpetrated.” Under subsection (3), if a mandatory minimum is longer than the maximum the law otherwise allows, “the mandatory minimum sentence must be imposed.” The statute’s text has not changed since 2021. Our post on felony degrees in Florida explains how these levels interact with the sentencing scoresheet.

Do the mandatory minimums apply if I only possessed the information?

No. The 3-, 5-, and 10-year minimums in section 817.568(2)(b) and (2)(c) apply only when the person “fraudulently uses” the information. Possession with intent to use stays at subsection (2)(a), a third-degree felony with no minimum. That one word, uses, is often the most important line in the case.

When the minimum applies, the judge cannot skip it. In State v. Barnhart, 310 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020), a Leon County jury found fraud of $5,000 or more, and the trial judge held the three-year minimum “in abeyance.” The First District reversed: “As the Legislature has prescribed a three-year mandatory minimum, the trial court had no authority to do otherwise.”

The State must also charge the threshold and prove it to the jury. In Roodbergen v. State, No. 2D19-3250 (Fla. 2d DCA Nov. 5, 2021), a Manatee County case involving a victim 60 or older, the Second District held the three-year minimum applied “because the information charged and the jury, by special verdict, specifically found beyond a reasonable doubt that both of those counts involved a pecuniary benefit of $5,000 or more.” The Second District hears appeals from Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties. Our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm read the charging document and the proposed verdict form for exactly this point, because a dollar figure the jury never found cannot support a minimum.

Subsection (13) gives the prosecutor one more tool: the State may move to “reduce or suspend the sentence” of a person who provides “substantial assistance,” and the motion may be heard in camera.

Which victims make identity theft a more serious charge?

Several victim categories and methods create separate second-degree felonies or raise the degree. Section 817.568 lists them in separate subsections:

The statute states no mandatory minimum for subsections (6), (7), and (11). In Roodbergen, the Second District expressly left open whether (2)(b) and (6) “prescribe separate enhancements or separate offenses.” The Brancato Law Firm checks which subsection the State actually charged, because the wrong one changes the sentencing range.

What is unlawful possession of personal identification information?

It is a separate, lesser crime that requires no intent to defraud. Section 817.5685, Florida Statutes, makes it unlawful “to intentionally or knowingly possess, without authorization, the personal identification information of another person in any form, including, but not limited to, mail, physical documents, identification cards, or information stored in digital form.” This is often the charge when someone is found holding other people’s cards or mail.

The number of people decides the degree. Possessing the information of “four or fewer persons” is a first-degree misdemeanor. Five or more is a third-degree felony, and possession of five or more people’s information, “unless satisfactorily explained, gives rise to an inference” that it was knowing and unauthorized. The statute gives two affirmative defenses: a “reasonable belief that such possession was authorized by law or by the consent of the other person,” and information obtained from a source “open or available to the general public or from a public record.” Parents, guardians, government employees, and lawful businesses acting in the ordinary course are excluded.

Juries return this lesser charge. In King v. State, No. 4D2024-1060 (Fla. 4th DCA Oct. 29, 2025), a Broward jury convicted on the misdemeanor possession lesser, finding information of “at most, two individuals,” yet the trial court imposed 3 years in prison and 2 years of probation. The State conceded he “was adjudicated guilty and sentenced under the wrong statute,” and the Fourth District reversed for resentencing. Our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm count the victims the State can actually prove, because that count sets the ceiling.

Can the State charge one act as several counts?

Not if the counts rest on a single act. In Fravel v. State, 188 So. 3d 969 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016), the Fourth District held that “section 817.568(2)(a) is a lesser included offense, which would be subsumed by the greater offense of section 817.568(2)(b) if they were directed at a single act.” The two counts in that case survived only because the State proved “two distinct acts,” opening a Chase card and a Capital One card, and tied each count to one account.

Identity theft cases can be charged with many counts drawn from one bank statement. The Brancato Law Firm makes the State identify the specific act behind each count, and counts that duplicate one act can be challenged. Our post on how criminal charges are dropped or dismissed in Florida explains the motion practice.

What costs come with an identity theft conviction?

A plea or verdict brings a $1,001 surcharge that the judge cannot waive. Under section 817.568(12), the surcharge applies “regardless of adjudication,” so it attaches even with a withhold of adjudication. Restitution can include “attorney’s fees incurred by the victim in clearing the victim’s credit history or credit rating,” and the court may order public records corrected.

Those costs sit on top of any restitution for the money itself. Our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm look at the restitution figure as closely as the criminal charge, because the same dollar amount often drives both.

Where is an identity theft case prosecuted?

It can be prosecuted in any county where an element of the offense happened, including the county where the victim generally resides. For the consent element, section 817.568 presumes the place of consent is the county “where the victim generally resides.” A person who never set foot in Hillsborough County can be charged there if the victim lives there.

In Hillsborough County, felony charges are filed by the State Attorney’s Office for the 13th Judicial Circuit, and an arrest means a first appearance within 24 hours, usually from the Orient Road Jail. Our firm defends these cases in Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties, and our Hillsborough County criminal defense attorney page explains the local court process.

How common is identity theft in Florida?

Florida leads the country in identity theft reports per person. In 2024, Florida consumers filed 115,840 identity theft reports with the Federal Trade Commission, or 528 per 100,000 residents, ranking Florida 1st among the states, according to the FTC’s Consumer Sentinel Network Data Book 2024. Nationally, the FTC received 1,135,291 identity theft reports in 2024. These are consumer reports to the FTC, not arrests or proven crimes.

Most victims never call the police. The Bureau of Justice Statistics report Victims of Identity Theft, 2021 (released 2023) estimated that about 23.9 million people age 16 or older experienced identity theft in the prior 12 months, and only about 7% of victims reported it to police. Because so few victims report, the cases that do reach police can begin with a bank’s fraud department or a personal dispute, and our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm look closely at who reported it and why.

How do our attorneys fight an identity theft charge?

We start with consent and authorization, then make the State prove every number. Our attorneys work through six questions:

1. Was there consent or authorization? A spouse, roommate, employee, or business partner who had permission to use an account was not acting without consent, and a later falling-out does not change what was agreed at the time.
2. Who actually used the information? Shared devices, shared accounts, and shared addresses make the identity of the user a real question. Login records, IP addresses, store video, and delivery records must point to the client.
3. Was the information used or only possessed? Possession with intent is a third-degree felony with no minimum.
4. Can the State prove the amount and the victim count? The 3-, 5-, and 10-year minimums require proof of the threshold to the jury, as Roodbergen holds.
5. Do the counts duplicate one act? Under Fravel, one act cannot support stacked counts.
6. Does a section 817.5685 defense apply? A reasonable belief in consent, or information taken from a public source, is an affirmative defense to the possession charge.

Related charges often travel with identity theft, including grand theft and scheme to defraud. Our guide on how to fight a theft charge in Florida covers how value is proven in those counts.

What should you do if you are under investigation for identity theft?

Stop talking and get a lawyer involved before the State files charges. Identity theft cases are often built from bank records, subpoenas, and interviews over weeks or months, and the investigation is the best time to correct a mistaken assumption about consent or who used an account.

1. Do not explain the transactions to a detective or bank investigator. A statement about permission can be turned into an admission of use.
2. Do not contact the alleged victim. Messages about money or permission become evidence.
3. Save your own records. Texts granting permission, shared account details, and work authorizations can prove consent.
4. Ask about pre-file representation. Our firm’s pre-file advocacy puts the defense’s evidence in front of the prosecutor before the filing decision.

If an arrest has already happened, our guide on what to do after being arrested in Tampa covers the first steps.

Frequently asked questions about identity theft charges in Florida

Can identity theft charges be dropped in Florida?

Yes. Identity theft charges can be dropped or reduced when the evidence shows consent, when the State cannot prove who used the information, or when the dollar amount or victim count falls below a threshold. The Brancato Law Firm brings those records to the prosecutor early, and our post on getting charges dropped or dismissed in Florida explains the process.

Is having someone else’s credit card numbers a crime in Florida?

It can be, even without any use. Under section 817.5685, knowingly possessing another person’s card or account number without authorization is a first-degree misdemeanor for four or fewer people and a third-degree felony for five or more, and The Brancato Law Firm looks first at the statute’s defenses for consent and public sources.

Is there a mandatory minimum sentence for identity theft in Florida?

Only at the higher tiers. Fraudulent use of $5,000 or more, or of 10 or more people’s information, carries a 3-year minimum, rising to 5 and 10 years at $50,000 and $100,000 or 20 and 30 people. Our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm challenge the amount and the count, as described on our Tampa white collar crime defense page.

What if the person gave me permission to use their information?

Then it is not identity theft under section 817.568, which requires use “without first obtaining that person’s consent.” The Brancato Law Firm gathers the texts, emails, and account records that show permission, because the alleged victim’s memory of the arrangement often changes after a falling-out.

Can a parent be charged with identity theft for using a child’s information in Florida?

Yes. Under section 817.568(7), a parent, legal guardian, or person exercising custodial authority over someone under 18 or 60 or older who willfully and fraudulently uses that person’s information commits a second-degree felony. Our attorneys at The Brancato Law Firm examine whether the use was authorized for the family member’s benefit, and our Tampa white collar crime lawyer page covers related fraud charges.

What should I do if a bank or detective contacts me about identity theft?

Do not give a statement until you have spoken with a lawyer. The Brancato Law Firm provides representation before charges are filed and can respond to the investigator for you.

Call before the investigation becomes a charge

Account logs, login records, and store video are kept for limited periods, and an identity theft investigation can run for months before an arrest. The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., founded by Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney Rocky Brancato, will collect the records that show consent, test who used the information, and speak with the investigator or prosecutor before the filing decision. Call (813) 727-7159 for a free, confidential consultation; you can call us at any hour. Our firm has Spanish-speaking staff, and attorney Jean-Luc Adrien speaks Spanish, Haitian Creole, and French. Read about our Spanish and Haitian Creole criminal defense services.

For more about our defense strategies, visit our Tampa White Collar Crime Attorney page.

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A.

620 E. Twiggs Street, Suite 205, Tampa, FL 33602

(813) 727-7159

Serving Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. is a Tampa-based criminal defense practice. We are not affiliated with any other Brancato-named law firms.

I’m Rocky Brancato, founder of The Brancato Law Firm, P.A., a Tampa criminal defense firm. Our attorneys defend drug cases across Tampa Bay from the pre-file stage forward — engaging the State Attorney’s Office before charges are finalized — and the first documents we audit in every case are the lab report and the charging document, side by side. As two Florida appellate decisions this year show, when those documents don’t match, convictions come apart.

Does the State Have to Prove the Exact Drug It Charged?

Yes — and if it proves a different one, you are entitled to an acquittal, not a do-over. In Quinones Santiago v. State, No. 6D2024-1003 (Fla. 6th DCA July 24, 2026), the State charged a man with trafficking in fentanyl, identified in the charging document by fentanyl’s specific statutory listing. At trial, the State’s own evidence showed the substance in the pill bottle was actually para-fluorofentanyl — a fentanyl derivative with an extra fluorine atom, listed in a different schedule under a different statutory subsection. The State argued the difference was “a distinction without a difference.” The Sixth District disagreed: “the statutes tell a different story,” and under long-standing Florida law, where an offense can be committed in various ways, the evidence must establish it was committed in the manner charged. Because the State charged one substance and proved another, it failed to prove its case — the court reversed and remanded for a judgment of acquittal.

The court even added a pointed admonishment: problems like this “should be avoided by the State taking a moment to double-check its charging documents.” That double-check is exactly what our attorneys do from the defense side, because prosecutors filing hundreds of cases do not always match the lab chemistry to the statutory subsection — and the mismatch is a complete defense that must be raised the right way, at the right moment, to end the case rather than merely delay it.

Why Does the Exact Substance Matter So Much?

Because Florida’s drug statutes treat chemically similar substances as legally different crimes, with different schedules and different consequences. The controlled-substance schedules live in Fla. Stat. § 893.03, and the trafficking statute, Fla. Stat. § 893.135, then attaches weight thresholds and mandatory minimum sentences to specific listed substances — in the disjunctive, as alternative ways of committing the crime.

Two lessons follow. First, the chemistry is a moving target — clandestine labs constantly tweak molecules, and the Legislature responds with derivative and analog listings — so whether a specific molecule actually falls within the charged listing is a genuinely litigable question that requires reading lab data against statutory text. Second, the label on the charge controls the trial: the State cannot charge one listing and convict on another, which is why the defense audit starts with the information itself.

Can You Be Convicted Twice for the Same Drugs?

No — and in May 2026 a Florida appellate court threw out three duplicate convictions in a single case to prove it. In Medders v. State, No. 4D2025-0875 (Fla. 4th DCA May 27, 2026), the defendant was convicted of both simple possession and possession with intent to sell the same drugs, plus two identically worded trafficking counts. The Fourth District reversed the duplicates. Simple possession “is subsumed by” possession with intent — every element of the lesser crime sits inside the greater one, so under the double jeopardy test codified at Fla. Stat. § 775.021(4), only one conviction can stand. And the two trafficking counts collapsed into one for a subtler reason: the statute’s opioid-trafficking provision defines a single crime of “trafficking in illegal drugs” measured by the aggregate weight of “any” of the listed substances — so possessing two different listed opioids is one trafficking offense, not two.

Two practical notes from Medders. The double jeopardy question is answered from the charging document alone — not from what the evidence later showed — which means a sharp reading of the information can identify doomed counts before trial ever starts. And these errors are correctable even after conviction, because a true double jeopardy violation is fundamental. In a system where every added count raises the scoresheet, the plea leverage, and the sentence exposure, deleting duplicate counts is not housekeeping — it changes outcomes.

Does the “Wrong Drug” Defense Always Work?

No — and an honest read of 2026’s cases shows the line. Ten days before Quinones Santiago, the same appellate court ruled for the State in State v. Smith, No. 6D2024-0495 (Fla. 6th DCA July 10, 2026), a case about cyputylone — a designer stimulant in the “bath salts” family that is not listed anywhere in the schedules by name. The trial court had dismissed the charges for exactly that reason. The Sixth District reversed: Florida’s substituted-cathinone listing works by chemical structure, not by name, covering any compound containing the defined core structure “whether or not” further modified — language the court read as “regardless of whether.” Because cyputylone contains that core structure, it is a controlled substance even though no statute spells out its name.

Put Smith and Quinones Santiago side by side and the real rule emerges. The State gets the benefit of broad, structure-based schedule definitions — a novel molecule cannot dodge the statute with a cosmetic modification. But the State is held strictly to its own paperwork: whatever listing it charges is the listing it must prove. The defense in a designer-drug case is therefore rarely “this substance isn’t illegal” and usually “the State charged the wrong listing, proved the wrong substance, or can’t establish the chemistry beyond a reasonable doubt.” That is a technical fight, fought with chemists and statutes — which is precisely why who reads the lab file matters.

How Do Defense Lawyers Attack the Substance Element?

By treating the State’s chemistry as a claim to be tested, not a fact to be accepted. In Tampa Bay drug cases, our attorneys work through a fixed sequence: obtain the full lab file (not just the one-page report) — the instrument data, the analyst’s notes, the testing method; compare the identified molecule against the exact statutory listing charged in the information, the way Quinones Santiago requires; scrutinize chain of custody from roadside seizure through the FDLE or private lab; and where the stakes justify it, retest the substance with an independent laboratory through our forensic expert network. The same audit covers the counts themselves: possession counts that duplicate intent-to-sell counts, multiple trafficking counts built on one group of substances, and weights that only cross a mandatory-minimum threshold when separate items are improperly combined. Every one of those issues is strongest when raised early — some belong in pre-file discussions with the State Attorney’s Office, some in motions, and some (like the Quinones Santiago mismatch) at the judgment-of-acquittal stage in trial. For the trafficking-specific playbook, including mandatory minimums and threshold weights, see our guide to defending a fentanyl trafficking charge in Florida.

What Should You Do After a Drug Arrest in Tampa Bay?

Say nothing about what the substance “is” — you may know less than you think, and so may the field test. Roadside presumptive tests are notoriously unreliable, deputies routinely charge based on them, and the formal lab report often arrives after the State’s filing decision. That window between arrest and filing is where our attorneys do some of their most valuable work: putting testing problems, search issues from the traffic stop or cannabis-odor search, and charging-document defects in front of the prosecutor before the information is filed. In Hillsborough County that decision typically comes within weeks, through the State Attorney’s Office at the 13th Judicial Circuit. If you were just arrested, our step-by-step guide to what to do after being arrested in Tampa covers the first 72 hours.

For more about our defense strategies, visit our Hillsborough County criminal defense page.

For how The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. defends these cases, see our Tampa drug crimes defense practice.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens if the lab report shows a different drug than I was charged with?

That mismatch is a defense — potentially a complete one. Under Quinones Santiago v. State (Fla. 6th DCA 2026), the State must prove the substance identified in the charging document; proving a chemically and legally different substance entitles the defendant to a judgment of acquittal. Our attorneys compare the lab file to the information in every drug case for exactly this reason.

Can the State just fix the charge if it named the wrong drug?

Often it can amend before trial — which is why the timing of raising the issue is strategic, and why defense counsel may litigate it at the judgment-of-acquittal stage rather than handing the State an early warning. How and when to raise a substance mismatch is a judgment call The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. makes case by case, based on the discovery timeline and the State’s proof.

Is para-fluorofentanyl the same as fentanyl under Florida law?

No. Fentanyl is a Schedule II substance with its own statutory listing; para-fluorofentanyl is a Schedule I “fentanyl derivative” under a different subsection — chemically similar, legally distinct. As the Sixth District put it, “the statutes tell a different story,” and the difference decided Quinones Santiago.

Can I be convicted of both possession and possession with intent to sell?

Not for the same drugs. Simple possession is subsumed within possession with intent to sell, so double jeopardy — codified in Fla. Stat. § 775.021(4) — allows only one conviction, as Medders v. State (Fla. 4th DCA 2026) reaffirmed. If both convictions appear on a judgment, the duplicate can be struck, even after the fact.

Can I get two trafficking charges for two different drugs?

It depends on which listings are involved. For the opioid group in § 893.135(1)(c)1. — morphine, opium, hydromorphone and related substances — Medders holds there is one crime of “trafficking in illegal drugs” measured by aggregate weight, not a separate count per substance. Different drug families under different subsections can still be charged separately. We chart every count against the statute in trafficking cases because the count structure drives the mandatory minimums.

Do drug charges in Florida carry mandatory minimum sentences?

Trafficking charges under § 893.135 do — tied to substance and weight thresholds — which is why the exact substance and the exact weight are both worth fighting over. A successful challenge to the substance identification, the aggregation of weights, or the count structure can move a case out of mandatory-minimum territory entirely. The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. builds drug defenses around those pressure points.

Quinones Santiago and Medders are 2026’s reminders that drug cases are won on precision — the right molecule, the right statute, the right number of counts. If you or someone you love is facing a drug charge anywhere in Tampa Bay, call the attorneys of The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. — founded by Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney Rocky Brancato — at (813) 727-7159 before the State’s filing decision is made. The lab file and the charging document are already being written; someone should be auditing them for you.

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A.
620 E. Twiggs Street, Suite 205, Tampa, FL 33602
(813) 727-7159
Serving Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Pasco Counties

The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. is a Tampa-based criminal defense practice. We are not affiliated with any other Brancato-named law firms.

The jury said “not guilty.” You walked out of the Hillsborough County Courthouse relieved, thinking it was over. Then, months later, the State Attorney’s Office filed new charges based on the same facts they already lost on.

This happens more often than you might expect. However, Florida law provides a powerful shield against this prosecutorial tactic. It is called collateral estoppel defense Tampa courts recognize, and a skilled attorney can use it to protect you.

I’m Tampa Attorney Rocky Brancato. For over 25 years, I have defended clients against felony charges throughout Tampa Bay. As the former Chief Operations Officer of the Hillsborough County Public Defender’s Office, I’ve handled thousands of cases. I understand exactly how to leverage prior rulings to protect your rights. Consequently, when prosecutors try to retry settled issues, I know how to shut them down.

What Is Collateral Estoppel in Florida Criminal Cases?

Collateral estoppel, also known as “issue preclusion,” prevents prosecutors from relitigating a factual issue that a court or jury has already decided. In other words, once a fact has been determined in your favor, the State cannot reopen that same question in another case.

This principle serves two important purposes. First, it ensures fairness by protecting defendants from repetitive prosecution on identical issues. Second, it promotes judicial efficiency by preventing courts from wasting resources on questions already resolved.

For example, suppose a Tampa jury acquits you of “Aggravated Battery with a Firearm.” The prosecution cannot later charge you with “Felon in Possession of a Firearm” based on the same incident. The jury already determined you did not possess the weapon. Therefore, that finding binds the State in any related case.

Collateral Estoppel vs. Double Jeopardy

Many people confuse these two defenses. Although both protect defendants from prosecutorial overreach, they work differently.

Comparison: Collateral Estoppel vs. Double Jeopardy

How a Collateral Estoppel Defense Tampa Attorney Helps

This defense frequently plays a decisive role in felony cases involving firearms. Florida’s 10-20-Life law imposes severe mandatory minimums for crimes involving guns. As a result, prosecutors often file separate firearm-related charges stemming from a single incident.

Here is where a collateral estoppel defense Tampa strategy becomes powerful. If a jury acquits you of a firearm-related charge in one case, that finding can block prosecution in related cases.

This defense commonly applies in cases involving:

• Felon in possession of a firearm charges.
• Firearm sentence enhancements under Florida’s 10-20-Life law.
• Aggravated battery with a deadly weapon charges.
• Armed robbery and related theft offenses.

The Burden of Proof in Florida

In Florida, the defendant bears the burden of proving that collateral estoppel applies. You must present clear and convincing evidence that the issue in question was already decided in your favor. This requirement makes having an experienced collateral estoppel defense Tampa attorney essential.

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal addressed this standard in State v. Brice, 192 So. 3d 692 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016). In that case, the court emphasized a practical approach. Judges focus on substance rather than technicalities when determining whether an issue has been conclusively resolved.

To successfully assert this defense, your attorney must demonstrate:

1. The identical issue was previously litigated.
2. The issue was actually decided by the prior court or jury.
3. The determination was essential to the prior judgment.
4. The party against whom estoppel is asserted had a full opportunity to litigate the issue.

Why Special Jury Findings Matter

Collateral estoppel depends entirely on what the jury actually decided. General verdicts of “guilty” or “not guilty” sometimes leave ambiguity about which specific facts the jury determined. Consequently, special jury findings become critically important.

A special jury finding is a verdict form that asks the jury to answer specific factual questions. For example, a form might ask: “Did the defendant possess a firearm during the commission of this offense?”

If the jury answers “no,” that finding creates an unambiguous record. An experienced collateral estoppel defense Tampa attorney will request these findings on key facts whenever possible.

Florida Case Law on Collateral Estoppel

Florida appellate courts have applied this doctrine in several landmark decisions. Understanding these cases helps illustrate how this defense works in practice.

Key Precedents for Tampa Cases

The Ferguson case underscores why special jury findings matter so much. Without a clear determination from the first jury, the defense cannot apply. Therefore, your attorney must anticipate this strategy from the very beginning.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is collateral estoppel?

It prevents prosecutors from relitigating an issue that a prior jury or judge already decided in your favor. If you were acquitted on a factual question, such as firearm possession, the State cannot retry that same issue in a related case.

Who has to prove that it applies?

You do. The defendant bears the burden of proving it applies. You must show through court records and verdict forms that the issue was conclusively determined in your favor.

Can this defense get my charges dismissed?

Yes, in certain circumstances. If a prior jury determined a key factual issue in your favor, and the State’s new charges depend on that same issue, it can result in dismissal.

How is this different from double jeopardy?

Double jeopardy prevents being tried twice for the same offense. Collateral estoppel prevents relitigating specific factual issues across different charges. Both protect you, but they work in different ways.

For how this fits into the rest of a case, see our overview of how a Florida criminal case moves from investigation to appeal.

Protect Your Rights with a Tampa Defense Attorney

If you believe a prior verdict should block your current charges, you need an attorney who understands how to prove it. These cases require meticulous preparation and strategic foresight. The Brancato Law Firm, P.A. can help.

Call (813) 727-7159 Today to Discuss Your Defense Options.

Tampa Attorney Rocky Brancato has spent decades defending complex cases in Hillsborough County.

We are located at 620 E Twiggs Street, Suite 205, Tampa, FL 33602